Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 103

1.

The subjective quality (SQF) of Bausch and Lomb SoflensTM.

Rosenblum WM, Leach NE.

Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1975 Oct;52(10):658-62.

PMID:
1200109
2.

Changes in the contrast sensitivity function induced by contact lens wear.

Applegate RA, Massof RW.

Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1975 Dec;52(12):840-6.

PMID:
1211417
3.

Soft (hydrophilic) contact lenses in U.S. Army aviation: an investigative study of the Bausch and Lomb Soflens.

Crosley JK, Braun EG, Bailey RW.

Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1974 Jul;51(7):470-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
4847484
4.

Effect of target contrast and luminance on soft contact lens and spectacle visual performance.

Guillon M, Lydon DP, Solman RT.

Curr Eye Res. 1988 Jul;7(7):635-48.

PMID:
3416617
5.

Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.

Richdale K, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K.

Optom Vis Sci. 2006 May;83(5):266-73.

PMID:
16699438
6.

Spectacles and custom toric hydrogel contact lenses: a comparison of vision.

Hall DK, Ward JA, Edmondson W.

J Am Optom Assoc. 1994 Nov;65(11):783-7.

PMID:
7822676
7.

Synergeyes versus soft toric lenses: vision-related quality of life.

Lipson MJ, Musch DC.

Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Jul;84(7):593-7.

PMID:
17632307
8.

Visual correction of keratoconus with soft contact lenses.

Koliopoulos J, Tragakis M.

Ann Ophthalmol. 1981 Jul;13(7):835-7.

PMID:
7294620
9.

[Evaluation of optical performance of soft contact lenses in myopic correction].

Dalcoll MW, Alves MR, Barreto J Jr, Yamane Ide S, Bechara S, Mukai A.

Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2008 Nov-Dec;71(6 Suppl):37-41. Portuguese.

10.

Critical base curve and diameter interval in the fitting of spherical soft contact lenses.

Lowther GE, Tomlinson A.

Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1981 May;58(5):355-60.

PMID:
7258284
11.

On-eye evaluation of optical performance of rigid and soft contact lenses.

Hong X, Himebaugh N, Thibos LN.

Optom Vis Sci. 2001 Dec;78(12):872-80.

PMID:
11780664
12.

Subjective and objective assessment of soft bifocal contact lens performance.

Bullimore MA, Jacobs RJ.

Optom Vis Sci. 1993 Jun;70(6):469-75.

PMID:
8336908
13.
14.

An analysis of visual performance with soft contact lens and spectacle correction.

Tomlinson A, Mann G.

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1985;5(1):53-7.

PMID:
3975045
15.

Contrast sensitivities through spectacles and soft contact lenses.

Bernstein IH, Brodrick J.

Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1981 Apr;58(4):309-13.

PMID:
7282856
16.

Comparison of silicone and non-silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses used as a bandage after LASEK.

Gil-Cazorla R, Teus MA, Arranz-Márquez E.

J Refract Surg. 2008 Feb;24(2):199-203.

PMID:
18297946
17.

Visual performance with soft hydrophilic contact lenses.

Pointer JS, Gilmartin B, Larke JR.

Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1985 Oct;62(10):694-701.

PMID:
4073203
18.

[Visual performance in myopic correction with spectacles and soft contact lenses].

Barth B, Alves MR, Kara-José N.

Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2008 Jan-Feb;71(1):90-6. Portuguese.

19.

Fitting contact lenses after myopic keratomileusis.

Chou AC, Swinger CA, Cogger SK.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999 Apr;25(4):508-13.

PMID:
10198855
20.

A device to assess visual performance with optical aids.

Pointer JS, Gilmartin B, Larke JR.

Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1981 May;58(5):408-13. No abstract available.

PMID:
7258292

Supplemental Content

Support Center