Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 383

1.

Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity.

Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L.

Stat Med. 2007 Nov 10;26(25):4544-62.

PMID:
17476644
2.

Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity.

Terrin N, Schmid CH, Lau J, Olkin I.

Stat Med. 2003 Jul 15;22(13):2113-26. Erratum in: Stat Med. 2005 Mar 15;24(5):825-6.

PMID:
12820277
3.

Empirical evaluation suggests Copas selection model preferable to trim-and-fill method for selection bias in meta-analysis.

Schwarzer G, Carpenter J, Rücker G.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Mar;63(3):282-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.05.008.

PMID:
19836925
4.

Publication bias in ecology and evolution: an empirical assessment using the 'trim and fill' method.

Jennions MD, Møller AP.

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2002 May;77(2):211-22. Review.

PMID:
12056747
5.

Asymmetric funnel plots and publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy.

Song F, Khan KS, Dinnes J, Sutton AJ.

Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;31(1):88-95.

PMID:
11914301
6.

Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis.

Rücker G, Carpenter JR, Schwarzer G.

Biom J. 2011 Mar;53(2):351-68. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201000151. Epub 2011 Jan 14.

PMID:
21374698
7.

More than numbers: the power of graphs in meta-analysis.

Bax L, Ikeda N, Fukui N, Yaju Y, Tsuruta H, Moons KG.

Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Jan 15;169(2):249-55. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn340. Epub 2008 Dec 8.

PMID:
19064649
8.

Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias.

Bennett DA, Latham NK, Stretton C, Anderson CS.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Apr;57(4):349-57.

PMID:
15135835
9.

A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.

Macaskill P, Walter SD, Irwig L.

Stat Med. 2001 Feb 28;20(4):641-54.

PMID:
11223905
10.
11.

Using pseudo-data to correct for publication bias in meta-analysis.

Bowden J, Thompson JR, Burton P.

Stat Med. 2006 Nov 30;25(22):3798-813.

PMID:
16382418
12.

Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry.

Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;61(10):991-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.010. Epub 2008 Jun 6.

PMID:
18538991
13.

Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.

Formann AK.

Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 Sep;29(5):732-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.05.004. Epub 2008 May 19.

PMID:
18586577
14.

Assessing publication bias in meta-analysis.

Soeken KL, Sripusanapan A.

Nurs Res. 2003 Jan-Feb;52(1):57-60.

PMID:
12552177
15.

Assessing the sensitivity of meta-analysis to selection bias: a multiple imputation approach.

Carpenter J, Rücker G, Schwarzer G.

Biometrics. 2011 Sep;67(3):1066-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01498.x. Epub 2010 Oct 29.

PMID:
21039395
16.

Sublingual immunotherapy for allergic respiratory diseases: an evaluation of meta-analyses.

Nieto A, Mazon A, Pamies R, Bruno L, Navarro M, Montanes A.

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Jul;124(1):157-161.e1-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.04.015. Epub 2009 Jun 4.

PMID:
19500824
17.
18.

Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study.

Moreno SG, Sutton AJ, Ades AE, Stanley TD, Abrams KR, Peters JL, Cooper NJ.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Jan 12;9:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-2.

19.

Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.

Carpenter JR, Schwarzer G, Rücker G, Künstler R.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Jun;62(6):624-631.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.12.002. Epub 2009 Mar 12.

PMID:
19282148

Supplemental Content

Support Center