Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 93

1.

Effect of slice thickness and primary 2D versus 3D virtual dissection on colorectal lesion detection at CT colonography in 452 asymptomatic adults.

Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, MacCarty RL, Mandrekar JN, Harmsen WS, Limburg PJ, Wilson LA.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Sep;189(3):672-80.

PMID:
17715116
2.
3.

Primary three-dimensional analysis with perspective-filet view versus primary two-dimensional analysis: evaluation of lesion detection by inexperienced readers at computed tomographic colonography in symptomatic patients.

Fisichella VA, Jäderling F, Horvath S, Stotzer PO, Kilander A, Hellström M.

Acta Radiol. 2009 Apr;50(3):244-55. doi: 10.1080/02841850802714797.

PMID:
19235581
4.

Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography.

Pickhardt PJ, Lee AD, Taylor AJ, Michel SJ, Winter TC, Shadid A, Meiners RJ, Chase PJ, Hinshaw JL, Williams JG, Prout TM, Husain SH, Kim DH.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Dec;189(6):1451-6.

PMID:
18029884
5.

[CT-colonography with the 16-slice CT for the diagnostic evaluation of colorectal neoplasms and inflammatory colon diseases].

Röttgen R, Schröder RJ, Lorenz M, Herbel A, Fischbach F, Herzog H, Lopez-Häninnen E, Gutberlet M, Hoffmann K, Helmig K, Felix R.

Rofo. 2003 Oct;175(10):1384-91. German.

PMID:
14556108
6.

ACRIN CT colonography trial: does reader's preference for primary two-dimensional versus primary three-dimensional interpretation affect performance?

Hara AK, Blevins M, Chen MH, Dachman AH, Kuo MD, Menias CO, Siewert B, Cheema JI, Obregon RG, Fidler JL, Zimmerman P, Horton KM, Coakley KJ, Iyer RB, Halvorsen RA Jr, Casola G, Yee J, Herman BA, Johnson CD.

Radiology. 2011 May;259(2):435-41. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11100250. Epub 2011 Mar 1.

7.

Fecal-tagging CT colonography with structure-analysis electronic cleansing for detection of colorectal flat lesions.

Xu Y, Cai W, Nappi J, Yoshida H.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Aug;81(8):1712-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.051. Epub 2011 May 19.

PMID:
21596500
8.

Noncathartic CT colonography with stool tagging: performance with and without electronic stool subtraction.

Johnson CD, Manduca A, Fletcher JG, MacCarty RL, Carston MJ, Harmsen WS, Mandrekar JN.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Feb;190(2):361-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2700.

PMID:
18212221
10.

Computer-aided detection (CAD) as a second reader using perspective filet view at CT colonography: effect on performance of inexperienced readers.

Fisichella VA, Jäderling F, Horvath S, Stotzer PO, Kilander A, Båth M, Hellström M.

Clin Radiol. 2009 Oct;64(10):972-82. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.05.012. Epub 2009 Aug 13.

PMID:
19748002
11.

Prior Image Constrained Compressed Sensing Metal Artifact Reduction (PICCS-MAR): 2D and 3D Image Quality Improvement with Hip Prostheses at CT Colonography.

Bannas P, Li Y, Motosugi U, Li K, Lubner M, Chen GH, Pickhardt PJ.

Eur Radiol. 2016 Jul;26(7):2039-46. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4044-1. Epub 2015 Oct 31.

12.

Sensitivity of CT colonography for nonpolypoid colorectal lesions interpreted by human readers and with computer-aided detection.

Park SH, Kim SY, Lee SS, Bogoni L, Kim AY, Yang SK, Myung SJ, Byeon JS, Ye BD, Ha HK.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jul;193(1):70-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2234.

PMID:
19542397
13.

Polyp measurement with CT colonography: multiple-reader, multiple-workstation comparison.

Young BM, Fletcher JG, Paulsen SR, Booya F, Johnson CD, Johnson KT, Melton Z, Rodysill D, Mandrekar J.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Jan;188(1):122-9.

PMID:
17179354
14.

Performance of a previously validated CT colonography computer-aided detection system in a new patient population.

Summers RM, Handwerker LR, Pickhardt PJ, Van Uitert RL, Deshpande KK, Yeshwant S, Yao J, Franaszek M.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Jul;191(1):168-74. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3354.

PMID:
18562741
15.

Colon dissection: a new three-dimensional reconstruction tool for computed tomography colonography.

Röttgen R, Fischbach F, Plotkin M, Herzog H, Freund T, Schröder RJ, Felix R.

Acta Radiol. 2005 May;46(3):222-6.

PMID:
15981716
16.

[CT colonography as routine method].

Böhm G, Mang T, Gschwendtner M.

Radiologe. 2012 Jun;52(6):511-8. doi: 10.1007/s00117-011-2282-z. German.

PMID:
22622413
17.

Comparison of axial, coronal, and primary 3D review in MDCT colonography for the detection of small polyps: a phantom study.

Mang T, Schaefer-Prokop C, Schima W, Maier A, Schober E, Mueller-Mang C, Weber M, Prokop M.

Eur J Radiol. 2009 Apr;70(1):86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.11.040. Epub 2008 Jan 24.

PMID:
18221849
18.

Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results.

Hoppe H, Quattropani C, Spreng A, Mattich J, Netzer P, Dinkel HP.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 May;182(5):1151-8.

PMID:
15100110
19.

Diagnostic performance of CT colonography for the detection of colorectal polyps.

Yun JY, Ro HJ, Park JB, Choi JB, Chung JE, Kim YJ, Suh WH, Lee JK.

Korean J Radiol. 2007 Nov-Dec;8(6):484-91.

20.

Assessment of two 3D MDCT colonography protocols for observation of colorectal polyps.

Yasumoto T, Murakami T, Yamamoto H, Hori M, Iannaccone R, Kim T, Abe H, Kuwabara M, Yamasaki K, Kikkawa N, Arimoto H, Passariello R, Nakamura H.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Jan;186(1):85-9.

PMID:
16357383

Supplemental Content

Support Center