Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 218

1.

Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Menell JH, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Brogi E, Liberman L.

Breast J. 2005 Nov-Dec;11(6):382-90.

PMID:
16297080
2.

Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.

Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, Carter WB, Bhargavan M, Lewis RS, Ioffe OB.

Radiology. 2004 Dec;233(3):830-49. Epub 2004 Oct 14.

PMID:
15486214
3.

Preoperative MRI of pure intraductal breast carcinoma--a valuable adjunct to mammography in assessing cancer extent.

Santamaría G, Velasco M, Farrús B, Zanón G, Fernández PL.

Breast. 2008 Apr;17(2):186-94. Epub 2007 Oct 26.

PMID:
17964786
4.

The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.

Kim JS, Lee SM, Cha ES.

Acta Radiol. 2014 Jul;55(6):668-75. doi: 10.1177/0284185113505086. Epub 2013 Sep 16.

PMID:
24043881
5.

Extension of ductal carcinoma in situ: histopathological association with MR imaging and mammography.

Shiraishi A, Kurosaki Y, Maehara T, Suzuki M, Kurosumi M.

Magn Reson Med Sci. 2003 Dec 31;2(4):159-63.

6.

What is the sensitivity of mammography and dynamic MR imaging for DCIS if the whole-breast histopathology is used as a reference standard?

Sardanelli F, Bacigalupo L, Carbonaro L, Esseridou A, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P, Lattanzio V, Del Maschio A.

Radiol Med. 2008 Apr;113(3):439-51. doi: 10.1007/s11547-008-0250-0. Epub 2008 Jul 9. English, Italian.

PMID:
18414812
7.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI reveals the extent and the microvascular pattern of breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

Santamaría G, Velasco M, Farrús B, Caparrós FX, Fernández PL.

Breast J. 2013 Jul-Aug;19(4):402-10. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12135. Epub 2013 Jun 12.

PMID:
23758454
8.

Sensitivity of breast MRI for ductal carcinoma in situ appearing as microcalcifications only on mammography.

Rinaldi P, Buccheri C, Giuliani M, Bufi E, Romani M, Patrolecco F, Belli P, Bonomo L.

Clin Imaging. 2016 Nov - Dec;40(6):1207-1212. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 6.

PMID:
27618803
9.

Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?

Zuiani C, Francescutti GE, Londero V, Zunnui I, Bazzocchi M.

J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2002 Sep;21(3 Suppl):89-95.

PMID:
12585661
10.

MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study.

Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, Wardelmann E, Leutner CC, Koenig R, Kuhn W, Schild HH.

Lancet. 2007 Aug 11;370(9586):485-92.

PMID:
17693177
11.

Screening-detected calcified and non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the imaging and histopathological features.

Mun HS, Shin HJ, Kim HH, Cha JH, Kim H.

Clin Radiol. 2013 Jan;68(1):e27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Nov 22.

PMID:
23177096
12.
13.

Three-dimensional RODEO breast MR imaging of lesions containing ductal carcinoma in situ.

Soderstrom CE, Harms SE, Copit DS, Evans WP, Savino DA, Krakos PA, Farrell RS Jr, Flamig DP.

Radiology. 1996 Nov;201(2):427-32.

PMID:
8888235
14.

Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic and morphologic MR characteristics compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade.

Jansen SA, Newstead GM, Abe H, Shimauchi A, Schmidt RA, Karczmar GS.

Radiology. 2007 Dec;245(3):684-91.

PMID:
18024450
15.

Role of preoperative breast MRI in ductal carcinoma in situ for prediction of the presence and assessment of the extent of occult invasive component.

Nori J, Meattini I, Giannotti E, Abdulcadir D, Mariscotti G, Calabrese M, Angelino F, Chiesa F, Saieva C, Vanzi E, Boeri C, Bianchi S, Sanchez L, Orzalesi L, Casella D, Susini T, Livi L.

Breast J. 2014 May-Jun;20(3):243-8. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12250.

PMID:
24750509
16.

Breast scintigraphy with breast-specific γ-camera in the detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: a correlation with mammography and histologic subtype.

Spanu A, Sanna D, Chessa F, Cottu P, Manca A, Madeddu G.

J Nucl Med. 2012 Oct;53(10):1528-33. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.103010. Epub 2012 Aug 21.

17.

Improvement in DCIS detection rates by MRI over time in a high-risk breast screening study.

Warner E, Causer PA, Wong JW, Wright FC, Jong RA, Hill KA, Messner SJ, Yaffe MJ, Narod SA, Plewes DB.

Breast J. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):9-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2010.01018.x.

PMID:
21251121
18.

Ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic findings and clinical implications.

Dershaw DD, Abramson A, Kinne DW.

Radiology. 1989 Feb;170(2):411-5.

PMID:
2536185
19.

Predictive values of BI-RADS(®) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Badan GM, Piato S, Roveda D Júnior, de Faria Castro Fleury E.

Eur J Radiol. 2016 Oct;85(10):1701-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Jul 19.

PMID:
27666605
20.

The impact of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on surgical treatment and outcomes for ductal carcinoma in situ.

Itakura K, Lessing J, Sakata T, Heinzerling A, Vriens E, Wisner D, Alvarado M, Esserman L, Ewing C, Hylton N, Hwang ES.

Clin Breast Cancer. 2011 Mar;11(1):33-8. doi: 10.3816/CBC.2011.n.006.

Supplemental Content

Support Center