Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 271

1.

Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Metz S, Damoser P, Hollweck R, Roggel R, Engelke C, Woertler K, Renger B, Rummeny EJ, Link TM.

Radiology. 2005 Mar;234(3):776-84.

PMID:
15734933
2.

Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.

Hamer OW, Sirlin CB, Strotzer M, Borisch I, Zorger N, Feuerbach S, Völk M.

Radiology. 2005 Nov;237(2):691-700.

PMID:
16192324
3.

Radiation dose reduction in chest radiography using a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector.

Hosch WP, Fink C, Radeleff B, kampschulte a A, Kauffmann GW, Hansmann J.

Clin Radiol. 2002 Oct;57(10):902-7.

PMID:
12413914
4.

Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems.

Bacher K, Smeets P, Vereecken L, De Hauwere A, Duyck P, De Man R, Verstraete K, Thierens H.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Sep;187(3):630-7.

PMID:
16928923
5.

Experimental evaluation of a portable indirect flat-panel detector for the pediatric chest: comparison with storage phosphor radiography at different exposures by using a chest phantom.

Rapp-Bernhardt U, Bernhardt TM, Lenzen H, Esseling R, Roehl FW, Schiborr M, Theobald-Hormann I, Heindel W.

Radiology. 2005 Nov;237(2):485-91.

PMID:
16170012
6.
7.
8.

Contrast-detail phantom study for x-ray spectrum optimization regarding chest radiography using a cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.

Hamer OW, Völk M, Zorger N, Borisch I, Büttner R, Feuerbach S, Strotzer M.

Invest Radiol. 2004 Oct;39(10):610-8.

PMID:
15377940
9.

Flat-panel x-ray detector using amorphous silicon technology. Reduced radiation dose for the detection of foreign bodies.

Völk M, Strotzer M, Gmeinwieser J, Alexander J, Fründ R, Seitz J, Manke C, Spahn M, Feuerbach S.

Invest Radiol. 1997 Jul;32(7):373-7.

PMID:
9228601
10.

Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction.

Strotzer M, Völk M, Fründ R, Hamer O, Zorger N, Feuerbach S.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Jan;178(1):169-71.

PMID:
11756114
12.

Detectability of simulated pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: comparison between irradiation side sampling indirect flat-panel detector and computed radiography.

Yano Y, Yabuuchi H, Tanaka N, Morishita J, Akasaka T, Matsuo Y, Sunami S, Kamitani T, Jinnouchi M, Yamasaki Y, Nagao M, Sasaki M.

Eur J Radiol. 2013 Nov;82(11):2050-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.05.036.

PMID:
23827799
13.

Diagnostic performance of a flat-panel detector at low tube voltage in chest radiography: a phantom study.

Bernhardt TM, Rapp-Bernhardt U, Lenzen H, Röhl FW, Diederich S, Papke K, Ludwig K, Heindel W.

Invest Radiol. 2004 Feb;39(2):97-103.

PMID:
14734924
14.

Flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon versus asymmetric screen-film system: phantom study of dose reduction and depiction of simulated findings.

Rapp-Bernhardt U, Roehl FW, Gibbs RC, Schmidl H, Krause UW, Bernhardt TM.

Radiology. 2003 May;227(2):484-92.

PMID:
12676965
15.

[Chest radiography: ROC phantom study of four different digital systems and one conventional radiographic system].

Redlich U, Reissberg S, Hoeschen C, Effenberger O, Fessel A, Preuss H, Scherlach C, Döhring W.

Rofo. 2003 Jan;175(1):38-45. German.

PMID:
12525979
16.

Chest radiography with a large-area detector based on cesium-iodide/amorphous-silicon technology: image quality and dose requirement in comparison with an asymmetric screen-film system.

Strotzer M, Völk M, Reiser M, Lenhart M, Manke C, Gmeinwieser J, Holzknecht N, Link J, Feuerbach S.

J Thorac Imaging. 2000 Jul;15(3):157-61.

PMID:
10928606
17.

Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study.

Garmer M, Hennigs SP, Jäger HJ, Schrick F, van de Loo T, Jacobs A, Hanusch A, Christmann A, Mathias K.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Jan;174(1):75-80.

PMID:
10628458
18.
19.

Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions.

Schaefer-Prokop CM, Prokop M, Schmidt A, Neitzel U, Galanski M.

Radiology. 1996 Oct;201(1):45-50.

PMID:
8816519
20.

Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus screen-film radiography: effect of dose reduction on the detectability of cortical bone defects and fractures.

Strotzer M, Gmeinwieser J, Spahn M, Völk M, Fründ R, Seitz J, Spies V, Alexander J, Feuerbach S.

Invest Radiol. 1998 Jan;33(1):33-8.

PMID:
9438507
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center