Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 133

2.

Intra-cluster and inter-period correlation coefficients for cross-sectional cluster randomised controlled trials for type-2 diabetes in UK primary care.

Martin J, Girling A, Nirantharakumar K, Ryan R, Marshall T, Hemming K.

Trials. 2016 Aug 15;17:402. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1532-9.

3.

Patterns of intra-cluster correlation from primary care research to inform study design and analysis.

Adams G, Gulliford MC, Ukoumunne OC, Eldridge S, Chinn S, Campbell MJ.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;57(8):785-94. Review.

PMID:
15485730
4.
6.

Design of cluster-randomized trials of quality improvement interventions aimed at medical care providers.

Glynn RJ, Brookhart MA, Stedman M, Avorn J, Solomon DH.

Med Care. 2007 Oct;45(10 Supl 2):S38-43.

PMID:
17909381
7.

Associations between structural capabilities of primary care practices and performance on selected quality measures.

Friedberg MW, Coltin KL, Safran DG, Dresser M, Zaslavsky AM, Schneider EC.

Ann Intern Med. 2009 Oct 6;151(7):456-63.

PMID:
19805769
8.
9.

Health monitoring in sentinel practice networks: the contribution of primary care.

Fleming DM, Schellevis FG, Paget WJ.

Eur J Public Health. 2003 Sep;13(3 Suppl):80-4.

PMID:
14533754
10.

Achievement of metabolic targets for diabetes by English primary care practices under a new system of incentives.

Gulliford MC, Ashworth M, Robotham D, Mohiddin A.

Diabet Med. 2007 May;24(5):505-11. Epub 2007 Mar 22.

PMID:
17381507
11.

Intraclass correlation coefficient and outcome prevalence are associated in clustered binary data.

Gulliford MC, Adams G, Ukoumunne OC, Latinovic R, Chinn S, Campbell MJ.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Mar;58(3):246-51.

PMID:
15718113
12.

Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.

Taljaard M, Donner A, Klar N.

Biom J. 2008 Jun;50(3):329-45. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200710423. Review.

PMID:
18537126
13.

Characterizing a practice-based research network: Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network (ORPRN) survey tools.

Fagnan LJ, Morris C, Shipman SA, Holub J, King A, Angier H.

J Am Board Fam Med. 2007 Mar-Apr;20(2):204-19.

14.

Inter-practice variation in diagnosing hypertension and diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study in general practice.

Nielen MM, Schellevis FG, Verheij RA.

BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Jan 21;10:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-6.

15.
16.

Improving outcomes for high-risk diabetics using information systems.

Orzano AJ, Strickland PO, Tallia AF, Hudson S, Balasubramanian B, Nutting PA, Crabtree BF.

J Am Board Fam Med. 2007 May-Jun;20(3):245-51.

17.

Implementing a national quality assurance system for diabetes care: the Scottish Diabetes Survey 2001-2006.

McKnight JA, Morris AD, Cline D, Peden N, Fischbacher C, Wild S; Scottish Diabetes Survey Monitoring Group.

Diabet Med. 2008 Jun;25(6):743-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02453.x.

PMID:
18544111
18.

A psychosocial taxonomy of patients with diabetes: validation in a primary care setting.

Guck TP, Banfield MA, Tran SM, Levy JF, Goodman MD, Barone EJ, Goeser AL.

Diabet Med. 2008 Jun;25(6):716-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02442.x. Epub 2008 Apr 23.

PMID:
18435779
20.

Practice systems are associated with high-quality care for diabetes.

Solberg LI, Asche SE, Pawlson LG, Scholle SH, Shih SC.

Am J Manag Care. 2008 Feb;14(2):85-92.

Supplemental Content

Support Center