Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 94

1.

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG.

BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60. Review. No abstract available.

2.

Diagnostic statistical procedures in medical meta-analyses.

Olkin I.

Stat Med. 1999 Sep 15-30;18(17-18):2331-41.

PMID:
10474143
3.

Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.

Ioannidis JP.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):951-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00986.x. Review.

PMID:
19018930
4.

An empirical comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in 12‚ÄČ894 meta-analyses.

Langan D, Higgins JP, Simmonds M.

Res Synth Methods. 2015 Jun;6(2):195-205. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1140. Epub 2015 Jun 6.

PMID:
26053175
5.

[Meta-analyses based on individual patient data (IPD)].

Bekkering GE, Cools F, Aertgeerts B, de Backer TL, Kellen E, van der Stichele RH, Buntinx F.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2009 Feb 28;153(9):402-6. Review. Dutch. No abstract available.

PMID:
19348098
6.

Reporting of measures of accuracy in systematic reviews of diagnostic literature.

Honest H, Khan KS.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2002;2:4. Epub 2002 Mar 7.

7.

Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy.

Irwig L, Macaskill P, Glasziou P, Fahey M.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Jan;48(1):119-30; discussion 131-2. Review.

PMID:
7853038
8.

Empirical evaluation of meta-analytic approaches for nutrient and health outcome dose-response data.

Yu WW, Schmid CH, Lichtenstein AH, Lau J, Trikalinos TA.

Res Synth Methods. 2013 Sep;4(3):256-68.

9.

What's with epidemiologic meta-analyses?

Partanen T.

Scand J Work Environ Health. 1996 Aug;22(4):241-2. No abstract available.

10.
11.

Statistics for quantifying heterogeneity in univariate and bivariate meta-analyses of binary data: the case of meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy.

Zhou Y, Dendukuri N.

Stat Med. 2014 Jul 20;33(16):2701-17. doi: 10.1002/sim.6115. Epub 2014 Feb 19.

PMID:
24903142
12.

Meta-analysis of screening data: a survey of the literature.

Walter SD, Jadad AR.

Stat Med. 1999 Dec 30;18(24):3409-24. Review.

PMID:
10611615
13.

Meta-analysis: statistical alchemy for the 21st century.

Feinstein AR.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Jan;48(1):71-9. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
7853050
14.

The case for failed meta-analyses.

Naylor CD.

J Eval Clin Pract. 1995 Nov;1(2):127-30. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
9238567
15.

Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.

Keus F, Wetterslev J, Gluud C, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;104(3):546-51. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2008.22.

PMID:
19262513
16.

Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach.

Chu H, Cole SR.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Dec;59(12):1331-2; author reply 1332-3. Epub 2006 Sep 28. No abstract available.

PMID:
17098577
17.

A consumer's guide to meta-analysis.

LaValley M.

Arthritis Care Res. 1997 Jun;10(3):208-13. Review.

PMID:
9335633
18.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses "For Dummies".

Biondi-Zoccai GG, Abbate A, Sheiban I.

EuroIntervention. 2009 Aug;5(3):289-91. No abstract available.

PMID:
19736151
19.

Multivariate random-effects approach: for meta-analysis of cancer staging studies.

Bipat S, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J.

Acad Radiol. 2007 Aug;14(8):974-84.

PMID:
17659244
20.

[Meta-analysis as a tool for gaining knowledge].

Koch A, Ziegler S.

Med Klin (Munich). 2000 May;95(1 Spec No):83-90. Review. German.

PMID:
10851854

Supplemental Content

Support Center