Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 169

1.

Evaluating the impact of X-ray spectral shape on image quality in flat-panel CT breast imaging.

Glick SJ, Thacker S, Gong X, Liu B.

Med Phys. 2007 Jan;34(1):5-24.

PMID:
17278485
2.
3.

Microcalcification detection using cone-beam CT mammography with a flat-panel imager.

Gong X, Vedula AA, Glick SJ.

Phys Med Biol. 2004 Jun 7;49(11):2183-95.

PMID:
15248571
4.

Simulation study of a quasi-monochromatic beam for x-ray computed mammotomography.

McKinley RL, Tornai MP, Samei E, Bradshaw ML.

Med Phys. 2004 Apr;31(4):800-13. Erratum in: Med Phys. 2004 Nov;31(11):3163.

PMID:
15124997
5.

High resolution dual detector volume-of-interest cone beam breast CT--Demonstration with a bench top system.

Shen Y, Yi Y, Zhong Y, Lai CJ, Liu X, You Z, Ge S, Wang T, Shaw CC.

Med Phys. 2011 Dec;38(12):6429-42. doi: 10.1118/1.3656040.

6.

The quantitative potential for breast tomosynthesis imaging.

Shafer CM, Samei E, Lo JY.

Med Phys. 2010 Mar;37(3):1004-16.

7.
8.

Dedicated breast CT: fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population.

Vedantham S, Shi L, Karellas A, O'Connell AM.

Med Phys. 2012 Dec;39(12):7317-28. doi: 10.1118/1.4765050.

9.

A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.

Samei E, Dobbins JT 3rd, Lo JY, Tornai MP.

Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;114(1-3):220-9.

PMID:
15933112
10.

Effect of slice thickness on detectability in breast CT using a prewhitened matched filter and simulated mass lesions.

Packard NJ, Abbey CK, Yang K, Boone JM.

Med Phys. 2012 Apr;39(4):1818-30. doi: 10.1118/1.3692176.

11.

Breast CT.

Glick SJ.

Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2007;9:501-26. Review.

PMID:
17506654
12.

A mathematical model platform for optimizing a multiprojection breast imaging system.

Chawla AS, Samei E, Saunders RS, Lo JY, Baker JA.

Med Phys. 2008 Apr;35(4):1337-45.

13.

Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.

Boyce SJ, Samei E.

Med Phys. 2006 Apr;33(4):984-96.

PMID:
16696475
14.

A minimum spanning forest based classification method for dedicated breast CT images.

Pike R, Sechopoulos I, Fei B.

Med Phys. 2015 Nov;42(11):6190-202. doi: 10.1118/1.4931958.

15.

Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study.

Chen B, Ning R.

Med Phys. 2002 May;29(5):755-70.

PMID:
12033572
16.

Low dose high energy x-ray in-line phase sensitive imaging prototype: Investigation of optimal geometric conditions and design parameters.

Ghani MU, Yan A, Wong MD, Li Y, Ren L, Wu X, Liu H.

J Xray Sci Technol. 2015;23(6):667-82. doi: 10.3233/XST-150519.

17.

Optimal multidetector row CT parameters for evaluations of the breast: a phantom and specimen study.

Yi A, Seo BK, Cho PK, Pisano ED, Lee KY, Je BK, Kim HY, Min BW, Son GS.

Acad Radiol. 2010 Jun;17(6):744-51. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.02.008.

PMID:
20457417
18.

Why should breast tumour detection go three dimensional?

Chen Z, Ning R.

Phys Med Biol. 2003 Jul 21;48(14):2217-28.

PMID:
12894980
19.

A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.

Wu T, Moore RH, Rafferty EA, Kopans DB.

Med Phys. 2004 Sep;31(9):2636-47.

PMID:
15487747
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center