Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 77

1.

Systematic reviews: when is an update an update?

Moher D, Tsertsvadze A.

Lancet. 2006 Mar 18;367(9514):881-3. No abstract available.

PMID:
16546523
2.

When and how to update systematic reviews.

Moher D, Tsertsvadze A, Tricco AC, Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Sampson M, Barrowman N.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):MR000023. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000023.pub3. Review.

PMID:
18254126
3.

Time to update and quantitative changes in the results of cochrane pregnancy and childbirth reviews.

Jaidee W, Moher D, Laopaiboon M.

PLoS One. 2010 Jul 13;5(7):e11553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011553.

4.

Converting systematic reviews to Cochrane format: a cross-sectional survey of Australian authors of systematic reviews.

Piehl JH, Green S, McDonald S.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2003 Jan 17;3(1):2. Epub 2003 Jan 17.

5.

An encouraging assessment of methods to inform priorities for updating systematic reviews.

Sutton AJ, Donegan S, Takwoingi Y, Garner P, Gamble C, Donald A.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Mar;62(3):241-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 Sep 10.

PMID:
18783919
6.

Cochrane reviews in rehabilitation: 2nd issue 2008 the EJPRM systematic continuous update.

Zaina F.

Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008 Sep;44(3):283-6. Review. No abstract available.

7.

A systematic review identified few methods and strategies describing when and how to update systematic reviews.

Moher D, Tsertsvadze A, Tricco AC, Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Sampson M, Barrowman N.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Nov;60(11):1095-1104. Epub 2007 Aug 3. Review.

PMID:
17938050
8.

Locating and appraising systematic reviews.

Hunt DL, McKibbon KA.

Ann Intern Med. 1997 Apr 1;126(7):532-8.

PMID:
9092319
9.

Assessment of a method to detect signals for updating systematic reviews.

Shekelle PG, Motala A, Johnsen B, Newberry SJ.

Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 14;3:13. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-13. Erratum in: Syst Rev. 2014;3:22.

10.

How to write a Cochrane systematic review.

Henderson LK, Craig JC, Willis NS, Tovey D, Webster AC.

Nephrology (Carlton). 2010 Sep;15(6):617-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2010.01380.x.

PMID:
20883282
11.

[Systematic reviews, an update].

Scholten RJ.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2009 May 2;153(18):866-9. Review. Dutch. No abstract available.

PMID:
19475866
12.

Up-to-dateness of reviews is often neglected in overviews: a systematic review.

Pieper D, Antoine SL, Neugebauer EA, Eikermann M.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;67(12):1302-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Oct 1. Review.

13.

Systematic reviews in bioethics: types, challenges, and value.

McDougall R.

J Med Philos. 2014 Feb;39(1):89-97. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jht059. Epub 2013 Dec 14.

PMID:
24334289
14.

Empty reviews: a description and consideration of Cochrane systematic reviews with no included studies.

Yaffe J, Montgomery P, Hopewell S, Shepard LD.

PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036626. Epub 2012 May 4.

15.

Assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2008.

MacDonald SL, Canfield SE, Fesperman SF, Dahm P.

J Urol. 2010 Aug;184(2):648-53. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.127. Epub 2010 Jun 19. Review.

PMID:
20639030
16.
17.

Surveillance search techniques identified the need to update systematic reviews.

Sampson M, Shojania KG, McGowan J, Daniel R, Rader T, Iansavichene AE, Ji J, Ansari MT, Moher D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Aug;61(8):755-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.003. Epub 2008 Feb 14.

PMID:
18586179
18.

Publication bias in animal research: a systematic review protocol.

Briel M, Müller KF, Meerpohl JJ, von Elm E, Lang B, Motschall E, Gloy V, Lamontagne F, Schwarzer G, Bassler D; OPEN Consortium.

Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 27;2:23. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-23.

19.

Studying the potential impact of automated document classification on scheduling a systematic review update.

Cohen AM, Ambert K, McDonagh M.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Apr 19;12:33. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-33.

20.

2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group.

Furlan AD, Pennick V, Bombardier C, van Tulder M; Editorial Board, Cochrane Back Review Group.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 15;34(18):1929-41. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b1c99f.

PMID:
19680101

Supplemental Content

Support Center