Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 185

1.

Inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates causing bacteremia at a university hospital in southern Taiwan.

Janapatla RP, Yan JJ, Huang AH, Chen HM, Wu HM, Wu JJ.

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Jun;58(2):203-9.

PMID:
17300897
2.

Testing for induction of clindamycin resistance in erythromycin-resistant isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.

Steward CD, Raney PM, Morrell AK, Williams PP, McDougal LK, Jevitt L, McGowan JE Jr, Tenover FC.

J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Apr;43(4):1716-21.

3.
4.
5.

Prevalence of macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin resistance among staphylococci in a tertiary care hospital in Athens, Greece.

Vallianou N, Evangelopoulos A, Hadjisoteriou M, Avlami A, Petrikkos G.

J Chemother. 2015;27(6):319-23. doi: 10.1179/1973947814Y.0000000205.

PMID:
25112954
6.

Distribution of genes encoding resistance to macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramins among clinical staphylococcal isolates in a Turkish university hospital.

Cetin ES, Gunes H, Kaya S, Aridogan BC, Demirci M.

J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2010 Dec;43(6):524-9. doi: 10.1016/S1684-1182(10)60081-3.

7.

Differences in potential for selection of clindamycin-resistant mutants between inducible erm(A) and erm(C) Staphylococcus aureus genes.

Daurel C, Huet C, Dhalluin A, Bes M, Etienne J, Leclercq R.

J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Feb;46(2):546-50.

8.

Detection and prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance in staphylococci.

Yilmaz G, Aydin K, Iskender S, Caylan R, Koksal I.

J Med Microbiol. 2007 Mar;56(Pt 3):342-5.

PMID:
17314364
9.

[Detection of inducible resistance to clindamycin in cutaneous isolates of Staphylococcus spp. by phenotypic and genotypic methods].

Merino-Díaz L, Cantos de la Casa A, Torres-Sánchez MJ, Aznar-Martín J.

Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2007 Feb;25(2):77-81. Spanish.

PMID:
17288904
10.
11.

Macrolide resistance genotypes and phenotypes among erythromycin-resistant clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci, Italy.

Gherardi G, De Florio L, Lorino G, Fico L, Dicuonzo G.

FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2009 Jan;55(1):62-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2008.00499.x.

12.

Phenotypic detection of inducible clindamycin resistance among Staphylococcus aureus isolates by using the lower limit of recommended inter-disk distance.

Ajantha GS, Kulkarni RD, Shetty J, Shubhada C, Jain P.

Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2008 Jul-Sep;51(3):376-8.

13.

[Macrolide resistance phenotypes and genotypes in group G streptococci].

Açikgöz ZC, Göçer S, Almayanlar E.

Mikrobiyol Bul. 2003 Apr-Jun;37(2-3):117-24. Turkish.

PMID:
14593892
15.

[Prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from clinical samples].

Colakoğlu S, Alişkan H, Turunç T, Demiroğlu YZ, Arslan H.

Mikrobiyol Bul. 2008 Jul;42(3):407-12. Turkish.

PMID:
18822883
16.
17.

Prevalence of polyclonal mefA-containing isolates among erythromycin-resistant group A streptococci in Southern Taiwan.

Yan JJ, Wu HM, Huang AH, Fu HM, Lee CT, Wu JJ.

J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Jul;38(7):2475-9.

18.

Inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: a study from North India.

Gupta V, Datta P, Rani H, Chander J.

J Postgrad Med. 2009 Jul-Sep;55(3):176-9. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.57393.

20.
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center