Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 394

1.

Impact of providing audiotapes of primary treatment consultations to men with prostate cancer: a multi-site, randomized, controlled trial.

Hack TF, Pickles T, Bultz BD, Ruether JD, Degner LF.

Psychooncology. 2007 Jun;16(6):543-52.

PMID:
16991107
2.

Impact of providing audiotapes of primary adjuvant treatment consultations to women with breast cancer: a multisite, randomized, controlled trial.

Hack TF, Pickles T, Bultz BD, Ruether JD, Weir LM, Degner LF, Mackey JR.

J Clin Oncol. 2003 Nov 15;21(22):4138-44.

PMID:
14615442
3.

Standardized audiotape versus recorded consultation to enhance informed consent to a clinical trial in breast oncology.

Hack TF, Whelan T, Olivotto IA, Weir L, Bultz BD, Magwood B, Ashbury F, Brady J.

Psychooncology. 2007 Apr;16(4):371-6.

PMID:
16906625
4.

Audio-taping the oncology treatment consultation: a literature review.

McClement SE, Hack TF.

Patient Educ Couns. 1999 Mar;36(3):229-38. Review.

PMID:
14528558
5.

Predictors of distress and quality of life in patients undergoing cancer therapy: impact of treatment type and decisional role.

Hack TF, Pickles T, Ruether JD, Weir L, Bultz BD, Mackey J, Degner LF.

Psychooncology. 2010 Jun;19(6):606-16. doi: 10.1002/pon.1590.

PMID:
19557823
6.

Consultation audio-tapes: an information aid, and a quality assurance and research tool.

Tattersall MH.

Support Care Cancer. 2002 Apr;10(3):217-21. Epub 2001 Aug 11. Review.

PMID:
11904786
7.

Prospective randomised clinical trial of providing patients with audiotape recordings of their oesophagogastric cancer consultations.

Stephens MR, Gaskell AL, Gent C, Pellard S, Day-Thompson R, Blackshaw GR, Lewis WG.

Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Aug;72(2):218-22. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.04.004. Epub 2008 May 29.

PMID:
18513915
8.

Behind closed doors II: systematic analysis of prostate cancer patients' primary treatment consultations with radiation oncologists and predictors of satisfaction with communication.

Hack TF, Ruether JD, Pickles T, Bultz BD, Chateau D, Degner LF.

Psychooncology. 2012 Aug;21(8):809-17. doi: 10.1002/pon.1984. Epub 2011 May 6.

PMID:
21557385
9.

[Providing patients with an audio recording of the outpatient oncological consultation; experiences of patients and physicians].

Ong LM, de Haes JC, Kruyver IP, de Reijke TM, Lammes FB.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1995 Jan 14;139(2):77-80. Dutch.

PMID:
7838223
10.

Randomized controlled trial of a prompt list to help advanced cancer patients and their caregivers to ask questions about prognosis and end-of-life care.

Clayton JM, Butow PN, Tattersall MH, Devine RJ, Simpson JM, Aggarwal G, Clark KJ, Currow DC, Elliott LM, Lacey J, Lee PG, Noel MA.

J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 20;25(6):715-23.

PMID:
17308275
11.

Providing letters and audiotapes to supplement a prenatal diagnostic consultation: effects on later distress and recall.

Cope CD, Lyons AC, Donovan V, Rylance M, Kilby MD.

Prenat Diagn. 2003 Dec 30;23(13):1060-7.

PMID:
14691993
12.

Promoting patient participation and shortening cancer consultations: a randomised trial.

Brown RF, Butow PN, Dunn SM, Tattersall MH.

Br J Cancer. 2001 Nov 2;85(9):1273-9.

13.

Behind closed doors: systematic analysis of breast cancer consultation communication and predictors of satisfaction with communication.

Hack TF, Pickles T, Ruether JD, Weir L, Bultz BD, Degner LF.

Psychooncology. 2010 Jun;19(6):626-36. doi: 10.1002/pon.1592.

PMID:
19514095
14.
15.

Family history of breast cancer: what do women understand and recall about their genetic risk?

Watson M, Duvivier V, Wade Walsh M, Ashley S, Davidson J, Papaikonomou M, Murday V, Sacks N, Eeles R.

J Med Genet. 1998 Sep;35(9):731-8.

16.

Comparison of perspectives on prostate cancer: analyses of survey data.

Crawford ED, Bennett CL, Stone NN, Knight SJ, DeAntoni E, Sharp L, Garnick MB, Porterfield HA.

Urology. 1997 Sep;50(3):366-72.

PMID:
9301699
17.

Promoting consultation recording practice in oncology: identification of critical implementation factors and determination of patient benefit.

Hack TF, Ruether JD, Weir LM, Grenier D, Degner LF.

Psychooncology. 2013 Jun;22(6):1273-82. doi: 10.1002/pon.3135. Epub 2012 Jul 23.

PMID:
22821445
18.

Men's perspectives on the impact of prostate cancer: implications for oncology nurses.

Fitch MI, Gray R, Franssen E, Johnson B.

Oncol Nurs Forum. 2000 Sep;27(8):1255-63.

PMID:
11013906
19.

Improving the quality of life of patients with prostate carcinoma: a randomized trial testing the efficacy of a nurse-driven intervention.

Giesler RB, Given B, Given CW, Rawl S, Monahan P, Burns D, Azzouz F, Reuille KM, Weinrich S, Koch M, Champion V.

Cancer. 2005 Aug 15;104(4):752-62.

20.

Computer-based interaction analysis of the cancer consultation.

Butow PN, Dunn SM, Tattersall MH, Jones QJ.

Br J Cancer. 1995 May;71(5):1115-21.

Supplemental Content

Support Center