Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 133

1.
2.

Hospital volume, calendar age, and short term outcomes in patients undergoing repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the Ontario experience, 1988-92.

Wen SW, Simunovic M, Williams JI, Johnston KW, Naylor CD.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Apr;50(2):207-13.

3.
4.

Effect of endovascular aneurysm repair on the volume-outcome relationship in aneurysm repair.

Holt PJ, Poloniecki JD, Khalid U, Hinchliffe RJ, Loftus IM, Thompson MM.

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 Nov;2(6):624-32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.848465. Epub 2009 Sep 22.

5.

Validation of the EuroSCORE model in Australia.

Yap CH, Reid C, Yii M, Rowland MA, Mohajeri M, Skillington PD, Seevanayagam S, Smith JA.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Apr;29(4):441-6; discussion 446. Epub 2006 Feb 13.

PMID:
16473519
6.

Population-based outcomes following endovascular and open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Giles KA, Hamdan AD, Pomposelli FB, Wyers MC, Dahlberg SE, Schermerhorn ML.

J Endovasc Ther. 2009 Oct;16(5):554-64. doi: 10.1583/09-2743.1.

7.

First report on 30-day and operative mortality in risk model of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in Japan.

Motomura N, Miyata H, Tsukihara H, Okada M, Takamoto S; Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database Organization.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Dec;86(6):1866-72. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.08.001.

PMID:
19021998
8.

VBHOM, a data economic model for predicting the outcome after open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

Tang T, Walsh SR, Prytherch DR, Lees T, Varty K, Boyle JR; Audit Research Committee of the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Br J Surg. 2007 Jun;94(6):717-21.

PMID:
17514694
9.

A comparison of four severity-adjusted models to predict mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Orr RK, Maini BS, Sottile FD, Dumas EM, O'Mara P.

Arch Surg. 1995 Mar;130(3):301-6.

PMID:
7887798
10.

Risk models for mortality following elective open and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a single institution experience.

Choke E, Lee K, McCarthy M, Nasim A, Naylor AR, Bown M, Sayers R.

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012 Dec;44(6):549-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.08.011. Epub 2012 Sep 11.

11.

Thirty-day mortality statistics underestimate the risk of repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: a statewide experience.

Rigberg DA, McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Maggard MA, Agustin M, Lawrence PF, Ko CY.

J Vasc Surg. 2006 Feb;43(2):217-22; discussion 223.

12.

Endovascular repair is associated with superior clinical outcomes in patients transferred for treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Mandawat A, Mandawat A, Sosa JA, Muhs BE, Indes JE.

J Endovasc Ther. 2012 Feb;19(1):88-95. doi: 10.1583/11-3651.1.

PMID:
22313208
13.

External validity of a mortality prediction model in patients after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using multi-level methodology.

Hadjianastassiou VG, Tekkis PP, Athanasiou T, Muktadir A, Young JD, Hands LJ.

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Nov;34(5):514-21. Epub 2007 Aug 2.

14.

A comparison of the performance of a model based on administrative data and a model based on clinical data: effect of severity of illness on standardized mortality ratios of intensive care units.

Brinkman S, Abu-Hanna A, van der Veen A, de Jonge E, de Keizer NF.

Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):373-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232d7b0.

PMID:
21983367
15.

Assessment of operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery: the Cleveland Clinic Foundation colorectal cancer model.

Fazio VW, Tekkis PP, Remzi F, Lavery IC.

Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Dec;47(12):2015-24.

PMID:
15657649
16.

Comparison between an empirically derived model and the EuroSCORE system in the evaluation of hospital performance: the example of the Italian CABG Outcome Project.

D'Errigo P, Seccareccia F, Rosato S, Manno V, Badoni G, Fusco D, Perucci CA; Research Group of the Italian CABG Outcome Project.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Mar;33(3):325-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.12.001. Epub 2008 Jan 16.

PMID:
18201891
17.
18.

Multicentre study of the quality of a large administrative data set and implications for comparing death rates.

Holt PJ, Poloniecki JD, Thompson MM.

Br J Surg. 2012 Jan;99(1):58-65. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7680. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

PMID:
21994091
19.

A multi-centre additive and logistic risk model for in-hospital mortality following aortic valve replacement.

Kuduvalli M, Grayson AD, Au J, Grotte G, Bridgewater B, Fabri BM; North West Quality Improvement Programme in Cardiac Interventions.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Apr;31(4):607-13. Epub 2007 Feb 6.

PMID:
17287128
20.

Age stratified, perioperative, and one-year mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a statewide experience.

Rigberg DA, Zingmond DS, McGory ML, Maggard MA, Agustin M, Lawrence PF, Ko CY.

J Vasc Surg. 2006 Feb;43(2):224-9.

Supplemental Content

Support Center