Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 197

1.

Estimation of radiation exposure in 16-detector row computed tomography of the heart with retrospective ECG-gating.

Trabold T, Buchgeister M, Küttner A, Heuschmid M, Kopp AF, Schröder S, Claussen CD.

Rofo. 2003 Aug;175(8):1051-5.

PMID:
12886472
2.
3.

Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT.

Hunold P, Vogt FM, Schmermund A, Debatin JF, Kerkhoff G, Budde T, Erbel R, Ewen K, Barkhausen J.

Radiology. 2003 Jan;226(1):145-52.

PMID:
12511683
4.

Saving dose in triple-rule-out computed tomography examination using a high-pitch dual spiral technique.

Sommer WH, Schenzle JC, Becker CR, Nikolaou K, Graser A, Michalski G, Neumaier K, Reiser MF, Johnson TR.

Invest Radiol. 2010 Feb;45(2):64-71. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181c15842.

PMID:
20027121
5.

Dose reduction in spiral CT coronary angiography with dual-source equipment. Part I. A phantom study applying different prospective tube current modulation algorithms.

Martini C, Palumbo A, Maffei E, Rossi A, Rengo M, Malagò R, Dijkshoorn M, Weustink A, Mollet N, Krestin G, Cademartiri F.

Radiol Med. 2009 Oct;114(7):1037-52. doi: 10.1007/s11547-009-0437-z. Epub 2009 Aug 7.

PMID:
19662339
6.

Estimation of radiation exposure of retrospective gated and prospective triggered 128-slice triple-rule-out CT angiography.

Ketelsen D, Fenchel M, Thomas C, Buchgeister M, Boehringer N, Tsiflikas I, Kaempf M, Claussen CD, Heuschmid M.

Acta Radiol. 2011 Sep 1;52(7):762-6. doi: 10.1258/ar.2010.100274. Epub 2011 Mar 9.

PMID:
21498316
7.

Estimation of radiation exposure in low-dose multislice computed tomography of the heart and comparison with a calculation program.

Hohl C, Mühlenbruch G, Wildberger JE, Leidecker C, Süss C, Schmidt T, Günther RW, Mahnken AH.

Eur Radiol. 2006 Aug;16(8):1841-6. Epub 2006 Feb 3.

PMID:
16456650
8.

Dual-source computed tomography: estimation of radiation exposure of ECG-gated and ECG-triggered coronary angiography.

Ketelsen D, Thomas C, Werner M, Luetkhoff MH, Buchgeister M, Tsiflikas I, Reimann A, Burgstahler C, Brodoefel H, Kopp AF, Claussen CD, Heuschmid M.

Eur J Radiol. 2010 Feb;73(2):274-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.10.033. Epub 2008 Dec 18.

PMID:
19097836
9.

Estimation of the radiation exposure of a chest pain protocol with ECG-gating in dual-source computed tomography.

Ketelsen D, Luetkhoff MH, Thomas C, Werner M, Buchgeister M, Tsiflikas I, Reimann A, Burgstahler C, Kopp AF, Claussen CD, Heuschmid M.

Eur Radiol. 2009 Jan;19(1):37-41. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1109-4. Epub 2008 Jul 22.

PMID:
18648818
10.

Radiation exposure to patients in a multicenter coronary angiography trial (CORE 64).

Geleijns J, Joemai RM, Dewey M, de Roos A, Zankl M, Cantera AC, Artells MS.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 May;196(5):1126-32. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3983.

PMID:
21512080
11.
12.

[Assessment of the effective dose for routine protocols in conventional CT, electron beam CT and coronary angiography].

Becker C, Schätzl M, Feist H, Bäuml A, Schöpf UJ, Michalski G, Lechel U, Hengge M, Brüning R, Reiser M.

Rofo. 1999 Jan;170(1):99-104. German.

PMID:
10071653
13.

Radiation dose reduction and coronary assessability of prospective electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated helical scan.

Maruyama T, Takada M, Hasuike T, Yoshikawa A, Namimatsu E, Yoshizumi T.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Oct 28;52(18):1450-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.048.

14.

Dose reduction in spiral CT coronary angiography with dual source equipment. Part II. Dose surplus due to slope-up and slope-down of prospective tube current modulation in a phantom model.

Martini C, Palumbo A, Maffei E, Rossi A, Rengo M, Malagò R, Dijkshoorn M, Weustink A, Mollet N, Krestin G, Cademartiri F.

Radiol Med. 2010 Feb;115(1):36-50. doi: 10.1007/s11547-010-0483-6. English, Italian.

PMID:
20058093
15.

Radiation dose exposure of computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison of dual-source, 16-slice and 64-slice CT.

Rixe J, Conradi G, Rolf A, Schmermund A, Magedanz A, Erkapic D, Deetjen A, Hamm CW, Dill T.

Heart. 2009 Aug;95(16):1337-42. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2008.161018. Epub 2009 May 28.

PMID:
19482842
16.

Estimation of radiation exposure of different dose saving techniques in 128-slice computed tomography coronary angiography.

Ketelsen D, Fenchel M, Buchgeister M, Thomas C, Boehringer N, Tsiflikas I, Kaempf M, Syha R, Claussen CD, Heuschmid M.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Feb;81(2):e153-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.052. Epub 2011 Feb 17.

PMID:
21333478
17.

A Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of patient dose in rest and stress cardiac computed tomography with a 320-detector row CT scanner.

Geleijns J, Joemai RM, Cros M, Hernandez-Giron I, Calzado A, Dewey M, Salvado M.

Phys Med. 2015 Dec;31(8):1029-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.08.008. Epub 2015 Oct 4.

PMID:
26439859
18.

Ultra-low-dose coronary artery calcium screening using multislice CT with retrospective ECG gating.

Jakobs TF, Wintersperger BJ, Herzog P, Flohr T, Suess C, Knez A, Reiser MF, Becker CR.

Eur Radiol. 2003 Aug;13(8):1923-30. Epub 2003 May 21.

PMID:
12759771
19.

Submillisievert median radiation dose for coronary angiography with a second-generation 320-detector row CT scanner in 107 consecutive patients.

Chen MY, Shanbhag SM, Arai AE.

Radiology. 2013 Apr;267(1):76-85. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122621. Epub 2013 Jan 22.

20.

Radiation dose at coronary CT angiography: second-generation dual-source CT versus single-source 64-MDCT and first-generation dual-source CT.

Fink C, Krissak R, Henzler T, Lechel U, Brix G, Takx RA, Nance JW, Abro JA, Schoenberg SO, Schoepf UJ.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 May;196(5):W550-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5153.

PMID:
21512044

Supplemental Content

Support Center