Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 144

1.

Publication bias in editorial decision making.

Olson CM, Rennie D, Cook D, Dickersin K, Flanagin A, Hogan JW, Zhu Q, Reiling J, Pace B.

JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2825-8.

PMID:
12038924
2.

Role of editorial and peer review processes in publication bias: analysis of drug trials submitted to eight medical journals.

van Lent M, Overbeke J, Out HJ.

PLoS One. 2014 Aug 12;9(8):e104846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104846. eCollection 2014.

3.

Association between time interval to publication and statistical significance.

Dickersin K, Olson CM, Rennie D, Cook D, Flanagin A, Zhu Q, Reiling J, Pace B.

JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2829-31.

PMID:
12038925
4.

Predictors of publication: characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals.

Lee KP, Boyd EA, Holroyd-Leduc JM, Bacchetti P, Bero LA.

Med J Aust. 2006 Jun 19;184(12):621-6.

PMID:
16803442
5.

Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature.

De Oliveira GS Jr, Chang R, Kendall MC, Fitzgerald PC, McCarthy RJ.

Anesth Analg. 2012 May;114(5):1042-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182468fc6. Epub 2012 Feb 17.

PMID:
22344237
8.

Publication bias in orthopaedic research: an analysis of scientific factors associated with publication in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume).

Okike K, Kocher MS, Mehlman CT, Heckman JD, Bhandari M.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Mar;90(3):595-601. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00279.

PMID:
18310710
9.

Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting.

Callaham ML, Wears RL, Weber EJ, Barton C, Young G.

JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):254-7. Erratum in: JAMA 1998 Oct 14;280(14):1232.

PMID:
9676673
10.

Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial.

Cobo E, Selva-O'Callagham A, Ribera JM, Cardellach F, Dominguez R, Vilardell M.

PLoS One. 2007 Mar 28;2(3):e332.

11.

Fate of manuscripts rejected from the Red Journal.

Holliday EB, Yang G, Jagsi R, Hoffman KE, Bennett KE, Grace C, Zietman AL.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jan 1;91(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.10.003.

PMID:
25835616
12.

Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators.

Justice AC, Cho MK, Winker MA, Berlin JA, Rennie D.

JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):240-2. Erratum in: JAMA 1998 Sep 16;280(11):968.

PMID:
9676668
13.

Is there gender bias in JAMA's peer review process?

Gilbert JR, Williams ES, Lundberg GD.

JAMA. 1994 Jul 13;272(2):139-42.

PMID:
8015126
14.

Commercially funded and United States-based research is more likely to be published; good-quality studies with negative outcomes are not.

Lynch JR, Cunningham MR, Warme WJ, Schaad DC, Wolf FM, Leopold SS.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 May;89(5):1010-8.

PMID:
17473138
15.
16.

Differences between information in registries and articles did not influence publication acceptance.

van Lent M, IntHout J, Out HJ.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Sep;68(9):1059-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.019. Epub 2014 Nov 29.

17.

The fate of manuscripts rejected by a general medical journal.

Ray J, Berkwits M, Davidoff F.

Am J Med. 2000 Aug 1;109(2):131-5.

PMID:
10967154
18.

Peer review is an effective screening process to evaluate medical manuscripts.

Abby M, Massey MD, Galandiuk S, Polk HC Jr.

JAMA. 1994 Jul 13;272(2):105-7.

PMID:
8015116
19.

The fate of manuscripts rejected by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume).

Okike K, Kocher MS, Nwachukwu BU, Mehlman CT, Heckman JD, Bhandari M.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 5;94(17):e130.

PMID:
22992859
20.

Peer review comments on drug trials submitted to medical journals differ depending on sponsorship, results and acceptance: a retrospective cohort study.

van Lent M, IntHout J, Out HJ.

BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 30;5(9):e007961. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007961. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center