Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 506

1.

A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome.

Broekmans FJ, Kwee J, Hendriks DJ, Mol BW, Lambalk CB.

Hum Reprod Update. 2006 Nov-Dec;12(6):685-718. Review.

2.

Repeated clomiphene citrate challenge testing in the prediction of outcome in IVF: a comparison with basal markers for ovarian reserve.

Hendriks DJ, Broekmans FJ, Bancsi LF, de Jong FH, Looman CW, Te Velde ER.

Hum Reprod. 2005 Jan;20(1):163-9.

3.

Circulating basal anti-Müllerian hormone levels as predictor of ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization.

Nardo LG, Gelbaya TA, Wilkinson H, Roberts SA, Yates A, Pemberton P, Laing I.

Fertil Steril. 2009 Nov;92(5):1586-93. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.127.

PMID:
18930213
6.
7.

Evaluation of anti-Müllerian hormone as a test for the prediction of ovarian reserve.

Kwee J, Schats R, McDonnell J, Themmen A, de Jong F, Lambalk C.

Fertil Steril. 2008 Sep;90(3):737-43.

PMID:
17923131
8.

Dynamic tests of ovarian reserve: a systematic review of diagnostic accuracy.

Maheshwari A, Gibreel A, Bhattacharya S, Johnson NP.

Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 May;18(5):717-34. Review.

PMID:
19549453
9.

Antral follicle count, anti-mullerian hormone and inhibin B: predictors of ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology?

Muttukrishna S, McGarrigle H, Wakim R, Khadum I, Ranieri DM, Serhal P.

BJOG. 2005 Oct;112(10):1384-90.

12.

[Value of serum inhibin B measurement in predicting ovarian response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization cycle].

Chen Y, Yu Q, Zhang YW, He FF, Sun ZY.

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Jun;41(6):368-71. Chinese.

PMID:
16831355
13.
14.

Relevance of anti-Mullerian hormone measurement in a routine IVF program.

Gnoth C, Schuring AN, Friol K, Tigges J, Mallmann P, Godehardt E.

Hum Reprod. 2008 Jun;23(6):1359-65. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den108.

15.

The role of antimullerian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count.

Broer SL, Mol BW, Hendriks D, Broekmans FJ.

Fertil Steril. 2009 Mar;91(3):705-14. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.013. Review.

PMID:
18321493
16.

The predictive value of ovarian reserve tests for spontaneous pregnancy in subfertile ovulatory women.

Haadsma ML, Groen H, Fidler V, Bukman A, Roeloffzen EM, Groenewoud ER, Broekmans FJ, Heineman MJ, Hoek A.

Hum Reprod. 2008 Aug;23(8):1800-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den234.

17.

Single and repeated GnRH agonist stimulation tests compared with basal markers of ovarian reserve in the prediction of outcome in IVF.

Hendriks DJ, Broekmans FJ, Bancsi LF, Looman CW, de Jong FH, te Velde ER.

J Assist Reprod Genet. 2005 Feb;22(2):65-73.

18.

The use of anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicle count to predict the potential of oocytes and embryos.

Majumder K, Gelbaya TA, Laing I, Nardo LG.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Jun;150(2):166-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.029.

PMID:
20223579
19.

Prognostic value of some ovarian reserve tests in poor responders.

Vladimirov IK, Tacheva DM, Kalinov KB, Ivanova AV, Blagoeva VD.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005 Jun;272(1):74-9.

PMID:
15660265
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center