Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 101

1.

CT colonography in a Korean population with a high residue diet: comparison between wet and dry preparations.

Kim SH, Choi BI, Han JK, Lee JM, Eun HW, Lee JY, Lee KH, Han CJ, Choi YH, Shin KS.

Clin Radiol. 2006 Jun;61(6):483-94.

PMID:
16713419
2.

Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps.

Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, Mangiapane F, Lamazza A, Schillaci A, Sinibaldi G, Murakami T, Sammartino P, Hori M, Piacentini F, Nofroni I, Stipa V, Passariello R.

Gastroenterology. 2004 Nov;127(5):1300-11.

PMID:
15520999
3.

National CT colonography trial (ACRIN 6664): comparison of three full-laxative bowel preparations in more than 2500 average-risk patients.

Hara AK, Kuo MD, Blevins M, Chen MH, Yee J, Dachman A, Menias CO, Siewert B, Cheema JI, Obregon RG, Fidler JL, Zimmerman P, Horton KM, Coakley K, Iyer RB, Halvorsen RA Jr, Casola G, Johnson CD.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 May;196(5):1076-82. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4334.

4.

Comparison between CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema for colonic evaluation in patients with renal insufficiency.

Chung SY, Park SH, Lee SS, Lee JH, Kim AY, Park SK, Han DJ, Ha HK.

Korean J Radiol. 2012 May-Jun;13(3):290-9. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2012.13.3.290.

5.

CT colonography without cathartic preparation: positive predictive value and patient experience in clinical practice.

Zueco Zueco C, Sobrido Sampedro C, Corroto JD, Rodriguez Fernández P, Fontanillo Fontanillo M.

Eur Radiol. 2012 Jun;22(6):1195-204. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2367-0.

PMID:
22246146
6.
7.

The efficacy of intravenous contrast-enhanced 16-raw multidetector CT colonography for detecting patients with colorectal polyps in an asymptomatic population in Korea.

Kim YS, Kim N, Kim SH, Park MJ, Lim SH, Yim JY, Cho KR, Kim SS, Kim DH, Eun HW, Cho KS, Kim JH, Choi BI, Jung HC, Song IS, Shin CS, Cho SH, Oh BH.

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008 Aug;42(7):791-8. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31811edcb7.

PMID:
18580500
8.

Evaluation of two minimal-preparation regimes for CT colonography: optimising image quality and patient acceptability.

Pollentine A, Mortimer A, McCoubrie P, Archer L.

Br J Radiol. 2012 Aug;85(1016):1085-92. doi: 10.1259/bjr/22421731.

9.

Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fiber diet and stool tagging: a pilot study.

Dachman AH, Dawson DO, Lefere P, Yoshida H, Khan NU, Cipriani N, Rubin DT.

Abdom Imaging. 2007 Jan-Feb;32(1):96-104.

PMID:
16969601
10.

Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy or barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer in older symptomatic patients: two multicentre randomised trials with economic evaluation (the SIGGAR trials).

Halligan S, Dadswell E, Wooldrage K, Wardle J, von Wagner C, Lilford R, Yao GL, Zhu S, Atkin W.

Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jul;19(54):1-134. doi: 10.3310/hta19540.

11.

[Application of CT colonography in diagnosis of colonic polyps].

Pan WD, Qin MW, Xue HD, Liu XH, Qian JM, Yang AM.

Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2006 Feb;28(1):88-92. Chinese.

12.

Bowel cleansing before CT colonography: comparison between two minimal-preparation regimens.

Iafrate F, Iannitti M, Ciolina M, Baldassari P, Pichi A, Laghi A.

Eur Radiol. 2015 Jan;25(1):203-10. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3345-0.

PMID:
25149295
13.

Reduced cathartic bowel preparation for CT colonography: prospective comparison of 2-L polyethylene glycol and magnesium citrate.

Keedy AW, Yee J, Aslam R, Weinstein S, Landeras LA, Shah JN, McQuaid KR, Yeh BM.

Radiology. 2011 Oct;261(1):156-64. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110217.

14.

Performance of a previously validated CT colonography computer-aided detection system in a new patient population.

Summers RM, Handwerker LR, Pickhardt PJ, Van Uitert RL, Deshpande KK, Yeshwant S, Yao J, Franaszek M.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Jul;191(1):168-74. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3354.

PMID:
18562741
15.

Low-dose CT colonography in children: initial experience, technical feasibility, and utility.

Anupindi S, Perumpillichira J, Jaramillo D, Zalis ME, Israel EJ.

Pediatr Radiol. 2005 May;35(5):518-24. Erratum in: Pediatr Radiol. 2005 Jul;35(7):733.

PMID:
15789249
16.

Detection of flat colorectal polyps at screening CT colonography in comparison with conventional polypoid lesions.

Sakamoto T, Mitsuzaki K, Utsunomiya D, Matsuda K, Yamamura S, Urata J, Kawakami M, Yamashita Y.

Acta Radiol. 2012 Sep 1;53(7):714-9. doi: 10.1258/ar.2012.110685.

PMID:
22821957
17.

Diagnostic accuracy of laxative-free computed tomographic colonography for detection of adenomatous polyps in asymptomatic adults: a prospective evaluation.

Zalis ME, Blake MA, Cai W, Hahn PF, Halpern EF, Kazam IG, Keroack M, Magee C, Näppi JJ, Perez-Johnston R, Saltzman JR, Vij A, Yee J, Yoshida H.

Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 15;156(10):692-702. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-10-201205150-00005.

PMID:
22586008
18.

Polyethylene glycol solution (PEG) plus contrast medium vs PEG alone preparation for CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy in preoperative colorectal cancer staging.

Nagata K, Endo S, Ichikawa T, Dasai K, Moriya K, Kushihashi T, Kudo SE.

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Jan;22(1):69-76.

PMID:
16583194
19.

Computer-aided detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography using a Hessian matrix-based algorithm: preliminary study.

Kim SH, Lee JM, Lee JG, Kim JH, Lefere PA, Han JK, Choi BI.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Jul;189(1):41-51.

PMID:
17579150
20.

Conspicuity of colorectal polyps at CT colonography: visual assessment, CAD performance, and the important role of polyp height.

Summers RM, Frentz SM, Liu J, Yao J, Brown L, Louie A, Barlow DS, Jensen DW, Dwyer AJ, Pickhardt PJ, Petrick N.

Acad Radiol. 2009 Jan;16(1):4-14. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.06.007.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center