Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 136

1.

Touch responses made to remembered and visual target locations in the dark: a human psychophysical study.

Burke MR, Grieve KL.

Exp Brain Res. 2005 Jan;160(4):460-6. Epub 2004 Oct 22.

PMID:
15502990
2.

Allocentric cues do not always improve whole body reaching performance.

Hondzinski JM, Cui Y.

Exp Brain Res. 2006 Sep;174(1):60-73. Epub 2006 Mar 25.

PMID:
16565811
3.

Viewer-centered frame of reference for pointing to memorized targets in three-dimensional space.

McIntyre J, Stratta F, Lacquaniti F.

J Neurophysiol. 1997 Sep;78(3):1601-18. Erratum in: J Neurophysiol 1998 Mar;79(3):preceding 1135. J Neurophysiol 1998 Jun;79(6):3301.

4.

The interaction of visual and proprioceptive inputs in pointing to actual and remembered targets in Parkinson's disease.

Adamovich SV, Berkinblit MB, Hening W, Sage J, Poizner H.

Neuroscience. 2001;104(4):1027-41.

PMID:
11457588
5.

Systematic errors of planar arm movements provide evidence for space categorization effects and interaction of multiple frames of reference.

Gourtzelidis P, Smyrnis N, Evdokimidis I, Balogh A.

Exp Brain Res. 2001 Jul;139(1):59-69.

PMID:
11482844
6.
7.

Humans use visual and remembered information about object location to plan pointing movements.

Brouwer AM, Knill DC.

J Vis. 2009 Jan 21;9(1):24.1-19. doi: 10.1167/9.1.24.

8.

Eye and hand movements during reconstruction of spatial memory.

Burke MR, Allen RJ, Gonzalez C.

Perception. 2012;41(7):803-18.

PMID:
23155732
9.
10.

Visual motion due to eye movements helps guide the hand.

Whitney D, Goodale MA.

Exp Brain Res. 2005 Apr;162(3):394-400. Epub 2005 Jan 15.

11.

The brain uses efference copy information to optimise spatial memory.

Gonzalez CC, Burke MR.

Exp Brain Res. 2013 Jan;224(2):189-97. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3298-y. Epub 2012 Oct 17.

PMID:
23073714
12.

Updating visual memory across eye movements for ocular and arm motor control.

Thompson AA, Henriques DY.

J Neurophysiol. 2008 Nov;100(5):2507-14. doi: 10.1152/jn.90599.2008. Epub 2008 Sep 3.

13.

Differential effects of non-informative vision and visual interference on haptic spatial processing.

Volcic R, van Rheede JJ, Postma A, Kappers AM.

Exp Brain Res. 2008 Sep;190(1):31-41. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1447-0. Epub 2008 Jun 14.

14.

Contribution of reference frames for movement planning in peripersonal space representation.

Ghafouri M, Lestienne FG.

Exp Brain Res. 2006 Feb;169(1):24-36. Epub 2005 Oct 28.

PMID:
16261340
15.

Motion parallax is computed in the updating of human spatial memory.

Medendorp WP, Tweed DB, Crawford JD.

J Neurosci. 2003 Sep 3;23(22):8135-42.

16.

Multiple frames of reference for pointing to a remembered target.

Lemay M, Stelmach GE.

Exp Brain Res. 2005 Jul;164(3):301-10. Epub 2005 Mar 22.

PMID:
15782349
17.

Common mechanisms of spatial attention in memory and perception: a tactile dual-task study.

Katus T, Andersen SK, Müller MM.

Cereb Cortex. 2014 Mar;24(3):707-18. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs350. Epub 2012 Nov 21.

PMID:
23172773
18.

Contribution of tactile information to accuracy in pointing movements.

Rao AK, Gordon AM.

Exp Brain Res. 2001 Jun;138(4):438-45.

PMID:
11465741
19.

Influence of visual constraints in the trajectory formation of grasping movements.

Palluel-Germain R, Boy F, Orliaguet JP, Coello Y.

Neurosci Lett. 2006 Jun 19;401(1-2):97-102. Epub 2006 Mar 23.

PMID:
16556486
20.

Reduced fields of view are neither necessary nor sufficient for distance underestimation but reduce precision and may cause calibration problems.

Loftus A, Murphy S, McKenna I, Mon-Williams M.

Exp Brain Res. 2004 Oct;158(3):328-35. Epub 2004 Jun 10.

PMID:
15197525

Supplemental Content

Support Center