Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 113

1.

Color image analysis of cervical neoplasia using RGB computer color specification.

Nunobiki O, Sato M, Taniguchi E, Tang W, Nakamura M, Utsunomiya H, Nakamura Y, Mori I, Kakudo K.

Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 2002 Oct;24(5):289-94.

PMID:
12408561
2.

Quantitative and qualitative analysis of stain color using RGB computer color specification.

Kai M, Nunobiki O, Taniguchi E, Sakamoto Y, Kakudo K.

Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 1999 Dec;21(6):477-80.

PMID:
10626016
3.

Studies on Papanicolaou staining. I. Visible-light spectra of stained cervical cells.

Galbraith W, Marshall PN, Lee ES, Bacus JW.

Anal Quant Cytol. 1979 Nov-Dec;1(3):160-8.

PMID:
94521
4.

Computer recognition of cell nuclei from the uterine cervix.

Bibbo M, Bartels PH, Bahr GF, Taylor J, Wied GL.

Acta Cytol. 1973 Jul-Aug;17(4):340-50. No abstract available.

PMID:
4579185
5.

Prognosis of moderate dysplasia. Predictive value of selected markers in routinely prepared cervical smears.

Rosenthal DL, Philippe A, Hall TL, Harami S, Missirlian N, Suffin SC.

Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 1987 May;9(2):165-8.

PMID:
3606775
6.

The minimally abnormal Papanicolaou smear.

Brotzman GL, Julian TM.

Am Fam Physician. 1996 Mar;53(4):1154-62. Review.

PMID:
8629563
7.

Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.

Higgins RV, Hall JB, McGee JA, Laurent S, Alvarez RD, Partridge EE.

Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Aug;84(2):174-8.

PMID:
8041525
8.

Cytologic findings in stratified mucin-producing intraepithelial lesion of the cervix: A report of 34 cases.

Backhouse A, Stewart CJ, Koay MH, Hunter A, Tran H, Farrell L, Ruba S.

Diagn Cytopathol. 2016 Jan;44(1):20-5. doi: 10.1002/dc.23381.

PMID:
26493276
10.

Application of the CellDetect® staining technique in diagnosis of human cervical cancer.

He S, Wang GL, Zhu YY, Wu MH, Ji ZG, Seng J, Ji Y, Zhou JM, Chen L.

Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Feb;132(2):383-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.016.

11.

Hyperchromatic crowded groups: pitfalls in pap smear diagnosis.

Demay RM.

Am J Clin Pathol. 2000 Nov;114 Suppl:S36-43. Review.

PMID:
11996167
12.

Characteristics of false-negative ThinPrep cervical smears in women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Leung KM, Lam KK, Tse PY, Yeoh GP, Chan KW.

Hong Kong Med J. 2008 Aug;14(4):292-5.

13.
14.

Endocervical glandular atypia and adenocarcinoma: a correlation of cytology and histology.

Nasu I, Meurer W, Fu YS.

Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1993 Jul;12(3):208-18.

PMID:
8344758
15.

HPV DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples compared with cytologic screening to detect cervical cancer.

Wright TC Jr, Denny L, Kuhn L, Pollack A, Lorincz A.

JAMA. 2000 Jan 5;283(1):81-6.

PMID:
10632284
16.

Nuclear grooves in normal and abnormal cervical smears.

Payandeh F, Koss LG.

Acta Cytol. 2003 May-Jun;47(3):421-5.

PMID:
12789925
17.

Masking effect of hormonal contraceptives on discriminating quantitative features of visually normal intermediate cells in positive and negative cervical smears.

Kwikkel HJ, Boon ME, van Rijswijk MM, Rietveld WJ, Stolk JG.

Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 1986 Sep;8(3):227-32.

PMID:
3778614
18.
20.

Can keratin 8 and 17 immunohistochemistry be of diagnostic value in cervical cytology? A feasibility study.

Martens J, Baars J, Smedts F, Holterheus M, Kok MJ, Vooijs P, Ramaekers F.

Cancer. 1999 Apr 25;87(2):87-92.

PMID:
10227599
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center