Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 429

1.

Optimal collection technique and devices for a quality pap smear.

Marchand L, Mundt M, Klein G, Agarwal SC.

WMJ. 2005 Aug;104(6):51-5.

2.

Current cervical cancer screening practices of Dane County, Wisconsin primary care clinicians.

Marchand L, Van Dinter M, Mundt M, Dingel W, Klein G.

WMJ. 2003;102(3):35-40.

3.

Comparison of cytobrush with Cervex-Brush for endocervical cytologic sampling.

Neinstein LS, Church J, Akiyoshi T.

J Adolesc Health. 1992 Sep;13(6):520-3.

PMID:
1390820
4.

Specimen adequacy and the ThinPrep Pap Test: the endocervical component.

Selvaggi SM, Guidos BJ.

Diagn Cytopathol. 2000 Jul;23(1):23-6.

PMID:
10907927
5.
6.

A continuous quality improvement project to improve the quality of cervical Papanicolaou smears.

Burkman RT, Ward R, Balchandani K, Kini S.

Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Sep;84(3):470-5.

PMID:
8058251
7.

Cost-effectiveness of using the Cervex-Brush (broom) compared to the elongated spatula for collection of conventional cervical cytology samples within a high-burden HIV setting: a model-based analysis.

Schnippel K, Michelow P, Chibwesha CJ, Makura C, Lince-Deroche N, Goeieman B, Mulongo M, Jordaan S, Firnhaber C.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Nov 6;15:499. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1163-y.

8.

European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for collecting samples for conventional and liquid-based cytology.

Arbyn M, Herbert A, Schenck U, Nieminen P, Jordan J, Mcgoogan E, Patnick J, Bergeron C, Baldauf JJ, Klinkhamer P, Bulten J, Martin-Hirsch P.

Cytopathology. 2007 Jun;18(3):133-9.

PMID:
17573762
9.

The quality of the Pap smear.

Fokke HE, Salvatore CM, Schipper ME, Bleker OP.

Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1992;13(5):445-8.

PMID:
1486925
10.

Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples.

Martin-Hirsch P, Jarvis G, Kitchener H, Lilford R.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(3):CD001036. Review.

PMID:
10908482
11.
12.

Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.

Paraiso MF, Brady K, Helmchen R, Roat TW.

Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Oct;84(4):539-43.

PMID:
8090390
13.

Order of endocervical and ectocervical cytologic sampling and the quality of the Papanicolaou smear.

Eisenberger D, Hernandez E, Tener T, Atkinson BF.

Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Nov;90(5):755-8.

PMID:
9351759
14.

Comparative evaluation of seven cell collection devices for cervical smears.

Kohlberger PD, Stani J, Gitsch G, Kieback DG, Breitenecker G.

Acta Cytol. 1999 Nov-Dec;43(6):1023-6. Review.

PMID:
10578973
15.

A comparison between the Accu-Pap device and the extended-tip wooden Ayre spatula for cervical cytology sampling.

Stock RJ, Thurmond AI, Passmore A.

Acta Cytol. 1988 May-Jun;32(3):307-10.

PMID:
3376697
16.
17.

Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears.

Boon ME, de Graaff Guilloud JC, Rietveld WJ.

Acta Cytol. 1989 Nov-Dec;33(6):843-8.

PMID:
2588917
18.

A randomized clinical trial comparing the Cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears.

Koonings PP, Dickinson K, d'Ablaing G 3rd, Schlaerth JB.

Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Aug;80(2):241-5.

PMID:
1635737
19.

The effect of the quality of Papanicolaou smears on the detection of cytologic abnormalities.

Mintzer M, Curtis P, Resnick JC, Morrell D.

Cancer. 1999 Jun 25;87(3):113-7.

PMID:
10385441
20.

A comparative study of two devices used for cervical cell sampling raises some doubts about liquid-based cytology.

Kothari A, Karim SZ, Gordon A, Raslan F, Abdalla M, George S.

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006 Jul-Aug;16(4):1579-86.

PMID:
16884369

Supplemental Content

Support Center