Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 126

1.

Comparative analysis of conventional Papanicolaou tests and a fluid-based thin-layer method.

Limaye A, Connor AJ, Huang X, Luff R.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003 Feb;127(2):200-4.

PMID:
12562235
3.

ThinPrep Papanicolaou testing to reduce false-negative cervical cytology.

Linder J, Zahniser D.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998 Feb;122(2):139-44.

PMID:
9499356
4.

ThinPrep versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in the cytologic follow-up of women with equivocal cervical smears.

Negri G, Menia E, Egarter-Vigl E, Vittadello F, Mian C.

Cancer. 2003 Dec 25;99(6):342-5.

5.

Positive predictive value of liquid-based and conventional cervical Papanicolaou smears reported as malignant.

Uyar DS, Eltabbakh GH, Mount SL.

Gynecol Oncol. 2003 May;89(2):227-32.

PMID:
12713984
6.

A thin-layer, liquid-based pap test for mass screening in an area of China with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma. A cross-sectional, comparative study.

Pan Q, Belinson JL, Li L, Pretorius RG, Qiao YL, Zhang WH, Zhang X, Wu LY, Rong SD, Sun YT.

Acta Cytol. 2003 Jan-Feb;47(1):45-50.

PMID:
12585030
7.

New tests for cervical cancer screening.

Nuovo J, Melnikow J, Howell LP.

Am Fam Physician. 2001 Sep 1;64(5):780-6. Review.

8.
9.

Diagnostic efficacy and validity of the ThinPrep method in cervical cytology.

Tezuka F, Oikawa H, Shuki H, Higashiiwai H.

Acta Cytol. 1996 May-Jun;40(3):513-8.

PMID:
8669188
10.

Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and a fluid-based, thin-layer system for cervical cancer screening.

Lee KR, Ashfaq R, Birdsong GG, Corkill ME, McIntosh KM, Inhorn SL.

Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Aug;90(2):278-84.

PMID:
9241308
11.
12.
13.

Comparative analysis of a liquid-based Pap test and concurrent HPV DNA assay of residual samples. A study of 608 cases.

Hong IS, Marshalleck J, Williams RH, Gaiter TE, Mielzynska-Lohnas I, Kim K.

Acta Cytol. 2002 Sep-Oct;46(5):828-34.

PMID:
12365215
14.

ThinPrep Pap Test. Accuracy for glandular disease.

Ashfaq R, Gibbons D, Vela C, Saboorian MH, Iliya F.

Acta Cytol. 1999 Jan-Feb;43(1):81-5.

PMID:
9987455
16.

Liquid-based cytology and conventional cervical smears: a comparison study in an Asian screening population.

Cheung AN, Szeto EF, Leung BS, Khoo US, Ng AW.

Cancer. 2003 Dec 25;99(6):331-5.

17.

Comparison of the sensitivity of conventional cytology and the ThinPrep Imaging System for 1,083 biopsy confirmed high-grade squamous lesions.

Halford JA, Batty T, Boost T, Duhig J, Hall J, Lee C, Walker K.

Diagn Cytopathol. 2010 May;38(5):318-26. doi: 10.1002/dc.21199.

PMID:
19813268
18.

[Liquid phase cytology in the primary screening for cervical cancer: a multicenter study].

Monsonégo J, Autillo-Touati A, Bergeron C, Dachez R, Liaras J, Saurel J, Zerat L, Chatelain P, Mottot C.

Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2001 Nov;29(11):799-807. French.

PMID:
11770273
19.

Effectiveness of liquid-based cytology and papanicolaou tests in a low risk population.

Lerma E, Quintana MJ, Quilez M, Esteva E, Carreras A, Bonfill X, Prat J, Calaf J.

Acta Cytol. 2007 May-Jun;51(3):399-406.

PMID:
17536542
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center