Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 266

1.

Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients.

Lauridsen HH, Hartvigsen J, Manniche C, Korsholm L, Grunnet-Nilsson N.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 Oct 25;7:82.

2.

Danish version of the Oswestry disability index for patients with low back pain. Part 2: Sensitivity, specificity and clinically significant improvement in two low back pain populations.

Lauridsen HH, Hartvigsen J, Manniche C, Korsholm L, Grunnet-Nilsson N.

Eur Spine J. 2006 Nov;15(11):1717-28. Epub 2006 May 31. Erratum in: Eur Spine J. 2007 Jan;16(1):135-6.

PMID:
16736202
3.

Outcome measures in chronic low back pain.

Maughan EF, Lewis JS.

Eur Spine J. 2010 Sep;19(9):1484-94. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1353-6. Epub 2010 Apr 17.

4.

Concurrent comparison of responsiveness in pain and functional status measurements used for patients with low back pain.

Grotle M, Brox JI, Vøllestad NK.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Nov 1;29(21):E492-501.

PMID:
15507789
5.

Danish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Part 1: Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity in two different populations.

Lauridsen HH, Hartvigsen J, Manniche C, Korsholm L, Grunnet-Nilsson N.

Eur Spine J. 2006 Nov;15(11):1705-16. Epub 2006 May 31.

PMID:
16736204
6.

Responsiveness of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index in subjects with low back pain.

Coelho RA, Siqueira FB, Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML.

Eur Spine J. 2008 Aug;17(8):1101-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0690-1. Epub 2008 May 30.

7.

Responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire in Italian subjects with sub-acute and chronic low back pain.

Monticone M, Baiardi P, Vanti C, Ferrari S, Pillastrini P, Mugnai R, Foti C.

Eur Spine J. 2012 Jan;21(1):122-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1959-3. Epub 2011 Aug 8.

8.

Responsiveness of a patient specific outcome measure compared with the Oswestry Disability Index v2.1 and Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire for patients with subacute and chronic low back pain.

Frost H, Lamb SE, Stewart-Brown S.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Oct 15;33(22):2450-7; discussion 2458. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818916fd.

PMID:
18824951
9.
10.

Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Parker SL, Adogwa O, Paul AR, Anderson WN, Aaronson O, Cheng JS, McGirt MJ.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 May;14(5):598-604. doi: 10.3171/2010.12.SPINE10472. Epub 2011 Feb 18.

PMID:
21332281
11.

Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity and disability in patients with nonspecific low back pain.

Kovacs FM, Abraira V, Royuela A, Corcoll J, Alegre L, Cano A, Muriel A, Zamora J, del Real MT, Gestoso M, Mufraggi N.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Dec 1;32(25):2915-20. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815b75ae.

PMID:
18246018
12.

Responsiveness of the Chinese version of the Oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain.

Ma C, Wu S, Xiao L, Xue Y.

Eur Spine J. 2011 Mar;20(3):475-81. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1624-2. Epub 2010 Nov 26.

13.

Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 2: sensitivity to change after spinal surgery.

Mannion AF, Junge A, Grob D, Dvorak J, Fairbank JC.

Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15(1):66-73. Epub 2005 Apr 26.

14.

Short-term effectiveness of spinal manipulative therapy versus functional technique in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Castro-Sánchez AM, Lara-Palomo IC, Matarán-Peñarrocha GA, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Saavedra-Hernández M, Cleland J, Aguilar-Ferrándiz ME.

Spine J. 2016 Mar;16(3):302-12. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.08.057. Epub 2015 Sep 8.

PMID:
26362233
15.

Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.

Parker SL, Mendenhall SK, Shau D, Adogwa O, Cheng JS, Anderson WN, Devin CJ, McGirt MJ.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Jan;16(1):61-7. doi: 10.3171/2011.8.SPINE1194. Epub 2011 Sep 30.

PMID:
21962034
16.

Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.

Copay AG, Glassman SD, Subach BR, Berven S, Schuler TC, Carreon LY.

Spine J. 2008 Nov-Dec;8(6):968-74. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.11.006. Epub 2008 Jan 16.

PMID:
18201937
17.

What is an acceptable outcome of treatment before it begins? Methodological considerations and implications for patients with chronic low back pain.

Lauridsen HH, Manniche C, Korsholm L, Grunnet-Nilsson N, Hartvigsen J.

Eur Spine J. 2009 Dec;18(12):1858-66. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1070-1. Epub 2009 Jun 23.

18.

Validation of the Hungarian version of the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire.

Valasek T, Varga PP, Szövérfi Z, Bozsodi A, Klemencsics I, Fekete L, Lazary A.

Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(1):86-90. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.909536. Epub 2014 Apr 21.

PMID:
24749486
19.

Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: part 2.

Riddle DL, Stratford PW, Binkley JM.

Phys Ther. 1998 Nov;78(11):1197-207.

PMID:
9806624
20.

Is the Oswestry Disability Index a valid measure of response to sacroiliac joint treatment?

Copay AG, Cher DJ.

Qual Life Res. 2016 Feb;25(2):283-92. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1095-3. Epub 2015 Aug 6.

Supplemental Content

Support Center