Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 228

1.

Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation.

Beam CA, Conant EF, Sickles EA.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Feb 19;95(4):282-90.

PMID:
12591984
2.

Radiologist interpretive volume and breast cancer screening accuracy in a Canadian organized screening program.

Théberge I, Chang SL, Vandal N, Daigle JM, Guertin MH, Pelletier E, Brisson J.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Mar;106(3):djt461. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt461. Epub 2014 Mar 5.

PMID:
24598715
3.

Variability of interpretive accuracy among diagnostic mammography facilities.

Jackson SL, Taplin SH, Sickles EA, Abraham L, Barlow WE, Carney PA, Geller B, Berns EA, Cutter GR, Elmore JG.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jun 3;101(11):814-27. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp105. Epub 2009 May 26.

4.

Effect of radiologists' diagnostic work-up volume on interpretive performance.

Buist DS, Anderson ML, Smith RA, Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Monsees BS, Sickles EA, Taplin SH, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Onega TL.

Radiology. 2014 Nov;273(2):351-64. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132806. Epub 2014 Jun 24.

5.

Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists.

Barlow WE, Chi C, Carney PA, Taplin SH, D'Orsi C, Cutter G, Hendrick RE, Elmore JG.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Dec 15;96(24):1840-50.

6.

Improving the accuracy of mammography: volume and outcome relationships.

Esserman L, Cowley H, Eberle C, Kirkpatrick A, Chang S, Berbaum K, Gale A.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Mar 6;94(5):369-75.

PMID:
11880475
7.

Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy.

Elmore JG, Jackson SL, Abraham L, Miglioretti DL, Carney PA, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K, Onega T, Rosenberg RD, Sickles EA, Buist DS.

Radiology. 2009 Dec;253(3):641-51. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2533082308. Epub 2009 Oct 28.

8.

Re: Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation.

Kopans DB.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 May 21;95(10):758-9. No abstract available.

PMID:
12759394
9.

Association between radiologists' experience and accuracy in interpreting screening mammograms.

Molins E, Macià F, Ferrer F, Maristany MT, Castells X.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Apr 25;8:91. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-91.

10.

Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.

Smith-Bindman R, Chu P, Miglioretti DL, Quale C, Rosenberg RD, Cutter G, Geller B, Bacchetti P, Sickles EA, Kerlikowske K.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Mar 2;97(5):358-67.

PMID:
15741572
12.

Mammography facility characteristics associated with interpretive accuracy of screening mammography.

Taplin S, Abraham L, Barlow WE, Fenton JJ, Berns EA, Carney PA, Cutter GR, Sickles EA, Carl D, Elmore JG.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Jun 18;100(12):876-87. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn172. Epub 2008 Jun 10.

13.

Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.

Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Aug 1;99(15):1162-70. Epub 2007 Jul 24.

PMID:
17652282
14.

Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms.

Elmore JG, Wells CK, Lee CH, Howard DH, Feinstein AR.

N Engl J Med. 1994 Dec 1;331(22):1493-9.

15.
16.

Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample.

Beam CA, Layde PM, Sullivan DC.

Arch Intern Med. 1996 Jan 22;156(2):209-13.

PMID:
8546556
17.

Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States.

Buist DS, Anderson ML, Haneuse SJ, Sickles EA, Smith RA, Carney PA, Taplin SH, Rosenberg RD, Geller BM, Onega TL, Monsees BS, Bassett LW, Yankaskas BC, Elmore JG, Kerlikowske K, Miglioretti DL.

Radiology. 2011 Apr;259(1):72-84. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10101698. Epub 2011 Feb 22.

18.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.

Lehman CD, Wellman RD, Buist DS, Kerlikowske K, Tosteson AN, Miglioretti DL; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Nov;175(11):1828-37. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5231.

19.

When radiologists perform best: the learning curve in screening mammogram interpretation.

Miglioretti DL, Gard CC, Carney PA, Onega TL, Buist DS, Sickles EA, Kerlikowske K, Rosenberg RD, Yankaskas BC, Geller BM, Elmore JG.

Radiology. 2009 Dec;253(3):632-40. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2533090070. Epub 2009 Sep 29.

20.

Standardized abnormal interpretation and cancer detection ratios to assess reading volume and reader performance in a breast screening program.

Kan L, Olivotto IA, Warren Burhenne LJ, Sickles EA, Coldman AJ.

Radiology. 2000 May;215(2):563-7.

PMID:
10796940

Supplemental Content

Support Center