Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 109

1.

The use of plain radiography, subtraction arthrography, nuclear arthrography, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of a loose acetabular component of a total hip prosthesis: a systematic review.

Temmerman OP, Raijmakers PG, Deville WL, Berkhof J, Hooft L, Heyligers IC.

J Arthroplasty. 2007 Sep;22(6):818-27. Epub 2007 Mar 28.

PMID:
17826271
2.

A comparison of radiographic and scintigraphic techniques to assess aseptic loosening of the acetabular component in a total hip replacement.

Temmerman OP, Raijmakers PG, David EF, Pijpers R, Molenaar MA, Hoekstra OS, Berkhof J, Manoliu RA, Teule GJ, Heyligers IC.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Nov;86-A(11):2456-63.

PMID:
15523018
3.

Accuracy of diagnostic imaging techniques in the diagnosis of aseptic loosening of the femoral component of a hip prosthesis: a meta-analysis.

Temmerman OP, Raijmakers PG, Berkhof J, Hoekstra OS, Teule GJ, Heyligers IC.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Jun;87(6):781-5. Review.

PMID:
15911658
4.

The value of contrast and subtraction arthrography in the assessment of aseptic loosening of total hip prostheses: a meta-analysis.

Temmerman OP, Heyligers IC, Teule GJ, Hoekstra OS, Raijmakers PG.

Eur J Radiol. 2005 Oct;56(1):113-9.

PMID:
15893898
5.

Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability of plain radiography, subtraction arthrography, nuclear arthrography, and bone scintigraphy in the assessment of aseptic femoral component loosening.

Temmerman OP, Raijmakers PG, Berkhof J, David EF, Pijpers R, Molenaar MA, Hoekstra OS, Teule GJ, Heyligers IC.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006 Jul;126(5):316-23. Epub 2006 Mar 18.

PMID:
16547724
6.

The diagnostic value of digital subtraction arthrography and radionuclide arthrography in revision total hip arthroplasty.

von Knoch M, Barden B, Saxler G, Löer F.

Biomed Tech (Berl). 2004 Dec;49(12):351-5.

PMID:
15655928
7.

Digital subtraction arthrography in preoperative evaluation of painful total hip arthroplasty.

Ginai AZ, van Biezen FC, Kint PA, Oei HY, Hop WC.

Skeletal Radiol. 1996 May;25(4):357-63.

PMID:
8738001
8.

The diagnostic value of digital subtraction arthrography and radionuclide bone scan in revision hip arthroplasty.

Ovesen O, Riegels-Nielsen P, Lindequist S, Jensen I, Munkner T, Torfing T, Marving J.

J Arthroplasty. 2003 Sep;18(6):735-40.

PMID:
14513446
9.

Nuclear arthrography: combined scintigraphic and radiographic procedure for diagnosis of total hip prosthesis loosening.

Oyen WJ, Lemmens JA, Claessens RA, van Horn JR, Slooff TJ, Corstens FH.

J Nucl Med. 1996 Jan;37(1):62-70.

10.

The use of subtraction arthrography in total hip arthroplasties.

Barentsz JO, Lemmens JM, Slooff TJ.

Rofo. 1986 Apr;144(4):440-6.

PMID:
3008258
11.

Arthrography of painful hips following arthroplasty: digital versus plain film subtraction.

Walker CW, FitzRandolph RL, Collins DN, Dalrymple GV.

Skeletal Radiol. 1991;20(6):403-7.

PMID:
1925670
12.

Correlation of Technetium-99m scintigraphy, progressive acetabular osteolysis and acetabular component loosening in total hip arthroplasty.

Geerdink CH, Grimm B, Rahmy AI, Vencken W, Heyligers IC, Tonino AJ.

Hip Int. 2010 Oct-Dec;20(4):460-5.

PMID:
21157750
13.

Comparison of subtraction arthrography, radionuclide arthrography and conventional plain radiography to assess loosening of total knee arthroplasty.

Marx A, Saxler G, Landgraeber S, Löer F, Holland-Letz T, von Knoch M.

Biomed Tech (Berl). 2005 May;50(5):143-7.

PMID:
15966619
14.

Radiography, radionuclide imaging, and arthrography in the evaluation of total hip and knee replacement.

Gelman MI, Coleman RE, Stevens PM, Davey BW.

Radiology. 1978 Sep;128(3):677-82.

PMID:
674636
15.

[Value of digital subtraction arthrography and radionuclide arthrography in determination of indications and planning of revision surgery in total hip replacement].

Seifert JD, Seifert J, Goymann V, Stuckmann B, Patsalis T, Müller RT.

Rofo. 2001 Mar;173(3):181-6. German.

PMID:
11293856
16.

[The methods and place of digital subtraction arthrography of the hip in detecting endoprosthesis loosening].

Fink BK, Fink U, Hansen M, Kirsch CM, Pfahler M.

Rofo. 1991 Sep;155(3):255-9. German.

PMID:
1912544
17.

Analysis of radionuclide arthrograms, radiographic arthrograms, and sequential plain radiographs in the assessment of painful hip arthroplasty.

Miniaci A, Bailey WH, Bourne RB, McLaren AC, Rorabeck CH.

J Arthroplasty. 1990 Jun;5(2):143-9.

PMID:
2358813
18.

[Value of the plain roentgen image and arthrography in diagnosis of loosening of cemented hip endoprostheses].

Greiner B, Braun M, Becker W.

Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1997 Jul-Aug;135(4):292-6. German.

PMID:
9381764
19.

[Validity of bone scintigraphy for the diagnosis of periprosthetic complications in hydroxyapatite-coated total hip arthroplasty].

Gallo J, Kamínek M, Myslivecek M, Zapletalová J, Spicka J.

Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2004;71(6):345-51. Czech.

PMID:
15686635
20.

Cemented total hip prosthesis: radiographic and scintigraphic evaluation.

Aliabadi P, Tumeh SS, Weissman BN, McNeil BJ.

Radiology. 1989 Oct;173(1):203-6.

PMID:
2675184

Supplemental Content

Support Center