Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 913

1.

Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case.

Sox HC, Rennie D.

Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 18;144(8):609-13. Epub 2006 Mar 6.

PMID:
16522625
2.

Scientific misconduct and correcting the scientific literature.

Parrish DM.

Acad Med. 1999 Mar;74(3):221-30. Erratum in: Acad Med 1999 Jun;74(6):621.

PMID:
10099640
3.

Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008.

Wager E, Williams P.

J Med Ethics. 2011 Sep;37(9):567-70. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.040964. Epub 2011 Apr 12.

PMID:
21486985
4.

Retracted publications in the drug literature.

Samp JC, Schumock GT, Pickard AS.

Pharmacotherapy. 2012 Jul;32(7):586-95. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.2012.01100.x. Epub 2012 May 11.

PMID:
22581659
5.

Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?

Steen RG.

J Med Ethics. 2011 Feb;37(2):113-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.038125. Epub 2010 Nov 15.

PMID:
21081306
6.

Role of the journal editor in sustaining integrity in research.

Caelleigh AS.

Acad Med. 1993 Sep;68(9 Suppl):S23-9.

PMID:
8373488
7.

Ethical and legal considerations in a case of research fraud.

Kvaal SI.

J Am Coll Dent. 2008 Summer;75(2):29-35.

PMID:
18777891
8.

Correcting the literature following fraudulent publication.

Friedman PJ.

JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1416-9.

PMID:
2406474
9.

Scientific journals and their authors' financial interests: a pilot study.

Krimsky S, Rothenberg LS, Stott P, Kyle G.

Psychother Psychosom. 1998 Jul-Oct;67(4-5):194-201.

PMID:
9693346
10.

Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail.

Couzin J, Unger K.

Science. 2006 Apr 7;312(5770):38-43. No abstract available.

PMID:
16601164
11.

Fraud. The journal's role concerning fraudulent research.

Sharp DW.

Invest Radiol. 1991 Jun;26(6):586-9. No abstract available.

PMID:
1860767
12.

Fate of articles that warranted retraction due to ethical concerns: a descriptive cross-sectional study.

Elia N, Wager E, Tramèr MR.

PLoS One. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e85846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085846. eCollection 2014.

13.

Empirical developments in retraction.

Redman BK, Yarandi HN, Merz JF.

J Med Ethics. 2008 Nov;34(11):807-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.023069.

PMID:
18974415
14.

Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings.

Resnik DB, Dinse GE.

J Med Ethics. 2013 Jan;39(1):46-50. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100766. Epub 2012 Sep 1.

15.

Data integrity, reliability and fraud in medical research.

Baerlocher MO, O'Brien J, Newton M, Gautam T, Noble J.

Eur J Intern Med. 2010 Feb;21(1):40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2009.11.002. Epub 2009 Nov 26.

PMID:
20122612
16.

Preventing scientific fraud.

Garrel DR, Rabasa-Lhoret R, Boyle P.

Ann Intern Med. 2006 Sep 19;145(6):473; author reply 473-4. No abstract available.

PMID:
16983141
17.

Recognition, reward and responsibility: why the authorship of scientific papers matters.

Wager E.

Maturitas. 2009 Feb 20;62(2):109-12. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.12.001. Epub 2009 Jan 14.

PMID:
19147308
18.

The continued use of retracted, invalid scientific literature.

Pfeifer MP, Snodgrass GL.

JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1420-3.

PMID:
2406475
19.

NLM's practices for handling errata and retractions.

Kotzin S, Schuyler PL.

Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1989 Oct;77(4):337-42.

20.

Our silent enemy: ashes in our libraries.

DeBakey L, DeBakey S.

Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1989 Jul;77(3):258-68.

Supplemental Content

Support Center