Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 208

1.

Male mate choice influences female promiscuity in Soay sheep.

Preston BT, Stevenson IR, Pemberton JM, Coltman DW, Wilson K.

Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 22;272(1561):365-73.

2.

Soay rams target reproductive activity towards promiscuous females' optimal insemination period.

Preston BT, Stevenson IR, Wilson K.

Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Oct 7;270(1528):2073-8.

3.

Overt and covert competition in a promiscuous mammal: the importance of weaponry and testes size to male reproductive success.

Preston BT, Stevenson IR, Pemberton JM, Coltman DW, Wilson K.

Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 22;270(1515):633-40.

4.

An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.

Fedina TY, Lewis SM.

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008 May;83(2):151-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00037.x. Review.

PMID:
18429767
5.

The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.

Bonduriansky R.

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2001 Aug;76(3):305-39. Review.

PMID:
11569787
7.

Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits.

Jennions MD, Petrie M.

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000 Feb;75(1):21-64. Review.

PMID:
10740892
8.

Polyandry as a mediator of sexual selection before and after mating.

Kvarnemo C, Simmons LW.

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 21;368(1613):20120042. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0042. Print 2013 Mar 5. Review.

9.

Male reproductive success in a promiscuous mammal: behavioural estimates compared with genetic paternity.

Coltman DW, Bancroft DR, Robertson A, Smith JA, Clutton-Brock TH, Pemberton JM.

Mol Ecol. 1999 Jul;8(7):1199-209.

PMID:
10447860
10.

Males' evolutionary responses to experimental removal of sexual selection.

Pitnick S, Miller GT, Reagan J, Holland B.

Proc Biol Sci. 2001 May 22;268(1471):1071-80.

11.

Meiotic drive changes sperm precedence patterns in house mice: potential for male alternative mating tactics?

Sutter A, Lindholm AK.

BMC Evol Biol. 2016 Jun 21;16(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12862-016-0710-4.

12.

Live fast, die young: trade-offs between fitness components and sexually antagonistic selection on weaponry in Soay sheep.

Robinson MR, Pilkington JG, Clutton-Brock TH, Pemberton JM, Kruuk LE.

Evolution. 2006 Oct;60(10):2168-81.

PMID:
17133873
13.

Size breeds success: multiple paternity, multivariate selection and male semelparity in a small marsupial, Antechinus stuartii.

Holleley CE, Dickman CR, Crowther MS, Oldroyd BP.

Mol Ecol. 2006 Oct;15(11):3439-48.

PMID:
16968281
14.

Post-copulatory sexual selection and female fitness in Scathophaga stercoraria.

Martin OY, Hosken DJ, Ward PI.

Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Feb 22;271(1537):353-9.

15.

Female competition and its evolutionary consequences in mammals.

Stockley P, Bro-Jørgensen J.

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011 May;86(2):341-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00149.x. Review.

PMID:
20636474
16.

Polyandrous females benefit by producing sons that achieve high reproductive success in a competitive environment.

Firman RC.

Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Sep 22;278(1719):2823-31. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2791. Epub 2011 Feb 2.

17.
18.

The Opportunity for Post-Copulatory Sexual Selection in the Ectoparasitic Pea Crab, Dissodactylus primitivus (Brachyura: Pinnotheridae).

Prather RB Jr, Shuster SM.

PLoS One. 2015 Dec 23;10(12):e0145681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145681. eCollection 2015.

19.

Selection on female remating interval is influenced by male sperm competition strategies and ejaculate characteristics.

Alonzo SH, Pizzari T.

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 21;368(1613):20120044. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0044. Print 2013 Mar 5. Review.

20.

Temporal variation in size-assortative mating and male mate choice in a spider with amphisexual care.

Moura RR, Gonzaga MO.

Naturwissenschaften. 2017 Apr;104(3-4):28. doi: 10.1007/s00114-017-1448-6. Epub 2017 Mar 13.

PMID:
28289773

Supplemental Content

Support Center