Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 443

1.

A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis.

Zhang Y, Chan HP, Sahiner B, Wei J, Goodsitt MM, Hadjiiski LM, Ge J, Zhou C.

Med Phys. 2006 Oct;33(10):3781-95.

2.

Image quality of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of projection-view distributions.

Lu Y, Chan HP, Wei J, Goodsitt M, Carson PL, Hadjiiski L, Schmitz A, Eberhard JW, Claus BE.

Med Phys. 2011 Oct;38(10):5703-12. doi: 10.1118/1.3637492.

3.
4.

Evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction algorithms using synchrotron radiation in standard geometry.

Bliznakova K, Kolitsi Z, Speller RD, Horrocks JA, Tromba G, Pallikarakis N.

Med Phys. 2010 Apr;37(4):1893-903.

PMID:
20443511
5.

A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis.

Rakowski JT, Dennis MJ.

Med Phys. 2006 Aug;33(8):3018-32.

PMID:
16964880
6.

Comparison study of reconstruction algorithms for prototype digital breast tomosynthesis using various breast phantoms.

Kim YS, Park HS, Lee HH, Choi YW, Choi JG, Kim HH, Kim HJ.

Radiol Med. 2016 Feb;121(2):81-92. doi: 10.1007/s11547-015-0583-4. Epub 2015 Sep 18.

PMID:
26383027
7.

Application of boundary detection information in breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.

Zhang Y, Chan HP, Sahiner B, Wu YT, Zhou C, Ge J, Wei J, Hadjiiski LM.

Med Phys. 2007 Sep;34(9):3603-13.

9.

Artifact reduction methods for truncated projections in iterative breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.

Zhang Y, Chan HP, Sahiner B, Wei J, Zhou C, Hadjiiski LM.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009 May-Jun;33(3):426-35. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181838000.

10.

Characterization of a constrained paired-view technique in iterative reconstruction for breast tomosynthesis.

Wu G, Mainprize JG, Yaffe MJ.

Med Phys. 2013 Oct;40(10):101901. doi: 10.1118/1.4819943.

PMID:
24089903
11.

Segmented separable footprint projector for digital breast tomosynthesis and its application for subpixel reconstruction.

Zheng J, Fessler JA, Chan HP.

Med Phys. 2017 Mar;44(3):986-1001. doi: 10.1002/mp.12092.

PMID:
28058719
12.

Task-based performance analysis of FBP, SART and ML for digital breast tomosynthesis using signal CNR and Channelised Hotelling Observers.

Van de Sompel D, Brady SM, Boone J.

Med Image Anal. 2011 Feb;15(1):53-70. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2010.07.004. Epub 2010 Jul 27.

PMID:
20713313
13.

Implementation and evaluation of an expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm for gamma emission breast tomosynthesis.

Gong Z, Klanian K, Patel T, Sullivan O, Williams MB.

Med Phys. 2012 Dec;39(12):7580-92. doi: 10.1118/1.4764480.

14.

An object-oriented simulator for 3D digital breast tomosynthesis imaging system.

Seyyedi S, Cengiz K, Kamasak M, Yildirim I.

Comput Math Methods Med. 2013;2013:250689. doi: 10.1155/2013/250689. Epub 2013 Nov 25.

15.

A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.

Wu T, Moore RH, Rafferty EA, Kopans DB.

Med Phys. 2004 Sep;31(9):2636-47.

PMID:
15487747
16.

Multiscale bilateral filtering for improving image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Lu Y, Chan HP, Wei J, Hadjiiski LM, Samala RK.

Med Phys. 2015 Jan;42(1):182-95. doi: 10.1118/1.4903283.

18.

A diffusion-based truncated projection artifact reduction method for iterative digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.

Lu Y, Chan HP, Wei J, Hadjiiski LM.

Phys Med Biol. 2013 Feb 7;58(3):569-87. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/3/569. Epub 2013 Jan 14.

19.

Improved digital breast tomosynthesis images using automated ultrasound.

Zhang X, Yuan J, Du S, Kripfgans OD, Wang X, Carson PL, Liu X.

Med Phys. 2014 Jun;41(6):061911. doi: 10.1118/1.4875980.

20.

Optimization of the acquisition geometry in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.

Sechopoulos I, Ghetti C.

Med Phys. 2009 Apr;36(4):1199-207.

PMID:
19472626

Supplemental Content

Support Center