Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 118

1.

A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools.

Katrak P, Bialocerkowski AE, Massy-Westropp N, Kumar S, Grimmer KA.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004 Sep 16;4:22. Review.

2.

Comparison of tools for assessing the methodological quality of primary and secondary studies in health technology assessment reports in Germany.

Dreier M, Borutta B, Stahmeyer J, Krauth C, Walter U.

GMS Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jun 14;6:Doc07. doi: 10.3205/hta000085.

3.

The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.

Zeng X, Zhang Y, Kwong JS, Zhang C, Li S, Sun F, Niu Y, Du L.

J Evid Based Med. 2015 Feb;8(1):2-10. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12141. Review.

4.

Clinical instruments: reliability and validity critical appraisal.

Brink Y, Louw QA.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Dec;18(6):1126-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01707.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.

PMID:
21689217
5.
6.

A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposed.

Crowe M, Sheppard L.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Jan;64(1):79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.008. Epub 2010 Jun 18. Review.

PMID:
21130354
7.

The development and validation of a meta-tool for quality appraisal of public health evidence: Meta Quality Appraisal Tool (MetaQAT).

Rosella L, Bowman C, Pach B, Morgan S, Fitzpatrick T, Goel V.

Public Health. 2016 Jul;136:57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.10.027. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

8.

The development of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL).

Lucas NP, Macaskill P, Irwig L, Bogduk N.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;63(8):854-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.10.002. Epub 2010 Jan 13.

PMID:
20056381
9.

Quality appraisal in systematic reviews of public health interventions: an empirical study on the impact of choice of tool on meta-analysis.

Voss PH, Rehfuess EA.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Jan;67(1):98-104. doi: 10.1136/jech-2011-200940. Epub 2012 Jul 31.

PMID:
22851579
10.
11.

Development of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS): a tool for critical appraisal of quality improvement intervention publications.

Hempel S, Shekelle PG, Liu JL, Sherwood Danz M, Foy R, Lim YW, Motala A, Rubenstein LV.

BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Dec;24(12):796-804. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003151. Epub 2015 Aug 26.

12.

Impact of choice of quality appraisal tool for systematic reviews in overviews.

Pieper D, Mathes T, Eikermann M.

J Evid Based Med. 2014 May;7(2):72-8. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12097.

PMID:
25155764
13.

Comparison of the effects of using the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool versus informal appraisal in assessing health research: a randomised trial.

Crowe M, Sheppard L, Campbell A.

Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011 Dec;9(4):444-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00237.x.

PMID:
22093394
14.

Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations.

Gomersall JS, Jadotte YT, Xue Y, Lockwood S, Riddle D, Preda A.

Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):170-8. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000063.

PMID:
26288063
15.

The use of the Visual Analogue Scale for the assessment of labour pain: a systematic review.

Wei CK, Leng CY, Siew Lin SK.

JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2010;8(24):972-1015.

PMID:
27820205
16.

Measuring the youth bullying experience: a systematic review of the psychometric properties of available instruments.

Vessey J, Strout TD, DiFazio RL, Walker A.

J Sch Health. 2014 Dec;84(12):819-43. doi: 10.1111/josh.12210. Review.

PMID:
25388599
17.

A systematic review of appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines: multiple similarities and one common deficit.

Vlayen J, Aertgeerts B, Hannes K, Sermeus W, Ramaekers D.

Int J Qual Health Care. 2005 Jun;17(3):235-42. Epub 2005 Mar 2. Review.

PMID:
15743883
18.

Development and evaluation of an instrument for the critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials of natural products.

Jurgens T, Whelan AM, MacDonald M, Lord L.

BMC Complement Altern Med. 2009 Apr 23;9:11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-9-11.

19.

OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, part I: critical appraisal of existing treatment guidelines and systematic review of current research evidence.

Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Brandt KD, Croft P, Doherty M, Dougados M, Hochberg M, Hunter DJ, Kwoh K, Lohmander LS, Tugwell P.

Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007 Sep;15(9):981-1000. Epub 2007 Aug 27. Review.

20.

Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.

Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacoot N, Glanville J.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center