Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 104

1.

Gauze packing of open surgical wounds: empirical or evidence-based practice?

Dinah F, Adhikari A.

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006 Jan;88(1):33-6. Review.

3.

Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.

Ubbink DT, Vermeulen H, Goossens A, Kelner RB, Schreuder SM, Lubbers MJ.

Arch Surg. 2008 Oct;143(10):950-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.10.950.

PMID:
18936373
4.

Modern dressings: healing surgical wounds by secondary intention.

Dziewulski P, James S, Taylor D, Bosanquet N, Cutting K, West P.

Hosp Med. 2003 Sep;64(9):543-7. Review.

PMID:
14521072
5.

Systematic review of dressings and topical agents for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention.

Vermeulen H, Ubbink DT, Goossens A, de Vos R, Legemate DA.

Br J Surg. 2005 Jun;92(6):665-72. Review.

PMID:
15912490
6.

Dressings and topical agents for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention.

Vermeulen H, Ubbink D, Goossens A, de Vos R, Legemate D.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(2):CD003554. Review.

PMID:
15106207
7.

Cost benefits of two dressings in the management of surgical wounds.

Moore PJ, Foster L.

Br J Nurs. 2000 Sep 28-Oct 11;9(17):1128-32.

PMID:
11868167
8.

Comparison of homecare costs of local wound care in surgical patients randomized between occlusive and gauze dressings.

Ubbink DT, Vermeulen H, van Hattem J.

J Clin Nurs. 2008 Mar;17(5):593-601. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02032.x.

PMID:
18279292
9.

Dressings for acute and chronic wounds: a systematic review.

Chaby G, Senet P, Vaneau M, Martel P, Guillaume JC, Meaume S, Téot L, Debure C, Dompmartin A, Bachelet H, Carsin H, Matz V, Richard JL, Rochet JM, Sales-Aussias N, Zagnoli A, Denis C, Guillot B, Chosidow O.

Arch Dermatol. 2007 Oct;143(10):1297-304. Review.

PMID:
17938344
10.

Dressings in the management of open surgical wounds.

Pulman K.

Br J Perioper Nurs. 2004 Aug;14(8):354-60. Review.

PMID:
15378938
11.

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on hydrocolloid occlusive dressing versus conventional gauze dressing in the healing of chronic wounds.

Singh A, Halder S, Menon GR, Chumber S, Misra MC, Sharma LK, Srivastava A.

Asian J Surg. 2004 Oct;27(4):326-32.

12.
13.

Costs of dressings in the community.

Bale S, Hagelstein S, Banks V, Harding KG.

J Wound Care. 1998 Jul;7(7):327-30.

PMID:
9791356
14.

A prospective comparison of a new, synthetic donor site dressing versus an impregnated gauze dressing.

Hickerson WL, Kealey GP, Smith DJ Jr, Thomson PD.

J Burn Care Rehabil. 1994 Jul-Aug;15(4):359-63.

PMID:
7929519
15.

Does sterile or nonsterile technique make a difference in wounds healing by secondary intention?

Lawson C, Juliano L, Ratliff CR.

Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003 Apr;49(4):56-8, 60.

16.

Dressings for the prevention of surgical site infection.

Dumville JC, Walter CJ, Sharp CA, Page T.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 6;(7):CD003091. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003091.pub2. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;9:CD003091.

PMID:
21735390
17.

Clinical evaluation of hydrocolloid dressings for neurosurgical wounds.

Fujimoto Y, Shimooka N, Ohnishi Y, Yoshimine T.

Surg Neurol. 2008 Aug;70(2):217-20; discussion 220. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2007.06.091. Epub 2008 Feb 11.

PMID:
18262632
18.

Comparison of four different dressings on donor site wounds.

Beldon P.

Br J Nurs. 2004 Mar;13(6 Suppl):S38-45.

PMID:
15126974
19.

Acute surgical wound care. 3: Fitting the dressing to the wound.

Foster L, Moore P.

Br J Nurs. 1999 Feb 25-Mar 10;8(4):200-2, 204, 206 passim. Review.

PMID:
10347404
20.

Dressing the part.

Cho CY, Lo JS.

Dermatol Clin. 1998 Jan;16(1):25-47. Review.

PMID:
9460576

Supplemental Content

Support Center