Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 165

1.

Visual attention in deaf and normal hearing adults: effects of stimulus compatibility.

Sladen DP, Tharpe AM, Ashmead DH, Wesley Grantham D, Chun MM.

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Dec;48(6):1529-37.

PMID:
16478388
2.

Responses to targets in the visual periphery in deaf and normal-hearing adults.

Rothpletz AM, Ashmead DH, Thorpe AM.

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003 Dec;46(6):1378-86.

PMID:
14700362
3.

The effect of implantation age on visual attention skills.

Yucel E, Derim D.

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Jun;72(6):869-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.02.017. Epub 2008 Apr 18.

PMID:
18395272
4.
5.

Flanker and negative flanker effects in letter identification.

Rouder JN, King JW.

Percept Psychophys. 2003 Feb;65(2):287-97.

PMID:
12713244
6.

Parafoveal attention in congenitally deaf and hearing young adults.

Parasnis I, Samar VJ.

Brain Cogn. 1985 Jul;4(3):313-27.

PMID:
4027064
9.

Visual attention and hearing loss: past and current perspectives.

Tharpe AM, Ashmead D, Sladen DP, Ryan HA, Rothpletz AM.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 Nov-Dec;19(10):741-7. Review.

PMID:
19358454
10.

Visual analyses and discriminations: one approach to measuring students' metacognition.

Al-Hilawani YA.

Am Ann Deaf. 2006 Spring;151(1):16-24.

PMID:
16856642
11.

Are vertical meridian effects due to audio-visual interference? A new confirmation with deaf subjects.

Belardinelli MO, Santangelo V, Botta F, Federici S.

Disabil Rehabil. 2007 May 30;29(10):797-804.

PMID:
17457738
12.

Differences in visual search tasks between congenitally deaf and normally hearing adults.

Stivalet P, Moreno Y, Richard J, Barraud PA, Raphel C.

Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1998 Jan;6(3):227-32.

PMID:
9479074
13.

Do deaf people see better? Texture segmentation and visual search compensate in adult but not in juvenile subjects.

Rettenbach R, Diller G, Sireteanu R.

J Cogn Neurosci. 1999 Sep;11(5):560-83.

PMID:
10511644
14.

Anticipated action consequences as a nexus between action and perception: evidence from event-related potentials.

Nikolaev AR, Ziessler M, Dimova K, van Leeuwen C.

Biol Psychol. 2008 Apr;78(1):53-65. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.12.010. Epub 2008 Jan 9.

PMID:
18289769
15.

Higher free testosterone level is associated with faster visual processing and more flanker interference in older men.

Van Strien JW, Weber RF, Burdorf A, Bangma C.

Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009 May;34(4):546-54. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.020. Epub 2008 Nov 29.

PMID:
19042092
16.

Perceptual factors affecting age-related differences in focused attention: performance and psychophysiological analyses.

Zeef EJ, Sonke CJ, Kok A, Buiten MM, Kenemans JL.

Psychophysiology. 1996 Sep;33(5):555-65.

PMID:
8854743
17.
18.

Altered spatial distribution of visual attention in near and far space after early deafness.

Chen Q, He G, Chen K, Jin Z, Mo L.

Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jul;48(9):2693-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.05.016. Epub 2010 May 15.

PMID:
20478322
19.

Enhanced reactivity to visual stimuli in deaf individuals.

Bottari D, Nava E, Ley P, Pavani F.

Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2010;28(2):167-79. doi: 10.3233/RNN-2010-0502.

PMID:
20404406
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center