Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 132

1.

Proximal humeral anatomy in shoulder arthroplasty: Implications for prosthetic design and surgical technique.

Pearl ML.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 Jan-Feb;14(1 Suppl S):99S-104S. Review.

PMID:
15726095
2.

Geometric variables in anatomic replacement of the proximal humerus: how much prosthetic geometry is necessary?

Pearl ML, Kurutz S, Postacchini R.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 May-Jun;18(3):366-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.01.011. Erratum in: J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Dec;21(12):1803. Postachini, Roberto [corrected to Postacchini, Roberto].

PMID:
19297203
3.

Effect of a variable prosthetic neck-shaft angle and the surgical technique on replication of normal humeral anatomy.

Jeong J, Bryan J, Iannotti JP.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Aug;91(8):1932-41. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00729.

PMID:
19651952
4.

Geometric analysis of commonly used prosthetic systems for proximal humeral replacement.

Pearl ML, Kurutz S.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 May;81(5):660-71.

PMID:
10360694
5.

[Current status and perspectives of shoulder replacement].

Habermeyer P, Ebert T.

Unfallchirurg. 1999 Sep;102(9):668-83. Review. German.

PMID:
10506358
6.

Humeral head arthroplasty and its ability to restore original humeral head geometry.

Harrold F, Wigderowitz C.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Jan;22(1):115-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.01.027.

PMID:
22591623
7.

Geometric analysis of selected press fit prosthetic systems for proximal humeral replacement.

Pearl ML, Kurutz S, Robertson DD, Yamaguchi K.

J Orthop Res. 2002 Mar;20(2):192-7.

8.

Variation in neck-shaft angle: influence in prosthetic design.

Iannotti JP, Lippitt SB, Williams GR Jr.

Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2007 Dec;36(12 Suppl 1):9-14. Review.

PMID:
18264551
9.

[Three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus and rotator cuff attachment and its utilization in shoulder arthroplasty].

Hromádka R, Pokorný D, Popelka S, Jahoda D, Sosna A.

Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2006 Apr;73(2):77-84. Czech.

PMID:
16735003
10.

Coronal plane geometry of the proximal humerus relevant to prosthetic arthroplasty.

Pearl ML, Volk AG.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996 Jul-Aug;5(4):320-6.

PMID:
8872931
11.

Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal part of the humerus: relevance to arthroplasty.

Robertson DD, Yuan J, Bigliani LU, Flatow EL, Yamaguchi K.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Nov;82-A(11):1594-602.

PMID:
11097450
12.

Assessment of the Anatomic Neck as an Accurate Landmark for Humeral Head Resurfacing Implant Height Placement.

Chen EJ, Simovitch R, Savoie F, Noel CR.

Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2015 Dec;73 Suppl 1:S28-32.

PMID:
26631192
13.

Shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of the sequelae of fractures of the proximal humerus.

Boileau P, Trojani C, Walch G, Krishnan SG, Romeo A, Sinnerton R.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001 Jul-Aug;10(4):299-308.

PMID:
11517358
14.

The effect of articular malposition after total shoulder arthroplasty on glenohumeral translations, range of motion, and subacromial impingement.

Williams GR Jr, Wong KL, Pepe MD, Tan V, Silverberg D, Ramsey ML, Karduna A, Iannotti JP.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001 Sep-Oct;10(5):399-409.

PMID:
11641695
15.

Influence of component positioning on impingement in conventional total shoulder arthroplasty.

Favre P, Moor B, Snedeker JG, Gerber C.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008 Feb;23(2):175-83.

PMID:
17983693
16.

Influence of glenoid component design and humeral component retroversion on internal and external rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaver study.

Berhouet J, Garaud P, Favard L.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Dec;99(8):887-94. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.08.008.

17.

A novel osteotomy in shoulder joint replacement based on analysis of the cartilage/metaphyseal interface.

Harrold F, Malhas A, Wigderowitz C.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2014 Nov;29(9):1032-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.08.008.

PMID:
25195075
18.

[Imaging evaluation on adaptability of proximal humeral anatomy after shoulder replacement with individualized shoulder prosthesis].

Shi Y, Tang K, Yuan C, Tao X, Wang H, Chen B, Guo Y.

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Mar 24;95(11):827-31. Chinese.

PMID:
26080914
19.

Resurfacing humeral prosthesis: do we really reconstruct the anatomy?

Mansat P, Coutié AS, Bonnevialle N, Rongières M, Mansat M, Bonnevialle P.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 May;22(5):612-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.014.

PMID:
23149276
20.

Differences in reconstruction of the anatomy with modern adjustable compared to second-generation shoulder prosthesis.

Irlenbusch U, End S, Kilic M.

Int Orthop. 2011 May;35(5):705-11. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1084-7.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center