Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 76

1.

Using instant messaging for Internet-based interviews.

Stieger S, Göritz AS.

Cyberpsychol Behav. 2006 Oct;9(5):552-9.

PMID:
17034322
2.

Dynamic Interviewing Program (DIP): automatic online interviews via the instant messenger ICQ.

Stieger S, Reips UD.

Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008 Apr;11(2):201-7. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0030.

PMID:
18422414
3.

Analysis and lessons learned instituting an instant messaging reference service at an academic health sciences library: the first year.

Kipnis DG, Kaplan GE.

Med Ref Serv Q. 2008 Spring;27(1):33-51. doi: 10.1300/J115v27n01_03.

PMID:
18689202
4.

Learning the determinants of satisfaction and usage intention of instant messaging.

Lin CP, Huang HN, Joe SW, Ma HC.

Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008 Jun;11(3):262-7. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0062.

PMID:
18537494
5.

The efficacy of interviewing young drug users through online chat.

Barratt MJ.

Drug Alcohol Rev. 2012 Jun;31(4):566-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00399.x. Epub 2011 Dec 14.

PMID:
22168668
6.

Older adults living through and with their computers.

Clark DJ.

Comput Inform Nurs. 2002 May-Jun;20(3):117-24.

PMID:
12021610
7.

Dissemination of psychoactive substance information by innovative drug users.

Boyer EW, Lapen PT, Macalino G, Hibberd PL.

Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007 Feb;10(1):1-6.

PMID:
17305442
8.
9.

Learning online social support: an investigation of network information technology based on UTAUT.

Lin CP, Anol B.

Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008 Jun;11(3):268-72. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0057.

PMID:
18537495
10.

Characteristics and motives of adolescents talking with strangers on the internet.

Peter J, Valkenburg PM, Schouten AP.

Cyberpsychol Behav. 2006 Oct;9(5):526-30.

PMID:
17034318
11.
12.

A "second look" at interviews with adolescents.

Baker CD.

J Youth Adolesc. 1983 Dec;12(6):501-19.

PMID:
12339719
13.

Evaluate the Usability of the Mobile Instant Messaging Software in the Elderly.

Wen TN, Cheng PL, Chang PL.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:818-822.

PMID:
29295212
15.

Adapting qualitative research strategies to technology savvy adolescents.

Mason DM, Ide B.

Nurse Res. 2014 May;21(5):40-5. doi: 10.7748/nr.21.5.40.e1241.

PMID:
24877910
16.

Using chat and text technologies to answer sexual and reproductive health questions: Planned Parenthood pilot study.

Giorgio MM, Kantor LM, Levine DS, Arons W.

J Med Internet Res. 2013 Sep 20;15(9):e203. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2619.

17.

Distractions, distractions: does instant messaging affect college students' performance on a concurrent reading comprehension task?

Fox AB, Rosen J, Crawford M.

Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009 Feb;12(1):51-3. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0107.

PMID:
19006461
18.

Sources of traffic and visitors' preferences regarding online public reports of quality: web analytics and online survey results.

Bardach NS, Hibbard JH, Greaves F, Dudley RA.

J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 1;17(5):e102. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3637.

19.

Online health communication about human genetics: perceptions and preferences of internet users.

Bernhardt JM, McClain J, Parrott RL.

Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004 Dec;7(6):728-33.

PMID:
15687808
20.

Predictors of problematic Internet use on Turkish university students.

Ceyhan AA.

Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008 Jun;11(3):363-6. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0112.

PMID:
18537510

Supplemental Content

Support Center