Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 205

1.

Reduced adaptation of a non-recombining neo-Y chromosome.

Bachtrog D, Charlesworth B.

Nature. 2002 Mar 21;416(6878):323-6.

PMID:
11907578
2.
3.
4.

Evidence that positive selection drives Y-chromosome degeneration in Drosophila miranda.

Bachtrog D.

Nat Genet. 2004 May;36(5):518-22. Epub 2004 Apr 25.

PMID:
15107853
5.
6.

Molecular evolution of a Y chromosome to autosome gene duplication in Drosophila.

Dyer KA, White BE, Bray MJ, Piqué DG, Betancourt AJ.

Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Mar;28(3):1293-306. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq334. Epub 2010 Dec 16.

PMID:
21172827
7.
8.

Reduced levels of microsatellite variability on the neo-Y chromosome of Drosophila miranda.

Bachtrog D, Charlesworth B.

Curr Biol. 2000 Sep 7;10(17):1025-31.

10.
11.

Recombination enhances protein adaptation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Presgraves DC.

Curr Biol. 2005 Sep 20;15(18):1651-6.

12.
13.

Low variability in a Y-linked plant gene and its implications for Y-chromosome evolution.

Filatov DA, Monéger F, Negrutiu I, Charlesworth D.

Nature. 2000 Mar 23;404(6776):388-90.

PMID:
10746725
14.

Evolution of amino-acid sequences and codon usage on the Drosophila miranda neo-sex chromosomes.

Bartolomé C, Charlesworth B.

Genetics. 2006 Dec;174(4):2033-44. Epub 2006 Oct 8.

15.

Retroelements: tools for sex chromosome evolution.

Steinemann S, Steinemann M.

Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;110(1-4):134-43.

PMID:
16093665
16.

Biased distribution of repetitive elements: a landmark for neo-Y chromosome evolution in Drosophila miranda.

Steinemann S, Steinemann M.

Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2001;93(3-4):228-33.

PMID:
11528116
17.

Adaptive protein evolution of X-linked and autosomal genes in Drosophila: implications for faster-X hypotheses.

Connallon T.

Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Nov;24(11):2566-72. Epub 2007 Sep 19.

PMID:
17884828
18.
19.

Genomic degradation of a young Y chromosome in Drosophila miranda.

Bachtrog D, Hom E, Wong KM, Maside X, de Jong P.

Genome Biol. 2008;9(2):R30. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-2-r30. Epub 2008 Feb 12.

20.

Reduced effectiveness of selection caused by a lack of recombination.

Betancourt AJ, Welch JJ, Charlesworth B.

Curr Biol. 2009 Apr 28;19(8):655-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.039. Epub 2009 Mar 12.

Supplemental Content

Support Center