Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 118

1.

Personal computer versus workstation display: observer performance in detection of wrist fractures on digital radiographs.

Doyle AJ, Le Fevre J, Anderson GD.

Radiology. 2005 Dec;237(3):872-7. Epub 2005 Oct 19.

PMID:
16237135
3.

Can paper replace laser film to communicate the results of wrist radiographs in trauma cases? A reproducibility study of the reading of wrist trauma case radiographs on a PACS workstation, laser film, and paper.

Teixeira P, Zabel JP, Baumann C, Albizzati S, Coudane H, Winninger D, Blum A.

J Digit Imaging. 2013 Dec;26(6):1013-9. doi: 10.1007/s10278-013-9613-8.

4.

Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of tomosynthesis in fractures of the wrist.

Ottenin MA, Jacquot A, Grospretre O, Noël A, Lecocq S, Louis M, Blum A.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Jan;198(1):180-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.6374.

PMID:
22194495
6.

Comparison of full-field digital mammography workstation and conventional picture archiving and communication system in image quality and diagnostic performance.

Kang BJ, Kim SH, Choi BG.

Clin Imaging. 2011 Sep-Oct;35(5):336-40. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.10.005.

PMID:
21872121
7.
8.

Evaluation of low-cost computer monitors for the detection of cervical spine injuries in the emergency room: an observer confidence-based study.

Brem MH, Böhner C, Brenning A, Gelse K, Radkow T, Blanke M, Schlechtweg PM, Neumann G, Wu IY, Bautz W, Hennig FF, Richter H.

Emerg Med J. 2006 Nov;23(11):850-3.

9.

Evaluation of a digital workstation for interpreting neonatal examinations. A receiver operating characteristic study.

Franken EA Jr, Berbaum KS, Marley SM, Smith WL, Sato Y, Kao SC, Milam SG.

Invest Radiol. 1992 Sep;27(9):732-7.

PMID:
1399457
10.

Digital luminescence radiography using a chest phantom. Comparison between radiographs displayed on monitor at a workstation and at a personal.

Lyttkens K, Kehler M, Andersson B, Carlsen S, Ebbesen A, Hochbergs P, Strömbäck A.

Acta Radiol. 1993 Sep;34(5):440-4.

PMID:
8369178
11.

Diagnostic efficacy of handheld devices for emergency radiologic consultation.

Toomey RJ, Ryan JT, McEntee MF, Evanoff MG, Chakraborty DP, McNulty JP, Manning DJ, Thomas EM, Brennan PC.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Feb;194(2):469-74. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3418.

12.

Storage phosphor radiography of wrist fractures: a subjective comparison of image quality at varying exposure levels.

Peer R, Lanser A, Giacomuzzi SM, Pechlaner S, Künzel H, Bodner G, Gaber O, Jaschke W, Peer S.

Eur Radiol. 2002 Jun;12(6):1354-9. Epub 2002 Feb 21.

PMID:
12042939
13.
14.

ROC analysis for diagnostic accuracy of fracture by using different monitors.

Liang Z, Li K, Yang X, Du X, Liu J, Zhao X, Qi X.

J Digit Imaging. 2006 Sep;19(3):276-8.

15.

Interpretation of digital breast tomosynthesis: preliminary study on comparison with picture archiving and communication system (PACS) and dedicated workstation.

Kim YS, Chang JM, Yi A, Shin SU, Lee ME, Kim WH, Cho N, Moon WK.

Br J Radiol. 2017 Aug;90(1077):20170182. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170182. Epub 2017 Jul 14.

PMID:
28707529
16.

Direct digital radiography versus storage phosphor radiography in the detection of wrist fractures.

Peer S, Neitzel U, Giacomuzzi SM, Pechlaner S, Künzel KH, Peer R, Gassner E, Steingruber I, Gaber O, Jaschke W.

Clin Radiol. 2002 Apr;57(4):258-62.

PMID:
12014869
17.
18.
19.

The effect of lossy discrete cosine transform compression on subtle bone fractures.

Toney MO, Dominguez R, Dao HN, Simmons G.

J Digit Imaging. 1997 Nov;10(4):169-73.

20.

Improved wrist fracture localization with digital overlay of bone scintigrams and radiographs.

Roolker W, Tiel-van Buul MM, Broekhuizen AH, Eikelenboom AK, van Royen EA.

J Nucl Med. 1997 Oct;38(10):1600-3.

Supplemental Content

Support Center