Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 277

1.
2.

Responses to selection on male-phase duration in Chamerion angustifolium.

Routley MB, Husband BC.

J Evol Biol. 2005 Jul;18(4):1050-9.

3.

The mating consequences of sexual segregation within inflorescences of flowering plants.

Harder LD, Barrett SC, Cole WW.

Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Feb 22;267(1441):315-20.

4.

Mechanisms and evolution of deceptive pollination in orchids.

Jersáková J, Johnson SD, Kindlmann P.

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2006 May;81(2):219-35. Review.

PMID:
16677433
6.

A test of the effect of floral color change on pollination effectiveness using artificial inflorescences visited by bumblebees.

Kudo G, Ishii HS, Hirabayashi Y, Ida TY.

Oecologia. 2007 Nov;154(1):119-28. Epub 2007 Aug 3.

PMID:
17674052
7.

Seasonal changes in pollen-packaging schedules in the protandrous plant Chamerion angustifolium.

Sargent RD.

Oecologia. 2003 Apr;135(2):221-6. Epub 2003 Feb 27.

PMID:
12698343
8.

Effects of floral display size on male and female reproductive success in Mimulus ringens.

Karron JD, Mitchell RJ.

Ann Bot. 2012 Feb;109(3):563-70. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr193. Epub 2011 Aug 31.

9.

Impact of insect pollinator group and floral display size on outcrossing rate.

Brunet J, Sweet HR.

Evolution. 2006 Feb;60(2):234-46.

PMID:
16610316
10.
11.

Influence of inflorescence size on sexual expression and female reproductive success in a monoecious species.

Torices R, Méndez M.

Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2011 Jan;13 Suppl 1:78-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00292.x.

PMID:
21134090
12.

Selection through male function favors smaller floral display size in the common morning glory Ipomoea purpurea (Convolvulaceae).

Lau JA, Miller RE, Rausher MD.

Am Nat. 2008 Jul;172(1):63-74. doi: 10.1086/588080.

PMID:
18507519
13.
14.
15.

Variation in floral sex allocation and reproductive success in sequentially flowering inflorescence of Corydalis remota var. lineariloba (Fumariaceae).

Zeng YF, Bai WN, Zhou Y, Zhang DY.

J Integr Plant Biol. 2009 Mar;51(3):299-307. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2008.00724.x.

PMID:
19261073
16.

The influence of floral display size on selfing rates in Mimulus ringens.

Karron JD, Mitchell RJ, Holmquist KG, Bell JM, Funk B.

Heredity (Edinb). 2004 Mar;92(3):242-8.

17.

Density-dependent self-fertilization and male versus hermaphrodite siring success in an androdioecious plant.

Eppley SM, Pannell JR.

Evolution. 2007 Oct;61(10):2349-59. Epub 2007 Aug 17.

PMID:
17711472
18.

The reproductive assurance benefit of selfing: importance of flower size and population size.

Kennedy BF, Elle E.

Oecologia. 2008 Mar;155(3):469-77. Epub 2007 Dec 8.

PMID:
18066603
19.

Pollinator-mediated assortative mating in mixed ploidy populations of Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae).

Kennedy BF, Sabara HA, Haydon D, Husband BC.

Oecologia. 2006 Dec;150(3):398-408. Epub 2006 Sep 22.

PMID:
17024387
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center