Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 79

1.

BrainMap taxonomy of experimental design: description and evaluation.

Fox PT, Laird AR, Fox SP, Fox PM, Uecker AM, Crank M, Koenig SF, Lancaster JL.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 May;25(1):185-98.

PMID:
15846810
2.

The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.

Delaney A, Bagshaw SM, Ferland A, Laupland K, Manns B, Doig C.

Crit Care Med. 2007 Feb;35(2):589-94.

PMID:
17205029
3.

Meta-analysis of functional imaging data using replicator dynamics.

Neumann J, Lohmann G, Derrfuss J, von Cramon DY.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 May;25(1):165-73.

PMID:
15846812
4.

Automated analysis of meta-analysis networks.

Lancaster JL, Laird AR, Fox PM, Glahn DE, Fox PT.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 May;25(1):174-84.

PMID:
15846809
6.

Quality of reporting of cancer prognostic marker studies: association with reported prognostic effect.

Kyzas PA, Denaxa-Kyza D, Ioannidis JP.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Feb 7;99(3):236-43.

PMID:
17284718
7.

A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature.

Delaney A, Bagshaw SM, Ferland A, Manns B, Laupland KB, Doig CJ.

Crit Care. 2005 Oct 5;9(5):R575-82. Epub 2005 Sep 9. Review.

8.

Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.

Bereza BG, Machado M, Einarson TR.

Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Oct;42(10):1402-9. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L204. Epub 2008 Sep 2.

PMID:
18728102
9.

Modeling of activation data in the BrainMap database: detection of outliers.

Nielsen FA, Hansen LK.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Mar;15(3):146-56.

PMID:
11835605
10.

Indirect comparisons of competing interventions.

Glenny AM, Altman DG, Song F, Sakarovitch C, Deeks JJ, D'Amico R, Bradburn M, Eastwood AJ; International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group.

Health Technol Assess. 2005 Jul;9(26):1-134, iii-iv.

11.

Industry-supported meta-analyses compared with meta-analyses with non-profit or no support: differences in methodological quality and conclusions.

Jørgensen AW, Maric KL, Tendal B, Faurschou A, Gøtzsche PC.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Sep 9;8:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-60.

12.

BrainMap VBM: An environment for structural meta-analysis.

Vanasse TJ, Fox PM, Barron DS, Robertson M, Eickhoff SB, Lancaster JL, Fox PT.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Aug;39(8):3308-3325. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24078. Epub 2018 May 2.

PMID:
29717540
14.

Meta-analysis of quasi-experimental research: are systematic narrative reviews indicated?

Colliver JA, Kucera K, Verhulst SJ.

Med Educ. 2008 Sep;42(9):858-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03144.x.

PMID:
18715482
15.

Meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: a comparison of image-based and coordinate-based pooling of studies.

Salimi-Khorshidi G, Smith SM, Keltner JR, Wager TD, Nichols TE.

Neuroimage. 2009 Apr 15;45(3):810-23. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.039. Epub 2008 Dec 31.

PMID:
19166944
16.

Bibliographic study showed improving methodology of meta-analyses published in leading journals 1993-2002.

Gerber S, Tallon D, Trelle S, Schneider M, Jüni P, Egger M.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Aug;60(8):773-80. Epub 2007 Mar 26. Review.

PMID:
17606172
17.

Development and validation of MIX: comprehensive free software for meta-analysis of causal research data.

Bax L, Yu LM, Ikeda N, Tsuruta H, Moons KG.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Oct 13;6:50.

19.

Coordinate-based voxel-wise meta-analysis: dividends of spatial normalization. Report of a virtual workshop.

Fox PT, Laird AR, Lancaster JL.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 May;25(1):1-5. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
15846826
20.

Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses.

Brok J, Thorlund K, Gluud C, Wetterslev J.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Aug;61(8):763-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.007. Epub 2008 Apr 14.

PMID:
18411040

Supplemental Content

Support Center