Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 172

1.

Liquid-based cytology: an Australian experience.

Farnsworth A.

Cytopathology. 2003 Apr;14(2):48-52. No abstract available.

PMID:
12713474
2.

Re: Liquid-based cytology for cervical screening.

Blamey S, Jackson T, Robinson J.

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Feb;46(1):70-1; author reply 71-2. No abstract available.

PMID:
16441706
3.

Quality control in cervical cancer screening: Brazilian experience.

Colla├žo LM, de Noronha L, Bleggi-Torres LF, Pinheiro DL.

Acta Cytol. 2005 Nov-Dec;49(6):694-6. No abstract available.

PMID:
16450916
4.

Current cervical screening technology considerations: liquid-based cytology and automated screening.

Russell J, Crothers BA, Kaplan KJ, Zahn CM.

Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;48(1):108-19. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
15725863
5.

Is it reality or an illusion that liquid-based cytology is better than conventional cervical smears?

Clelland CA.

Cytopathology. 2002 Apr;13(2):134-5. No abstract available.

PMID:
11952755
6.

Is it reality or an illusion that liquid-based cytology is better than conventional cervical smears?

Imrie JE, Gardiner DS, Wilson A.

Cytopathology. 2002 Apr;13(2):133-4. No abstract available.

PMID:
11952754
7.

Is it reality or an illusion that liquid-based cytology is better than conventional cervical smears?

Moseley R.

Cytopathology. 2002 Apr;13(2):135-6. No abstract available.

PMID:
11952756
8.

Liquid-based cytology - an alternative international view.

Broadstock M.

Cytopathology. 2001 Jun;12(3):141-3. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
11380554
9.

Cytologic detection of cervical abnormalities using liquid-based compared with conventional cytology: a randomized controlled trial.

Siebers AG, Klinkhamer PJ, Arbyn M, Raifu AO, Massuger LF, Bulten J.

Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;112(6):1327-34. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818c2b20.

PMID:
19037043
10.

Is it reality or an illusion that liquid-based cytology is better than conventional cervical smears? Authors' reply.

Herbert A, Johnson J.

Cytopathology. 2002 Apr;13(2):133. No abstract available.

PMID:
11952753
11.

Is it reality or an illusion that liquid-based cytology is better than conventional cervical smears?

Kitchener HC.

Cytopathology. 2002 Feb;13(1):64-5. No abstract available.

PMID:
11985571
12.

Liquid-based cytology: under scrutiny down-under.

Leiman G.

Diagn Cytopathol. 2007 Jul;35(7):379-80. No abstract available.

PMID:
17580350
13.

Evidence-based medicine versus liquid-based cytology.

Sawaya GF.

Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;111(1):2-3. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000298948.65284.d5. No abstract available.

PMID:
18165385
14.

Is it reality or an illusion that liquid-based cytology is better than conventional cervical smears?

Linder J.

Cytopathology. 2002 Feb;13(1):66. No abstract available.

PMID:
11985572
15.

Dutch solutions for liquid-based cytology: analysis of unsatisfactory slides and HPV testing of equivocal cytology.

Boon ME, Rijkaart DC, Ouwerkerk-Noordam E, Korporaal H.

Diagn Cytopathol. 2006 Sep;34(9):644-8.

PMID:
16900471
16.

Rapid, high throughput determination of cervical cytology specimen adequacy using a capillary-based cytometer.

Polina R, Sturgis C, Patterson J, Patterson BK.

Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2008 Mar;74(2):133-6.

17.

Re: using a quality control approach to define an 'adequately cellular' liquid-based cervical cytology specimen.

Evered A.

Cytopathology. 2007 Oct;18(5):325-6; author reply 326. No abstract available.

PMID:
17883693
18.

Evidence-based medicine--in real time. Comparing methods of cervical Ca screening.

Genova NJ.

JAAPA. 2000 Jan;13(1):55-6, 59-60, 63. No abstract available.

PMID:
11503224
20.

Liquid-based cytology for cervical screening.

Payne N, Chilcott J, McGoogan E.

Cytopathology. 2000 Dec;11(6):469-70. No abstract available.

PMID:
11194077

Supplemental Content

Support Center