Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 168

1.

The end of biomedical journals: there is madness in their methods.

Aickin M.

J Altern Complement Med. 2005 Oct;11(5):755-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
16296895
2.

Putting gender on the agenda.

[No authors listed]

Nature. 2010 Jun 10;465(7299):665. doi: 10.1038/465665a. No abstract available.

PMID:
20535156
3.

'Proof' against homeopathy in fact supports Homeopathy.

Rutten L, Stolper E.

Homeopathy. 2006 Jan;95(1):57-61. No abstract available.

PMID:
16399260
4.

What is right and what is wrong about evidence-based medicine?

Julian DG.

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003 Sep;14(9 Suppl):S2-5.

PMID:
12950509
5.

Bias in the trial and reporting of trials of homeopathy: a fundamental breakdown in peer review and standards?

Frass M, Schuster E, Muchitsch I, Duncan J, Gei W, Kozel G, Kastinger-Mayr C, Felleitner AE, Reiter C, Endler C, Oberbaum M.

J Altern Complement Med. 2005 Oct;11(5):780-2. No abstract available.

PMID:
16296904
6.

Sir: is that bias?

Reilly D.

J Altern Complement Med. 2005 Oct;11(5):785. No abstract available.

PMID:
16296907
7.

Shang et al. carelessness, collusion, or conspiracy?

Peters D.

J Altern Complement Med. 2005 Oct;11(5):779-80. No abstract available.

PMID:
16296903
8.

Understanding placebo effects in homeopathic clinical trials.

Thompson T, Weiss M.

J Altern Complement Med. 2005 Oct;11(5):784. No abstract available.

PMID:
16296906
9.

Failure to exclude false negative bias: a fundamental flaw in the trial of Shang et al.

Kiene H, Kienle GS, von Schön-Angerer T.

J Altern Complement Med. 2005 Oct;11(5):783. No abstract available.

PMID:
16296905
10.

The pitfalls of narrative reviews in clinical medicine.

Williams CJ.

Ann Oncol. 1998 Jun;9(6):601-5. No abstract available.

PMID:
9681072
11.

What end is this anyway?

Rosenbaum P.

Homeopathy. 2006 Jan;95(1):55-6. No abstract available.

PMID:
16399258
12.

A systematic review of how homeopathy is represented in conventional and CAM peer reviewed journals.

Caulfield T, DeBow S.

BMC Complement Altern Med. 2005 Jun 14;5:12. Review. Erratum in: BMC Complement Altern Med. 2008;8:31.

13.

Evidence needs to be translated, whether or not it is complete.

Dacks PA, Bennett DA, Fillit HM.

JAMA Neurol. 2014 Feb;71(2):137-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.5376. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
24297103
14.

Is homeopathy a clinically valuable approach?

Ernst E.

Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2005 Nov;26(11):547-8.

PMID:
16165225
15.

Assessing research results in the medical literature: trust but verify.

Califf RM, McCall J, Harrington RA.

JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jun 24;173(12):1053-5. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.829. No abstract available.

PMID:
23609490
16.

Issues in subgroup analyses and meta-analyses of clinical trials.

Bigger JT.

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003 Sep;14(9 Suppl):S6-8.

PMID:
12950510
17.

Consideration of medical research vs. scientific research.

Pyle DE.

Med Hypotheses. 2005;65(6):1199. No abstract available.

PMID:
16144744
18.

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Methodology for Conducting Systematic Reviews for the Evidence Analysis Library.

Handu D, Moloney L, Wolfram T, Ziegler P, Acosta A, Steiber A.

J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016 Feb;116(2):311-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2015.11.008. No abstract available.

PMID:
26822985
19.

Understanding evidence-based arthroscopy.

Lubowitz JH.

Arthroscopy. 2004 Jan;20(1):1-3. No abstract available.

PMID:
16187451
20.

[Methodological basis for evidence-based medicine].

Windeler J.

Gesundheitswesen. 2008 Jul;70(7):418-27; quiz 428. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-986350. Review. German. No abstract available.

PMID:
18729032

Supplemental Content

Support Center