Similar articles for PMID: 16872320

Year	Number of Results
1957	1
1976	1
1986	1
1988	1
1989	1
1990	1
1991	1
1994	1
1995	2
1997	1
1998	3
1999	2
2000	4
2001	1
2002	5
2003	1
2004	2
2005	7
2006	9
2007	20
2008	17
2009	18
2010	2
2011	3
2012	3
2013	3
2014	2
2015	3
2016	2
2017	2
2018	3
2019	6
2020	4
2021	3
2022	1
2024	0

1

Survey of consent practices for inpatient colonoscopy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at a tertiary referral center.

Seow CH, Leber JM, Ee HC, Yusoff IF. Seow CH, et al. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Aug;21(8):1340-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04152.x. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006. PMID: 16872320

2

Consenting patients for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: results of a survey of 182 UK endoscopists and 2059 of their patients.

Williams EJ, Hamlyn A, Logan RF, Martin D, Wilkinson ML, Lombard M. Williams EJ, et al. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Dec;21(12):1351-7. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328305e175. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009. PMID: 19525853

3

Complications of ERCP: ethical obligations and legal consequences.

Rácz I, Rejchrt S, Hassan M. Rácz I, et al. Dig Dis. 2008;26(1):49-55. doi: 10.1159/000109387. Epub 2008 Feb 15. Dig Dis. 2008. PMID: 18600016 Review.

4

Colonoscopy practice in Italy: a prospective survey on behalf of the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists.

Radaelli F, Meucci G, Minoli G; Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists (AIGO). Radaelli F, et al. Dig Liver Dis. 2008 Nov;40(11):897-904. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.02.021. Epub 2008 Apr 18. Dig Liver Dis. 2008. PMID: 18395500

5

Post-ERCP pancreatitis rates do not differ between needle-knife and pull-type pancreatic sphincterotomy techniques: a multiendoscopist 13-year experience.

Lawrence C, Romagnuolo J, Cotton PB, Payne KM, Hawes RH. Lawrence C, et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jun;69(7):1271-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.10.015. Epub 2009 Feb 25. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009. PMID: 19246037

6

Are patients informed when they consent to ERCP?

O'Sullivan S, Crippen C, Ponich T. O'Sullivan S, et al. Can J Gastroenterol. 2002 Mar;16(3):154-8. doi: 10.1155/2002/573627. Can J Gastroenterol. 2002. PMID: 11930192

7

Informed consent in direct access colonoscopy.

Segarajasingam DS, Pawlik J, Forbes GM. Segarajasingam DS, et al. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Dec;22(12):2081-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.04461.x. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007. PMID: 18031364

8

Endoscopy in the elderly: a review of the efficacy and safety of colonoscopy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Jafri SM, Monkemuller K, Lukens FJ. Jafri SM, et al. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Mar;44(3):161-6. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181c64d64. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010. PMID: 20042871 Review.

9

Quality indicators, including complications, of ERCP in a community setting: a prospective study.

Colton JB, Curran CC. Colton JB, et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Sep;70(3):457-67. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.11.022. Epub 2009 May 30. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009. PMID: 19482278

10

Case volume and outcome of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: results of a nationwide Austrian benchmarking project.

Kapral C, Duller C, Wewalka F, Kerstan E, Vogel W, Schreiber F. Kapral C, et al. Endoscopy. 2008 Aug;40(8):625-30. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1077461. Endoscopy. 2008. PMID: 18680074

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

128 results

Results by year