Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 839

1.

Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities.

Kerlikowske K, Smith-Bindman R, Ljung BM, Grady D.

Ann Intern Med. 2003 Aug 19;139(4):274-84. Review.

PMID:
12965983
2.

Interventional breast procedures.

de Paredes ES, Langer TG, Cousins J.

Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 1998 Sep-Oct;27(5):133-84. Review.

PMID:
9794095
3.

Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted?

Graf O, Helbich TH, Fuchsjaeger MH, Hopf G, Morgun M, Graf C, Mallek R, Sickles EA.

Radiology. 2004 Dec;233(3):850-6. Epub 2004 Oct 14.

PMID:
15486217
4.

Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study.

Fajardo LL, Pisano ED, Caudry DJ, Gatsonis CA, Berg WA, Connolly J, Schnitt S, Page DL, McNeil BJ; Radiologist Investigators of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V..

Acad Radiol. 2004 Mar;11(3):293-308.

PMID:
15035520
6.

Fine-needle aspiration of clinically suspicious palpable breast masses with histopathologic correlation.

Ariga R, Bloom K, Reddy VB, Kluskens L, Francescatti D, Dowlat K, Siziopikou P, Gattuso P.

Am J Surg. 2002 Nov;184(5):410-3.

PMID:
12433603
7.

A modified triple test for palpable breast masses: the value of ultrasound and core needle biopsy.

Wai CJ, Al-Mubarak G, Homer MJ, Goldkamp A, Samenfeld-Specht M, Lee Y, Logvinenko T, Rothschild JG, Graham RA.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Mar;20(3):850-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2710-y. Epub 2012 Oct 27.

PMID:
23104707
8.

Solid nonpalpable breast lesions. Success and failure of guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in a consecutive series of 2444 cases.

Ciatto S, Rosselli Del Turco M, Ambrogetti D, Bravetti P, Catarzi S, Morrone D, Cariaggi MP.

Acta Radiol. 1997 Sep;38(5):815-20.

PMID:
9332236
9.

Combined fine-needle aspiration, physical examination and mammography in the diagnosis of palpable breast masses: their relation to outcome for women with primary breast cancer.

Steinberg JL, Trudeau ME, Ryder DE, Fishell E, Chapman JA, McCready DR, Fish EB, Hiraki GY, Ross TM, Lickley LA.

Can J Surg. 1996 Aug;39(4):302-11. Erratum in: Can J Surg 1997 Feb;40(1):9.

10.

Breast fine needle aspiration cytology. Utility as a screening tool for clinically palpable lesions.

Costa MJ, Tadros T, Hilton G, Birdsong G.

Acta Cytol. 1993 Jul-Aug;37(4):461-71.

PMID:
8328240
11.

Accuracy of mammographic appearances after breast fine-needle aspiration.

Hindle WH, Chen EC.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jun;176(6):1286-90; discussion 1290-2.

PMID:
9215186
12.

Palpable breast masses with probably benign morphology at sonography: can biopsy be deferred?

Park YM, Kim EK, Lee JH, Ryu JH, Han SS, Choi SJ, Lee SJ, Yoon HK.

Acta Radiol. 2008 Dec;49(10):1104-11. doi: 10.1080/02841850802438504.

PMID:
18855166
13.

Clinical management of nonpalpable or small breast masses by fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) under ultrasound guidance.

Okamoto H, Ogawara T, Inoue S, Kobayashi K, Sekikawa T, Matsumoto Y.

J Surg Oncol. 1998 Apr;67(4):246-50.

PMID:
9579372
14.

Use of fine needle aspiration for solid breast lesions is accurate and cost-effective.

Rubin M, Horiuchi K, Joy N, Haun W, Read R, Ratzer E, Fenoglio M.

Am J Surg. 1997 Dec;174(6):694-6; discussion 697-8.

PMID:
9409599
15.

[Ultrasound follow-up of palpable solid, probably benign breast lesions (BI-RADS category III)].

Graf O, Helbich TH, Fuchsjäger MH, Hopf G, Morgun M, Graf C, Mallek R.

Rofo. 2004 Sep;176(9):1251-6. German.

PMID:
15346259
16.

Clinically palpable breast abnormalities with normal imaging: is clinically guided biopsy still required?

Gumus H, Gumus M, Mills P, Fish D, Devalia H, Jones SE, Jones PA, Sever AR.

Clin Radiol. 2012 May;67(5):437-40. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.10.010. Epub 2011 Nov 25.

PMID:
22119297
17.

Solid breast lesions: diagnosis with US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy.

Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL, Chan NH.

Radiology. 1993 Nov;189(2):573-80.

PMID:
8210392
18.

False-negative rate of combined mammography and ultrasound for women with palpable breast masses.

Chan CH, Coopey SB, Freer PE, Hughes KS.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Oct;153(3):699-702. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3557-2. Epub 2015 Sep 4.

PMID:
26341750
19.

Evaluation of palpable breast masses.

Klein S.

Am Fam Physician. 2005 May 1;71(9):1731-8. Review. Erratum in: Am Fam Physician. 2005 Sep 1;72(5):761.

20.

Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force [Internet].

Melnikow J, Fenton JJ, Whitlock EP, Miglioretti DL, Weyrich MS, Thompson JH, Shah K.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jan.

Supplemental Content

Support Center