Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 333

1.

TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores: sustained prognostic value and interaction with revascularization in NSTE-ACS.

de Araújo Gonçalves P, Ferreira J, Aguiar C, Seabra-Gomes R.

Eur Heart J. 2005 May;26(9):865-72. Epub 2005 Mar 11.

PMID:
15764619
2.

Risk scores for risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes: useful but simpler is not necessarily better.

Yan AT, Yan RT, Tan M, Casanova A, Labinaz M, Sridhar K, Fitchett DH, Langer A, Goodman SG.

Eur Heart J. 2007 May;28(9):1072-8. Epub 2007 Apr 16.

PMID:
17437970
3.

Does continuous ST-segment monitoring add prognostic information to the TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores?

Carmo P, Ferreira J, Aguiar C, Ferreira A, Raposo L, Gonçalves P, Brito J, Silva A.

Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2011 Jul;16(3):239-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2011.00438.x.

PMID:
21762251
4.

[Development and validation of risk score model for acute myocardial infarction in China: prognostic value thereof for in hospital major adverse cardiac events and evaluation of revascularization].

Wu XF, Lü SZ, Chen YD, Pan WQ, Song XT, Li J, Liu X, Wang XZ, Zhang LJ, Ren F, Luo JG; GRACE Investigators..

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Jul 8;88(26):1815-9. Chinese.

PMID:
19040015
5.

Improved in-hospital outcomes in acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina/non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction) despite similar TIMI risk scores.

Almeda FQ, Hendel RC, Nathan S, Meyer PM, Calvin JE, Klein LW.

J Invasive Cardiol. 2003 Sep;15(9):502-6.

PMID:
12947210
6.

Does high-sensitivity C-reactive protein add prognostic value to the TIMI-Risk Score in individuals with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes?

Correia LC, Lima JC, Rocha MS, D'Oliveira Junior A, Péricles Esteves J.

Clin Chim Acta. 2007 Jan;375(1-2):124-8. Epub 2006 Jun 29.

PMID:
16916502
7.

Relationship between circulating endothelial cells and the predicted risk of cardiovascular events in acute coronary syndromes.

Boos CJ, Soor SK, Kang D, Lip GY.

Eur Heart J. 2007 May;28(9):1092-101. Epub 2007 Apr 21.

PMID:
17449878
8.

Clinical trial--derived risk model may not generalize to real-world patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Yan AT, Jong P, Yan RT, Tan M, Fitchett D, Chow CM, Roe MT, Pieper KS, Langer A, Goodman SG; Canadian Acute Coronary Syndromes registry investigators..

Am Heart J. 2004 Dec;148(6):1020-7.

PMID:
15632888
9.

Understanding physicians' risk stratification of acute coronary syndromes: insights from the Canadian ACS 2 Registry.

Yan AT, Yan RT, Huynh T, Casanova A, Raimondo FE, Fitchett DH, Langer A, Goodman SG; Canadian Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry 2 Investigators..

Arch Intern Med. 2009 Feb 23;169(4):372-8. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.563.

PMID:
19237721
10.

Long-term prognostic value and therapeutic implications of continuous ST-segment monitoring in acute coronary syndrome.

Yan AT, Yan RT, Tan M, Senaratne M, Fitchett DH, Langer A, Goodman SG; INTERACT Investigators..

Am Heart J. 2007 Apr;153(4):500-6.

PMID:
17383285
11.

Comparison of the predictive value of four different risk scores for outcomes of patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Lev EI, Kornowski R, Vaknin-Assa H, Porter A, Teplitsky I, Ben-Dor I, Brosh D, Fuchs S, Battler A, Assali A.

Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jul 1;102(1):6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.02.088. Epub 2008 May 28.

PMID:
18572028
12.

Risk prediction in patients presenting with suspected cardiac pain: the GRACE and TIMI risk scores versus clinical evaluation.

Ramsay G, Podogrodzka M, McClure C, Fox KA.

QJM. 2007 Jan;100(1):11-8. Epub 2006 Dec 15.

PMID:
17175559
13.

Diverging associations of an intended early invasive strategy compared with actual revascularization, and outcome in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the problem of treatment selection bias.

Hirsch A, Windhausen F, Tijssen JG, Oude Ophuis AJ, van der Giessen WJ, van der Zee PM, Cornel JH, Verheugt FW, de Winter RJ; Invasive versus Conservative Treatment in Unstable coronary Syndromes Investigators..

Eur Heart J. 2009 Mar;30(6):645-54. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn438. Epub 2008 Sep 29.

PMID:
18824461
14.
15.

Modified thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk score to risk stratify patients in the emergency department with possible acute coronary syndrome.

Jaffery Z, Hudson MP, Jacobsen G, Nowak R, McCord J.

J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2007 Oct;24(2):137-44. Epub 2007 Feb 21.

PMID:
17318424
16.

Comparison of cardiac risk scores in ED patients with potential acute coronary syndrome.

Lee B, Chang AM, Matsuura AC, Marcoon S, Hollander JE.

Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2011 Jun;10(2):64-8. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e31821c79bd.

PMID:
21988945
17.

Comparison of the prognostic predictive value of the TIMI, PAMI, CADILLAC, and GRACE risk scores in STEACS undergoing primary or rescue PCI.

Méndez-Eirín E, Flores-Ríos X, García-López F, Pérez-Pérez AJ, Estévez-Loureiro R, Piñón-Esteban P, Aldama-López G, Salgado-Fernández J, Calviño-Santos RA, Vázquez Rodríguez JM, Vázquez-González N, Castro-Beiras A.

Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2012 Mar;65(3):227-33. doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2011.10.019. Epub 2012 Jan 26. English, Spanish.

PMID:
22281285
18.

Prognostic value of serum biomarkers in association with TIMI risk score for acute coronary syndromes.

Manenti ER, Bodanese LC, Camey SA, Polanczyk CA.

Clin Cardiol. 2006 Sep;29(9):405-10.

19.
20.

ST-segment depression in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: quantitative analysis may not provide incremental prognostic value beyond comprehensive risk stratification.

Yan AT, Yan RT, Tan M, Chow CM, Fitchett DH, Georgescu AA, Hassan Q, Luchansky J, Langer A, Goodman SG; Canadian ACS Registry Investigators..

Am Heart J. 2006 Aug;152(2):270-6.

PMID:
16875907

Supplemental Content

Support Center