Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 458

2.

Evaluation of the risk of noise-induced hearing loss among unscreened male industrial workers.

Prince MM, Gilbert SJ, Smith RJ, Stayner LT.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Feb;113(2):871-80.

PMID:
12597181
5.

A re-examination of risk estimates from the NIOSH Occupational Noise and Hearing Survey (ONHS)

Prince MM, Stayner LT, Smith RJ, Gilbert SJ.

J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Feb;101(2):950-63.

PMID:
9035391
6.

The use of the kurtosis metric in the evaluation of occupational hearing loss in workers in China: implications for hearing risk assessment.

Davis RI, Qiu W, Heyer NJ, Zhao Y, Qiuling Yang MS, Li N, Tao L, Zhu L, Zeng L, Yao D.

Noise Health. 2012 Nov-Dec;14(61):330-42. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.104903.

7.

[Risk of noise-induced hearing loss in farm tractor operators].

Solecki L.

Med Pr. 2001;52(4):265-70. Polish.

PMID:
11761672
8.

The burdens of age-related and occupational noise-induced hearing loss in the United States.

Dobie RA.

Ear Hear. 2008 Aug;29(4):565-77. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31817349ec.

PMID:
18469718
9.

Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.

Hamdan AL, Abouchacra KS, Zeki Al Hazzouri AG, Zaytoun G.

Ear Hear. 2008 Jun;29(3):360-77. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31816a0d1e.

PMID:
18382377
10.
11.

Presumed noise-induced permanent threshold shift resulting from exposure to an A-weighted Leq of 89 dB.

Berger EH, Royster LH, Thomas WG.

J Acoust Soc Am. 1978 Jul;64(1):192-7.

PMID:
711994
14.

[Findings of standard and high-frequency audiometry in workers exposed to occupational noise for long durations].

Türkkahraman S, Gök U, Karlidağ T, Keleş E, Oztürk A.

Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2003 Apr;10(4):137-42. Turkish.

PMID:
12941983
15.

Application of the kurtosis statistic to the evaluation of the risk of hearing loss in workers exposed to high-level complex noise.

Zhao YM, Qiu W, Zeng L, Chen SS, Cheng XR, Davis RI, Hamernik RP.

Ear Hear. 2010 Aug;31(4):527-32. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d94e68.

PMID:
20588120
16.

Risk factors for hearing loss at different frequencies in a population of 47,388 noise-exposed workers.

Bauer P, Körpert K, Neuberger M, Raber A, Schwetz F.

J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Dec;90(6):3086-98.

PMID:
1787247
17.

Pure-tone threshold description of an elderly French screened population.

Blanchet C, Pommie C, Mondain M, Berr C, Hillaire D, Puel JL.

Otol Neurotol. 2008 Jun;29(4):432-40. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181719746.

PMID:
18520580
18.

High-frequency (10-18 kHz) hearing thresholds: reliability, and effects of age and occupational noise exposure.

Ahmed HO, Dennis JH, Badran O, Ismail M, Ballal SG, Ashoor A, Jerwood D.

Occup Med (Lond). 2001 Jun;51(4):245-58.

PMID:
11463869
19.

Interaction of noise-induced hearing loss and presbyacusis.

Mills JH, Dubno JR, Boettcher FA.

Scand Audiol Suppl. 1998;48:117-22.

PMID:
9505304
20.

Acquisition of noise-induced hearing loss by railway workers.

Henderson D, Saunders SS.

Ear Hear. 1998 Apr;19(2):120-30.

PMID:
9562534

Supplemental Content

Support Center