Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 720

1.

A prospective, open-label study to assess the clinical performance of a foam dressing in the management of chronic wounds.

Zoellner P, Kapp H, Smola H.

Ostomy Wound Manage. 2006 May;52(5):34-6, 38, 40-2 passim.

2.

Split-thickness skin graft donor site management. A randomized prospective trial comparing a hydrophilic polyurethane absorbent foam dressing with a petrolatum gauze dressing.

Weber RS, Hankins P, Limitone E, Callender D, Frankenthaler RM, Wolf P, Goepfert H.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995 Oct;121(10):1145-9.

PMID:
7546582
3.

Evaluation of a new polyurethane foam dressing.

Banks V, Bale S, Harding K, Harding EF.

J Wound Care. 1997 Jun;6(6):266-9.

PMID:
9274262
4.
6.

Clinical experience with an antimicrobial hydrogel dressing on recalcitrant wounds.

Wood L, Wood Z, Davis P, Wilkins J.

J Wound Care. 2010 Jul;19(7):287-8, 290-3.

PMID:
20616771
7.

Clinical effectiveness of alginate silver dressing in outpatient management of partial-thickness burns.

Opasanon S, Muangman P, Namviriyachote N.

Int Wound J. 2010 Dec;7(6):467-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00718.x. Epub 2010 Sep 21.

PMID:
20860635
8.
9.

Clinical evaluation of TIELLE* Plus dressing in the management of exuding chronic wounds.

Schulze HJ.

Br J Community Nurs. 2003;8(11 Suppl):18-22.

PMID:
15115220
10.

Clinical performance of a hydrogel dressing in chronic wounds: a prospective observational study.

Zoellner P, Kapp H, Smola H.

J Wound Care. 2007 Mar;16(3):133-6.

PMID:
17385591
11.

An evaluation of an adhesive hydrocellular foam dressing and a self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing in a nursing home setting.

Viamontes L, Temple D, Wytall D, Walker A.

Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003 Aug;49(8):48-52, 54-6, 58.

12.
13.
14.

Suprathel, a new skin substitute, in the management of partial-thickness burn wounds: results of a clinical study.

Schwarze H, Küntscher M, Uhlig C, Hierlemann H, Prantl L, Ottomann C, Hartmann B.

Ann Plast Surg. 2008 Feb;60(2):181-5. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318056bbf6. Erratum in: Ann Plast Surg. 2008 Apr;60(4):415.

PMID:
18216512
15.

[Experimental in vitro evaluation of the absorption capacity and control of exudate of 3 wound healing dressings].

Torra i Bou JE, Cortés i Borra A, Manresa i Domínguez JM.

Rev Enferm. 1998 Oct;21(242):suppl 2-8. Spanish.

PMID:
10030154
16.

Using a silver-coated polymeric substrate for the management of chronic ulcerations: the initial Mayo Clinic experience.

Moore RA, Liedl DA, Jenkins S, Andrews KL.

Adv Skin Wound Care. 2008 Nov;21(11):517-20. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000323579.87700.ec.

PMID:
18981754
17.

Patient's pain feedback using negative pressure wound therapy with foam and gauze.

Fraccalvieri M, Ruka E, Bocchiotti MA, Zingarelli E, Bruschi S.

Int Wound J. 2011 Oct;8(5):492-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00821.x. Epub 2011 Aug 9.

PMID:
21827628
18.

A polyurethane dressing is beneficial for split-thickness skin-graft donor wound healing.

Akita S, Akino K, Imaizumi T, Tanaka K, Anraku K, Yano H, Hirano A.

Burns. 2006 Jun;32(4):447-51. Epub 2006 Apr 18.

PMID:
16621321
19.

Impact of gauze-based NPWT on the patient and nursing experience in the treatment of challenging wounds.

Hurd T, Chadwick P, Cote J, Cockwill J, Mole TR, Smith JM.

Int Wound J. 2010 Dec;7(6):448-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00714.x.

PMID:
20673256
20.

Evidence review: the clinical benefits of Safetac technology in wound care.

Davies P, Rippon M.

J Wound Care. 2008 Nov;Suppl:3-31. Review.

PMID:
19252457

Supplemental Content

Support Center