Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 603

1.

Monitoring stress-related genes during the process of biomass propagation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains used for wine making.

Pérez-Torrado R, Bruno-Bárcena JM, Matallana E.

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Nov;71(11):6831-7.

2.

Fermentative capacity of dry active wine yeast requires a specific oxidative stress response during industrial biomass growth.

Pérez-Torrado R, Gómez-Pastor R, Larsson C, Matallana E.

Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009 Jan;81(5):951-60. doi: 10.1007/s00253-008-1722-9. Epub 2008 Oct 3.

PMID:
18836715
3.

Modification of the TRX2 gene dose in Saccharomyces cerevisiae affects hexokinase 2 gene regulation during wine yeast biomass production.

Gómez-Pastor R, Pérez-Torrado R, Matallana E.

Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012 May;94(3):773-87. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3738-9. Epub 2012 Jan 6.

PMID:
22223102
4.

Analysis of the stress resistance of commercial wine yeast strains.

Carrasco P, Querol A, del Olmo M.

Arch Microbiol. 2001 Jun;175(6):450-7.

PMID:
11491086
5.

Expression of stress response genes in wine strains with different fermentative behavior.

Zuzuarregui A, del Olmo ML.

FEMS Yeast Res. 2004 May;4(7):699-710. Erratum in: FEMS Yeast Res. 2004 Dec;5(3):297.

6.

An inverse correlation between stress resistance and stuck fermentations in wine yeasts. A molecular study.

Ivorra C, Pérez-Ortín JE, del Olmo M.

Biotechnol Bioeng. 1999 Sep 20;64(6):698-708.

PMID:
10417219
7.

Proteomic evolution of a wine yeast during the first hours of fermentation.

Salvadó Z, Chiva R, Rodríguez-Vargas S, Rández-Gil F, Mas A, Guillamón JM.

FEMS Yeast Res. 2008 Nov;8(7):1137-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00389.x. Epub 2008 May 22.

8.

Analysis of the expression of some stress induced genes in several commercial wine yeast strains at the beginning of vinification.

Zuzuarregui A, Carrasco P, Palacios A, Julien A, del Olmo M.

J Appl Microbiol. 2005;98(2):299-307.

9.

Oxidative stress responses and lipid peroxidation damage are induced during dehydration in the production of dry active wine yeasts.

Garre E, Raginel F, Palacios A, Julien A, Matallana E.

Int J Food Microbiol. 2010 Jan 1;136(3):295-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.10.018. Epub 2009 Oct 28.

PMID:
19914726
10.

Comparative analysis of transcriptional responses to saline stress in the laboratory and brewing strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with DNA microarray.

Hirasawa T, Nakakura Y, Yoshikawa K, Ashitani K, Nagahisa K, Furusawa C, Katakura Y, Shimizu H, Shioya S.

Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006 Apr;70(3):346-57. Epub 2005 Nov 11.

PMID:
16283296
11.

Early transcriptional response of wine yeast after rehydration: osmotic shock and metabolic activation.

Novo M, Beltran G, Rozes N, Guillamon JM, Sokol S, Leberre V, François J, Mas A.

FEMS Yeast Res. 2007 Mar;7(2):304-16. Epub 2006 Nov 21.

12.

Genetic manipulation of HSP26 and YHR087W stress genes may improve fermentative behaviour in wine yeasts under vinification conditions.

Jiménez-Martí E, Zuzuarregui A, Ridaura I, Lozano N, del Olmo M.

Int J Food Microbiol. 2009 Mar 31;130(2):122-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.01.017. Epub 2009 Jan 24.

PMID:
19217680
13.
14.
15.

Functional genomic analysis of a commercial wine strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under differing nitrogen conditions.

Backhus LE, DeRisi J, Bisson LF.

FEMS Yeast Res. 2001 Jul;1(2):111-25. Erratum in: FEMS Yeast Res. 2003 Oct;4(1):123.

16.

Transcriptomic and proteomic insights of the wine yeast biomass propagation process.

Gómez-Pastor R, Pérez-Torrado R, Cabiscol E, Matallana E.

FEMS Yeast Res. 2010 Nov;10(7):870-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2010.00667.x. Epub 2010 Aug 25.

17.

The response of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to sudden vs. gradual changes in environmental stress monitored by expression of the stress response protein Hsp12p.

Nisamedtinov I, Lindsey GG, Karreman R, Orumets K, Koplimaa M, Kevvai K, Paalme T.

FEMS Yeast Res. 2008 Sep;8(6):829-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00391.x. Epub 2008 Jul 8.

18.

Quantitative analysis of wine yeast gene expression profiles under winemaking conditions.

Varela C, Cárdenas J, Melo F, Agosin E.

Yeast. 2005 Apr 15;22(5):369-83.

19.

Reduction of oxidative cellular damage by overexpression of the thioredoxin TRX2 gene improves yield and quality of wine yeast dry active biomass.

Gómez-Pastor R, Pérez-Torrado R, Cabiscol E, Ros J, Matallana E.

Microb Cell Fact. 2010 Feb 12;9:9. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-9-9. Erratum in: Microb Cell Fact. 2012;11:31.

20.

Analyses of stress resistance under laboratory conditions constitute a suitable criterion for wine yeast selection.

Zuzuarregui A, del Olmo M.

Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2004 May;85(4):271-80.

PMID:
15028866

Supplemental Content

Support Center