Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 505

1.

Perception of aperiodicity in pathological voice.

Kreiman J, Gerratt BR.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Apr;117(4 Pt 1):2201-11.

PMID:
15898661
2.

Measuring vocal quality with speech synthesis.

Gerratt BR, Kreiman J.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Nov;110(5 Pt 1):2560-6.

3.

Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment.

Kreiman J, Gerratt BR.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Oct;108(4):1867-76.

4.

Quantitative spectral evaluation of shimmer and jitter.

Klingholz F, Martin F.

J Speech Hear Res. 1985 Jun;28(2):169-74.

PMID:
4010246
5.

The vocal clarity of female speech-language pathology students: an exploratory study.

Warhurst S, Madill C, McCabe P, Heard R, Yiu E.

J Voice. 2012 Jan;26(1):63-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.10.008. Epub 2011 Mar 25.

PMID:
21439779
6.

Pathologic voice type and the acoustic prediction of severity.

Martin D, Fitch J, Wolfe V.

J Speech Hear Res. 1995 Aug;38(4):765-71.

PMID:
7474970
7.

Selection and combination of acoustic features for the description of pathologic voices.

Michaelis D, Fröhlich M, Strube HW.

J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Mar;103(3):1628-39.

PMID:
9514027
8.

Acoustic and perceptual measurements of roughness influencing judgments of pitch.

Wolfe VI, Ratusnik DL.

J Speech Hear Disord. 1988 Feb;53(1):15-22.

PMID:
3339863
9.

The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice.

Eadie TL, Baylor CR.

J Voice. 2006 Dec;20(4):527-44. Epub 2005 Dec 1.

PMID:
16324823
10.

When and why listeners disagree in voice quality assessment tasks.

Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Ito M.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Oct;122(4):2354-64.

PMID:
17902870
11.

The effect of visible speech in the perceptual rating of pathological voices.

Martens JW, Versnel H, Dejonckere PH.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Feb;133(2):178-85.

PMID:
17309988
12.

Perception of dysphonic voice quality by naive listeners.

Wolfe VI, Martin DP, Palmer CI.

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000 Jun;43(3):697-705.

PMID:
10877439
13.

Least mean square measures of voice perturbation.

Milenkovic P.

J Speech Hear Res. 1987 Dec;30(4):529-38.

PMID:
2961933
14.

Required number of tokens to determine representative voice perturbation values.

Scherer RC, Vail VJ, Guo CG.

J Speech Hear Res. 1995 Dec;38(6):1260-9.

PMID:
8747819
15.

Development and perceptual assessment of a synthesizer of disordered voices.

Fraj S, Schoentgen J, Grenez F.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Oct;132(4):2603-15. doi: 10.1121/1.4751536.

PMID:
23039453
16.

Laryngeal perturbation analysis: minimum length of analysis window.

Karnell MP.

J Speech Hear Res. 1991 Jun;34(3):544-8.

PMID:
2072678
17.

Perception of synthesized voice quality in connected speech by Cantonese speakers.

Yiu EM, Murdoch B, Hird K, Lau P.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Sep;112(3 Pt 1):1091-101.

PMID:
12243157
18.

[Spectrographic study of voice disorders: subharmonics].

Núñez Batalla F, Suárez Nieto C, Muñoz Pinto C, Baragaño Río L, Alvarez Zapico MJ, Martínez Ferreras A.

Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2000 Jan-Feb;51(1):52-6. Spanish.

PMID:
10799933
19.

Objective measures of breathy voice quality obtained using an auditory model.

Shrivastav R, Sapienza CM.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Oct;114(4 Pt 1):2217-24.

PMID:
14587619
20.

Acoustic correlates of pathologic voice types.

Wolfe V, Cornell R, Palmer C.

J Speech Hear Res. 1991 Jun;34(3):509-16.

PMID:
2072674

Supplemental Content

Support Center