Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 78

1.

Cochlear implants: some likely next steps.

Wilson BS, Lawson DT, Muller JM, Tyler RS, Kiefer J.

Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2003;5:207-49. Epub 2003 Apr 16. Review.

PMID:
12704085
2.
3.

Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.

Rader T, Fastl H, Baumann U.

Ear Hear. 2013 May-Jun;34(3):324-32. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318272f189.

PMID:
23263408
4.

Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility.

Qazi OU, van Dijk B, Moonen M, Wouters J.

Hear Res. 2013 May;299:79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

PMID:
23396271
5.

Neuroprosthetic hearing with auditory brainstem implants.

Kuchta J.

Biomed Tech (Berl). 2004 Apr;49(4):83-7.

PMID:
15171587
6.

Cochlear implants: current designs and future possibilities.

Wilson BS, Dorman MF.

J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(5):695-730. Review.

7.

[Direct acoustic cochlear stimulation for therapy of severe to profound mixed hearing loss: Codacs™ Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant System].

Lenarz T, Schwab B, Maier H, Kludt E.

HNO. 2014 Jul;62(7):481-9. doi: 10.1007/s00106-014-2893-6. German.

PMID:
25056645
8.

Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.

Laszig R, Aschendorff A, Stecker M, Müller-Deile J, Maune S, Dillier N, Weber B, Hey M, Begall K, Lenarz T, Battmer RD, Böhm M, Steffens T, Strutz J, Linder T, Probst R, Allum J, Westhofen M, Doering W.

Otol Neurotol. 2004 Nov;25(6):958-68.

PMID:
15547426
9.

Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.

Zeng FG, Liu S.

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Apr;49(2):367-80.

PMID:
16671850
10.

Two new directions in speech processor design for cochlear implants.

Wilson BS, Schatzer R, Lopez-Poveda EA, Sun X, Lawson DT, Wolford RD.

Ear Hear. 2005 Aug;26(4 Suppl):73S-81S. Review.

PMID:
16082269
11.

From electric acoustic stimulation to improved sound coding in cochlear implants.

Nopp P, Polak M.

Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;67:88-95. doi: 10.1159/000262600. Epub 2009 Nov 25. Review.

PMID:
19955725
12.

Amplitude-mapping effects on speech intelligibility with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants.

van Hoesel R, Böhm M, Battmer RD, Beckschebe J, Lenarz T.

Ear Hear. 2005 Aug;26(4):381-8.

PMID:
16079633
13.

Bilateral electric acoustic stimulation: a comparison of partial and deep cochlear electrode insertion. A longitudinal case study.

Punte AK, Vermeire K, Van de Heyning P.

Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;67:144-52. doi: 10.1159/000262606. Epub 2009 Nov 25.

PMID:
19955731
14.

The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.

Fitzpatrick EM, Séguin C, Schramm DR, Armstrong S, Chénier J.

Ear Hear. 2009 Oct;30(5):590-9. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181acfb70.

PMID:
19561509
15.
16.

Speech processing in vocoder-centric cochlear implants.

Loizou PC.

Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;64:109-43. Review.

PMID:
16891839
17.

Getting a decent (but sparse) signal to the brain for users of cochlear implants.

Wilson BS.

Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:24-38. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.11.009. Epub 2014 Dec 9. Review.

18.
19.

Contrasting benefits from contralateral implants and hearing aids in cochlear implant users.

van Hoesel RJ.

Hear Res. 2012 Jun;288(1-2):100-13. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.11.014. Epub 2011 Dec 30. Review.

PMID:
22226928
20.

Acceptance and fitting of the DUET device - a combined speech processor for electric acoustic stimulation.

Helbig S, Baumann U.

Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;67:81-7. doi: 10.1159/000262599. Epub 2009 Nov 25.

PMID:
19955724

Supplemental Content

Support Center