Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 197

1.

Breast CT.

Glick SJ.

Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2007;9:501-26. Review.

PMID:
17506654
2.

Evaluating the impact of X-ray spectral shape on image quality in flat-panel CT breast imaging.

Glick SJ, Thacker S, Gong X, Liu B.

Med Phys. 2007 Jan;34(1):5-24.

PMID:
17278485
3.

Use of digital breast tomosynthesis with mammography for breast cancer screening or diagnosis.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association; Kaiser Foundation Health Plan; Southern California Permanente Medical Group.

Technol Eval Cent Assess Program Exec Summ. 2014 Jan;28(6):1-6. No abstract available.

PMID:
24730082
4.

Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.

Feig SA, Yaffe MJ.

Radiol Clin North Am. 1995 Nov;33(6):1205-30.

PMID:
7480666
5.

Digital mammography: an update.

Schulz-Wendtland R, Fuchsjäger M, Wacker T, Hermann KP.

Eur J Radiol. 2009 Nov;72(2):258-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.052. Epub 2009 Jul 9.

PMID:
19592186
6.

Microcalcification detection using cone-beam CT mammography with a flat-panel imager.

Gong X, Vedula AA, Glick SJ.

Phys Med Biol. 2004 Jun 7;49(11):2183-95.

PMID:
15248571
7.
8.

Dedicated breast CT: fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population.

Vedantham S, Shi L, Karellas A, O'Connell AM.

Med Phys. 2012 Dec;39(12):7317-28. doi: 10.1118/1.4765050.

9.

Advanced applications of digital mammography: tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography.

Lewin JM, Niklason L.

Semin Roentgenol. 2007 Oct;42(4):243-52. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
17919527
10.

[Clinical results of digital mammography].

Schulz-Wendtland R, Hermann KP, Bautz W.

Radiologe. 2005 Mar;45(3):255-63. Review. German.

PMID:
15744483
11.

Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study.

Chen B, Ning R.

Med Phys. 2002 May;29(5):755-70.

PMID:
12033572
12.

Fundamentals of digital mammography: physics, technology and practical considerations.

Smith A.

Radiol Manage. 2003 Sep-Oct;25(5):18-24, 26-31; quiz 32-4. No abstract available.

PMID:
14603590
13.

3D ultrasound computer tomography of the breast: a new era?

Ruiter NV, Zapf M, Hopp T, Dapp R, Kretzek E, Birk M, Kohout B, Gemmeke H.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Sep;81 Suppl 1:S133-4. doi: 10.1016/S0720-048X(12)70055-4.

PMID:
23083562
14.

Digital mammography imaging: breast tomosynthesis and advanced applications.

Helvie MA.

Radiol Clin North Am. 2010 Sep;48(5):917-29. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2010.06.009. Review.

15.

Digital mammography.

D'Orsi CJ.

Curr Womens Health Rep. 2002 Apr;2(2):124-7. Review.

PMID:
12116601
16.

A high-resolution voxel phantom of the breast for dose calculations in mammography.

Hoeschen C, Fill U, Zankl M, Panzer W, Regulla D, Döhring W.

Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;114(1-3):406-9.

PMID:
15933147
17.

Image registration for detection and quantification of change on digital tomosynthesis mammographic volumes.

Sinha SP, Narayanan R, Ma B, Roubidoux MA, Liu H, Carson PL.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Feb;192(2):384-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1388.

18.

[Phase contrast imaging of the breast. Basic principles and steps towards clinical implementation].

Grandl S, Sztrókay-Gaul A, Auweter SD, Hellerhoff K.

Radiologe. 2014 Mar;54(3):254-61. doi: 10.1007/s00117-013-2577-3. Review. German.

PMID:
24623010
19.

Digital mammography: an update.

Hailey D.

Issues Emerg Health Technol. 2006 Oct;(91):1-4.

PMID:
17073037
20.

Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts.

Del Turco MR, Mantellini P, Ciatto S, Bonardi R, Martinelli F, Lazzari B, Houssami N.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Oct;189(4):860-6.

PMID:
17885057

Supplemental Content

Support Center