Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 1130

1.

Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.

Nie K, Barco A, Zeng FG.

Ear Hear. 2006 Apr;27(2):208-17.

PMID:
16518146
2.
3.
4.

Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing.

Kong YY, Cruz R, Jones JA, Zeng FG.

Ear Hear. 2004 Apr;25(2):173-85.

PMID:
15064662
5.

Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners.

Zeng FG, Galvin JJ 3rd.

Ear Hear. 1999 Feb;20(1):60-74.

PMID:
10037066
6.

Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.

Firszt JB, Holden LK, Skinner MW, Tobey EA, Peterson A, Gaggl W, Runge-Samuelson CL, Wackym PA.

Ear Hear. 2004 Aug;25(4):375-87.

PMID:
15292777
7.

Spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition in noise.

Xu L, Zheng Y.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Sep;122(3):1758.

PMID:
17927435
8.

Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Aug;110(2):1150-63.

PMID:
11519582
9.

Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.

Laszig R, Aschendorff A, Stecker M, Müller-Deile J, Maune S, Dillier N, Weber B, Hey M, Begall K, Lenarz T, Battmer RD, Böhm M, Steffens T, Strutz J, Linder T, Probst R, Allum J, Westhofen M, Doering W.

Otol Neurotol. 2004 Nov;25(6):958-68.

PMID:
15547426
10.

Speech recognition by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners as a function of intensity resolution.

Loizou PC, Dorman M, Poroy O, Spahr T.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Nov;108(5 Pt 1):2377-87.

PMID:
11108378
11.

Speech understanding in noise with a Med-El COMBI 40+ cochlear implant using reduced channel sets.

Garnham C, O'Driscoll M, Ramsden And R, Saeed S.

Ear Hear. 2002 Dec;23(6):540-52.

PMID:
12476091
12.
13.

Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.

Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Ricketts TA, Labadie RF, Haynes DS.

Ear Hear. 2007 Aug;28(4):524-41.

PMID:
17609614
14.

Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources.

Ricketts TA, Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Haynes DS, Labadie RF.

Ear Hear. 2006 Dec;27(6):763-73.

PMID:
17086085
16.

Effects of stimulation rate with the Nucleus 24 ACE speech coding strategy.

Holden LK, Skinner MW, Holden TA, Demorest ME.

Ear Hear. 2002 Oct;23(5):463-76.

PMID:
12411779
17.
18.

Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.

Fu QJ, Shannon RV, Wang X.

J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Dec;104(6):3586-96.

PMID:
9857517
19.

Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor.

Loizou PC, Stickney G, Mishra L, Assmann P.

Ear Hear. 2003 Feb;24(1):12-9.

PMID:
12598809
20.

Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.

Laback B, Pok SM, Baumgartner WD, Deutsch WA, Schmid K.

Ear Hear. 2004 Oct;25(5):488-500.

PMID:
15599195

Supplemental Content

Support Center