Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 154

1.
2.
3.

The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks.

Austin PC.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jun;61(6):537-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.07.011. Epub 2008 Feb 14.

PMID:
18471657
4.
5.

Preoperative statin therapy is associated with reduced cardiac mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Collard CD, Body SC, Shernan SK, Wang S, Mangano DT; Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia (MCSPI) Research Group, Inc.; Ischemia Research and Education Foundation (IREF) Investigators..

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Aug;132(2):392-400.

6.
8.

Systematic differences in treatment effect estimates between propensity score methods and logistic regression.

Martens EP, Pestman WR, de Boer A, Belitser SV, Klungel OH.

Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;37(5):1142-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn079. Epub 2008 May 3.

PMID:
18453634
9.

The relative ability of different propensity score methods to balance measured covariates between treated and untreated subjects in observational studies.

Austin PC.

Med Decis Making. 2009 Nov-Dec;29(6):661-77. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09341755. Epub 2009 Aug 14.

PMID:
19684288
10.
11.
12.

The concept of the marginally matched subject in propensity-score matched analyses.

Austin PC, Lee DS.

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009 Jun;18(6):469-82. doi: 10.1002/pds.1733.

PMID:
19319923
13.

An application of propensity score matching using claims data.

Seeger JD, Williams PL, Walker AM.

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 Jul;14(7):465-76.

PMID:
15651087
14.

Use of propensity score technique to account for exposure-related covariates: an example and lesson.

Seeger JD, Kurth T, Walker AM.

Med Care. 2007 Oct;45(10 Supl 2):S143-8.

PMID:
17909373
15.
16.

[Analysis with the propensity score of the association between likelihood of treatment and event of interest in observational studies. An example with myocardial reperfusion].

Martí H, Pérez-Bárcena J, Fiol M, Marrugat J, Navarro C, Aldasoro E, Cabadés A, Segura A, Masiá R, Turumbay J, Cirera L, Arteagoitia JM, Tomás CA, Vega G, Sala J, de Los Arcos E, Tormo MJ, Hurtado-de-Saracho I, Francés-Sempere M, Elosua R; Investigadores del estudio IBERICA..

Rev Esp Cardiol. 2005 Feb;58(2):126-36. Spanish.

17.

The use of the propensity score for estimating treatment effects: administrative versus clinical data.

Austin PC, Mamdani MM, Stukel TA, Anderson GM, Tu JV.

Stat Med. 2005 May 30;24(10):1563-78.

PMID:
15706581
18.

Assessing balance in measured baseline covariates when using many-to-one matching on the propensity-score.

Austin PC.

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Dec;17(12):1218-25. doi: 10.1002/pds.1674.

PMID:
18972455
19.

Reanalysis of systematic reviews: the case of invasive strategies for acute coronary syndromes.

Kuukasjärvi P, Nordhausen K, Malmivaara A.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006 Fall;22(4):484-96.

PMID:
16984682
20.

Bayesian propensity score analysis for observational data.

McCandless LC, Gustafson P, Austin PC.

Stat Med. 2009 Jan 15;28(1):94-112. doi: 10.1002/sim.3460.

PMID:
19012268

Supplemental Content

Support Center