Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 121

1.

Marker-assisted selection based on a multi-trait economic index in chicken: Experimental results and simulation.

Lahav T, Atzmon G, Blum S, Ben-Ari G, Weigend S, Cahaner A, Lavi U, Hillel J.

Anim Genet. 2006 Oct;37(5):482-8.

PMID:
16978178
2.

Theoretical efficiency of multiple-trait quantitative trait loci-assisted selection.

Togashi K, Lin CY.

J Anim Breed Genet. 2010 Feb;127(1):53-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2009.00817.x.

PMID:
20074187
3.

Benefits from marker-assisted selection under an additive polygenic genetic model.

Villanueva B, Pong-Wong R, Fernández J, Toro MA.

J Anim Sci. 2005 Aug;83(8):1747-52.

4.

Primary factors affecting the evaluation accuracy of animal model MBLUP.

Lu SX, Wu CX, Lian LS.

Yi Chuan Xue Bao. 2003 Jan;30(1):35-9.

PMID:
12812074
5.
6.

Within-family marker-assisted selection for aquaculture species.

Sonesson AK.

Genet Sel Evol. 2007 May-Jun;39(3):301-17. Epub 2007 Apr 14.

7.

DNA microsatellites linked to quantitative trait loci affecting antibody response and survival rate in meat-type chickens.

Yonash N, Cheng HH, Hillel J, Heller DE, Cahaner A.

Poult Sci. 2001 Jan;80(1):22-8.

PMID:
11214332
8.
9.

Impacts of QTL x environment interactions on genetic response to marker-assisted selection.

Liu PY, Zhu J, Yan L.

Yi Chuan Xue Bao. 2006 Jan;33(1):63-71.

PMID:
16450589
10.

Strategies to utilize marker-quantitative trait loci associations.

Haley CS, Visscher PM.

J Dairy Sci. 1998 Sep;81 Suppl 2:85-97. Review.

PMID:
9777515
11.

Simultaneous selection of major and minor genes: use of QTL to increase selection efficiency of coleoptile length of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Wang J, Chapman SC, Bonnett DG, Rebetzke GJ.

Theor Appl Genet. 2009 Jun;119(1):65-74. doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-1017-2. Epub 2009 Apr 10.

PMID:
19360392
13.

The impact of genetic markers on selection.

Davis GP, DeNise SK.

J Anim Sci. 1998 Sep;76(9):2331-9. Review.

14.

QTL detection with bidirectional and unidirectional selective genotyping: marker-based and trait-based analyses.

Navabi A, Mather DE, Bernier J, Spaner DM, Atlin GN.

Theor Appl Genet. 2009 Jan;118(2):347-58. doi: 10.1007/s00122-008-0904-2. Epub 2008 Oct 15.

PMID:
18854970
15.

Selection strategies for body weight and reduced ascites susceptibility in broilers.

Pakdel A, Bijma P, Ducro BJ, Bovenhuis H.

Poult Sci. 2005 Apr;84(4):528-35.

PMID:
15844807
16.

Estimation by simulation of the efficiency of the French marker-assisted selection program in dairy cattle.

Guillaume F, Fritz S, Boichard D, Druet T.

Genet Sel Evol. 2008 Jan-Feb;40(1):91-102. Epub 2007 Dec 21.

17.
18.

Genetic analysis of an F(2) intercross between two chicken lines divergently selected for body-weight.

Wahlberg P, Carlborg O, Foglio M, Tordoir X, Syvänen AC, Lathrop M, Gut IG, Siegel PB, Andersson L.

BMC Genomics. 2009 May 27;10:248. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-248.

19.

The selection index--then, now, and for the future.

Hazel LN, Dickerson GE, Freeman AE.

J Dairy Sci. 1994 Oct;77(10):3236-51. Review.

PMID:
7836610
20.

Comparative analysis of marker-assisted and phenotypic selection for yield components in cucumber.

Robbins MD, Staub JE.

Theor Appl Genet. 2009 Aug;119(4):621-34. doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-1072-8. Epub 2009 May 31.

PMID:
19484431

Supplemental Content

Support Center