Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 103

1.

Impact of the new Bethesda System 2001 on specimen adequacy of conventional cervicovaginal smears.

Fidda N, Miron J, Rodgers WH, Rader A.

Diagn Cytopathol. 2004 Apr;30(4):235-9.

PMID:
15048956
2.

Clinical significance of unsatisfactory conventional pap smears owing to inadequate squamous cellularity defined by the Bethesda 2001 criterion.

Adams AL, Gidley J, Roberson J, Wang W, Eltoum I, Chhieng DC.

Am J Clin Pathol. 2005 May;123(5):738-43.

PMID:
15981813
3.

ASC:SIL ratio following implementation of the 2001 Bethesda System.

Quddus MR, Sung CJ, Eklund CM, Reilly ME, Steinhoff MM.

Diagn Cytopathol. 2004 Apr;30(4):240-2.

PMID:
15048957
5.

Interobserver variability in assessing adequacy of the squamous component in conventional cervicovaginal smears.

Sheffield MV, Simsir A, Talley L, Roberson AJ, Elgert PA, Chhieng DC.

Am J Clin Pathol. 2003 Mar;119(3):367-73.

PMID:
12645338
7.

Atypical squamous cells and low squamous intraepithelial lesions in postmenopausal women: implications for management.

Piccoli R, Mandato VD, Lavitola G, Acunzo G, Bifulco G, Tommaselli GA, Attianese W, Nappi C.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Oct;140(2):269-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.05.007. Epub 2008 Jul 7.

PMID:
18603346
8.

Cervical smear adequacy: cellularity references were found to increase both interobserver agreement and unsatisfactory rate.

Moore D, Pugh-Cain D, Walker T.

Cytopathology. 2009 Jun;20(3):161-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2008.00605.x. Epub 2008 Aug 18.

PMID:
18713249
9.

Evaluation of p16INK4a in cervical lesion of premenopausal and postmenopausal women.

Bolanca IK, Ciglar S.

Coll Antropol. 2007 Apr;31 Suppl 2:107-11.

PMID:
17600938
10.

Assessment of cervicovaginal smear adequacy. The Bethesda System guidelines and reproducibility.

Spires SE, Banks ER, Weeks JA, Banks HW, Davey DD.

Am J Clin Pathol. 1994 Sep;102(3):354-9.

PMID:
8085560
11.

The Bethesda System. Impact on reporting cervicovaginal specimens and reproducibility of criteria for assessing endocervical sampling.

Sherman ME, Weinstein M, Sughayer M, Cappellari JO, Orr JE, Erozan YS, Schiffman MH, Kurman RJ.

Acta Cytol. 1993 Jan-Feb;37(1):55-60.

PMID:
8434497
12.

Atypical squamous cells: improvement in cytohistological correlation by the 2001 Bethesda System.

Karateke A, Gurbuz A, Kabaca C, Zati A, Mengulluoglu M, Kir G.

Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2004;25(5):615-8.

PMID:
15493179
14.

Applicability of the Bethesda System 2001 to a public health setting.

Prandi S, Beccati D, De Aloysio G, Fulgenzi P, Gabrielli M, Ghirardini C, Rivasi F, Saragoni L, de Bianchi PS, Bucchi L.

Cancer. 2006 Oct 25;108(5):271-6.

16.
17.

[Causes and frequency of unsatisfactory cervicovaginal smears].

Gavranović L, Novak SR, Bolanca IK.

Acta Med Croatica. 2011 Sep;65 Suppl 1:115-9. Croatian.

PMID:
23126038
18.

Clinical results of a split sample liquid-based cytology (ThinPrep) study of 4,322 patients in a Turkish institution.

Tuncer ZS, Başaran M, Sezgin Y, Firat P, Mocan Kuzey G.

Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2005;26(6):646-8.

PMID:
16398228
19.

Efficacy assessment of CellSlide in liquid-based gynecologic cytology.

Chung JH, Park EJ, Choi YD, Kim HS, Lee YJ, Ko HM, Kim KS, Nam JH, Park CS.

Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Dec;99(3):597-602. Epub 2005 Aug 30.

PMID:
16137748
20.

The utility of p16INK4a and Ki-67 staining on cell blocks prepared from residual thin-layer cervicovaginal material.

Akpolat I, Smith DA, Ramzy I, Chirala M, Mody DR.

Cancer. 2004 Jun 25;102(3):142-9.

Supplemental Content

Support Center